Glory of Faith:Akbar n MUZ-Pt3-JA Not Fiction|Akbar Seals-P25,Note-P26 - Page 3

why is akbar so old in this and jodha so young...bechara stress lete lete jaldi buddha ho gaya kya.

Thanks for sharing and kudos for your efforts👏

Originally posted by: peepu

Hello

Since the description says its MUZ...but if we look at the attire of the lady she is in mughal dress...means

She adopted mughal dressing?

Or the painter changed it for chronicles. ..please share if you know.thanks

👏
ur question is worth answering..
and i was REALLy thinking if someone asks this question then what will i say..😕..coz m not ready with references..😕.

i do not LIKE to write till i have references to back my words.
but, only for this question..i would love to answer this question..because the reason given is again...😳👏..

i know something from the accounts of a traveller who visited india around 1750-60. ..i "think", he was from dutch east indies company...
m not sure 100%..

but the following lines are a fact;;--infact i'll try to write as it is i read it..😊.--read on..->>
he describes a few portraits, from the royal house of the great moguls
" in the entire party of his majestys', only a single lady is a non-Muhammadan who adores a different attire in each of those artworks, from the rest of the royals. she is his chief mistress. she occupies a place next to his majesty.
"

c here u may say, that, it is not clear that the lady is MUZ...
but he says her to be non-Muhammadan.
probably from her style of dressing.
and 1 more thing, it is a fact well known, ATLEAST to me, that MUZ had also the freedom of her own dress..because there are more accounts which mention same thing...

i do not say she did not wore mughal clothing.
she cud have.
but i never read it.
and this present picture is something..a nightsuit sort of.
what i read is his chief wife, wore a clothing different from Muhammadan wives, and always sat by his side in court. .

also,
well on a shocking note, the first Portuguese travellers who visited akbar's court, described even him to be hindu...u know the reason.????

they said he dressed totally as hindus in the mughal court, no one cud identify him to be a non-hindu..
this is not story..
if i recollect correctly, this is given in the a Portuguese account by father jesuit.!!!(most probably)..

if still not believed, get ready to see in the serial for sure, they will show this.
coz, he many times used to dress a a TOTAL HINDU, defying the maulvis...😆..
and i know ppl will say its EKTA track..(as usual...😆)

on a different note, do u feel shahnama track was creation of CV's...????😉

coming back to topic...
u may feel where are these pics..??

d pics remained dere..(mentioned by the same traveller i quoted above..)
what hpnd 2 dem.??
ok i tell u..
these pics were transferred to red fort in delhi...they stayed there for around 100-150 years till 1858..
but again
in the war of 1857, large parts of red fort were destroyed...
many pics were burnt..by victorious forces...
and buried in ground...

all these are not stories, but facts.

i can quote more evidences, only thing i am not ready wid evidences...😕
so better to stay quiet..🤬
but hope 1 thng is clear apart from religious freedom she CLEARLY had freedom to wear her own dress or as per mughal customs.

hope its clear..😊

Originally posted by: sara5471

salute you for all your efforts.

Your posts are a storehouse of knowledge.

I saw the pic but I couldn't decipher it. Akbar looks old (fine) but MUZ is wearing, um, kind of, provocative dress which looks 100% Mughal. How come?

in every pic of MUZ till date,
she is never shown OLD..

regrarding ur second question..
i have answered...the question of peepu..on previous page
have a look...😊

By 1750, MUZ was dead. How calm this is possible? U might have confused her with someone else and the book might have too.

Originally posted by: aanchal_c

why is akbar so old in this and jodha so young...bechara stress lete lete jaldi buddha ho gaya kya.

ur answer is written above and in my comment to peepu on previous page..😊.
hve a look..

Originally posted by: rach2012

By 1750, MUZ was dead. How calm this is possible? U might have confused her with someone else and the book might have too.

😆
yes by 1750 muz was dead..
read my comment carefully...

he is describing the portrait..not MUZ alive...😆

Originally posted by: history_geek

👏
ur question is worth answering..
and i was REALLy thinking if someone asks this question then what will i say..😕..coz m not ready with references..😕.

i do not LIKE to write till i have references to back my words.
but, only for this question..i would love to answer this question..because the reason given is again...😳👏..

i know something from the accounts of a traveller who visited india around 1750-60. ..i "think", he was from dutch east indies company...
m not sure 100%..

but the following lines are a fact;;--infact i'll try to write as it is i read it..😊.--read on..->>
he describes a few portraits, from the royal house of the great moguls
" in the entire party of his majestys', only a single lady is a non-Muhammadan who adores a different attire in each of those artworks, from the rest of the royals. she is his chief mistress. she occupies a place next to his majesty.
"

c here u may say, that, it is not clear that the lady is MUZ...
but he says her to be non-Muhammadan.
probably from her style of dressing.
and 1 more thing, it is a fact well known, ATLEAST to me, that MUZ had also the freedom of her own dress..because there are more accounts which mention same thing...

i do not say she did not wore mughal clothing.
she cud have.
but i never read it.
and this present picture is something..a nightsuit sort of.
what i read is his chief wife, wore a clothing different from Muhammadan wives, and always sat by his side in court. .

also,
well on a shocking note, the first Portuguese travellers who visited akbar's court, described even him to be hindu...u know the reason.????

they said he dressed totally as hindus in the mughal court, no one cud identify him to be a non-hindu..
this is not story..
if i recollect correctly, this is given in the a Portuguese account by father jesuit.!!!(most probably)..

if still not believed, get ready to see in the serial for sure, they will show this.
coz, he many times used to dress a a TOTAL HINDU, defying the maulvis...😆..
and i know ppl will say its EKTA track..(as usual...😆)

on a different note, do u feel shahnama track was creation of CV's...????😉

coming back to topic...
u may feel where are these pics..??

d pics remained dere..(mentioned by the same traveller i quoted above..)
what hpnd 2 dem.??
ok i tell u..
these pics were transferred to red fort in delhi...they stayed there for around 100-150 years till 1858..
but again
in the war of 1857, large parts of red fort were destroyed...
many pics were burnt..by victorious forces...
and buried in ground...

all these are not stories, but facts.

i can quote more evidences, only thing i am not ready wid evidences...😕
so better to stay quiet..🤬
but hope 1 thng is clear apart from religious freedom she CLEARLY had freedom to wear her own dress or as per mughal customs.

hope its clear..😊

thanks for the clarification..yes I've also read MUZ wore hindu clothes but I hope they show it in soap too jo wearing mughal clothes for a change...

Originally posted by: ramyadwarampudi

@history-geek once again thanks for sharing u r knowledge with us...👏

The information provided by Abhay is always very interesting and very solid to believe the relation between akbar and jodha is strong and satisfying