Today too, in the scene between Hamida Banu and Sheikh Salim Chisti (it was with his blessings that Salim was born to Akbar and Jodha much later), her constant refrain that Jalal is cruel and grasping, going so far as to say that he defames Islam, was ridiculous. What does she think father in law Babur did in his time? And when Humayun was gentle with his adversaries, what happened to him and to her and to Jalal? Every ruler has to be harsh at times to maintain control, for the greater benefit of all his subjects. The Mughal empire, just recently recovered thanks to Bairam Khan and Jalal, is not a nursery school!😉
Shyamala B.Cowsik
Originally posted by: blahblahs
Sashashyam,
I couldn't agree more! I was also a little surprised with this director's portrayal of Jalal. He does indeed seem unrealistically cruel. As far as Jodha is concerned, she also seems to be some sort of a "guardian angel." For example, she approached her father--a King--to break off her marriage with Suryabhan for her the sake of her sister's infatuation. That struck me as being overly "mahan."Anyhow, I think the director's trying to point out how confused Jalal really was due to the strong, polarized influences of Maham Anga and Bairam Khan. He was sad, deprived of love; this very loneliness resulted in cruelty and made him the frenetic warrior he was ie. chopping of soldiers' heads.Let's now see how the director develops the character further!