Is it fair? - Page 20

Originally posted by: Deewangi

She should have been a choreographer if she's so great (have yet to watch her...)

Same goes for Lauren and others...

After all the concept of this show is Dancing With the Stars...not the trained proffesionals!

Originally posted by: Strange_girl

The show is Sub-Titled, 'Dancing With Stars' and not 'Dancing with Non-Dancers'😆😆

Just becoz other STARS are untrained or haven't won any reality show doesnt meant a trained one shouldnt perform.

Nor is deir any rule like Dancers shouldnt participate😳

Originally posted by: mysti

but darling she already is a STAR...for her popular channelV show D3...she has been called as a celebrity only if you dont know that😆
and she is a great dancer its just an added advantage😳

Originally posted by: lovely_lady

I'll just quote what I wrote in another topic:

By that logic, why even have famous choreographers? Even the choreographers are stars in their own dancing fields. I think Sneha, Karanvir's partner from last year is a Salsa champion. By that status, she was a star in her field. What business did she have being a choreographer?

At the end of the day, Shakti has an unfair advantage over the other contestants.

Also, I'd just like to make it clear that I'm not a Shakti hater. I actually really like her and her dancing, just not when she's competing with people she has a clear advantage over.

Originally posted by: lovely_lady

In my opinion, there's a difference between trained dancer's and professional dancers. As a trained dancer, you've been taught to do some dance forms. You're good at it. As a professional, you're beyond good. You're amazing at dancing, basically perfect.

Ritvik is a trained dancer. But Shakti is a professional. She makes her living off dancing. There's no question at all, she has a CLEAR advantage over the others as the WINNER of a PROFESSIONAL DANCING show.