Krushna's Act - Page 2

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Priya

@priya185

Master

+ 42

Posted: 14 years ago

#11

its judges decision if they want to they will

plus there was an article saying he (KA) was offered to stay in jdj but he refused and said he didnt want to come back, many agree this show is scripted so i geuss this another reason

ankita's was good i'd defo say she improved since last performance nd if it was scored she'd get more marks then then (27)

Salyaana and anki-nishant did diff forms so its not all that easy to compare diffferent forms and both did justice to their forms

salyaana did have more time then anki-nishant even thought he was injured he can still teach her steps in that time and try his best to dance like he did before

so yh all these factors condiered i do think they both deserved to stay

and krushna he is good i admit too but even if he got in competition how far could he go with his choreo who doesnt know hindi

Quote

nisha

@Nisha_90

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

#12

first of all krushna's performance was gudd but i liked Ankita's more just my POV..and in 90 secs u just shouldn't dance u should make the act wholesome which i think krushna's one lacked

judges are not scripted as far as i feel..dey are s'ly genuine..

and decision was apt cos yana's performance the bestttt and Ankita just close but also great <333

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

AreYaar

@AreYaar

Icon

+ 19

Posted: 14 years ago

#13

The format has already been tweaked enough that jokers like Shekhar Suman are still in this competition and talented performers like Yana, Krishna and Ankita are being put through the wildcard.....so in that sense, anything can happen in this show now.....I feel it is more important to raise the question as to what the hell Shekhar Suman is doing in this show and where is this hidden "mass fanbase" of his that is supposedly keeping him alive in this show.

Quote

Ekta

@-desigirl-

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: -Priyalicious-
its judges decision if they want to they will
plus there was an article saying he (KA) was offered to stay in jdj but he refused and said he didnt want to come back, many agree this show is scripted so i geuss this another reason

ankita's was good i'd defo say she improved since last performance nd if it was scored she'd get more marks then then (27)

Salyaana and anki-nishant did diff forms so its not all that easy to compare diffferent forms and both did justice to their forms

salyaana did have more time then anki-nishant even thought he was injured he can still teach her steps in that time and try his best to dance like he did before

so yh all these factors condiered i do think they both deserved to stay

and krushna he is good i admit too but even if he got in competition how far could he go with his choreo who doesnt know hindi

judges decision? i doubt 😆

krushna refused? i doubt 😆 ... if an article says krushna refused then why does another article appear sayin hes fustrated about the decision? we cannot accept only our side of wht media says .. you should consider both sides ... if the media contradicts then its not right to believe just one side for the sake of it

and who wouldnt want to come back 😕...

salyaana DIDNT have more time .... they had one week and so did ankitas and nishant ... didnt you realize they performed the same act they would have performed on monday if they werent eliminated?? ... i dont know why the hosts lied to tht

and if krushnas choreographer doesnt knw hindi so wht ... the fact tht she doesnt knw hindi didnt spoil or harm their act did it....

Edited by ekta_salman - 14 years ago

Quote

Nikita Lakhe

@nikitagmc

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#15

Ankita's performance was very interesting and I personally liked it- more so bcos concept always appeals more to me than dancing itself. There was grace as well as fire in the dance, and the overall dance/act seemed very impressive to me.

Originally posted by: blyton

The fact that Ankita was ranked BELOW Yana proves that Yana was the best choice for Wild Card....and since there was supposed to be only one WC, only Yana should have got in. There was no reason to tweak the format to bring in Ankita.

Yana was clearly the best today and she deserved to come back as she was no. 1 and format was that the best should be taken back. But I think the judges expressed it quite openly that the performances were very good (better than some who are safe right now, actually) and felt that more than one deserved to be back. And so they wanted two to be back.I somehow think that even then judges took Ankita back for 2^nd spot and not Krushna (even though Ankita Yana were not at same level, rather Krushna Ankita were at same level) cos she has given some excellent and daring performances earlier- the difficult Rajasthani dance, the Kathak, excellently done Break and so on. Remo and Madhuri always complimented Ankita more than Krushna earlier also, and Madhuri with her statements like- I see myself in Ankita' has somehow denoted that Ankita has really impressed her as a dancer (even though she may not have got a perfect 30 due to her choreo) So I somehow felt today that where Ankita was concerned- it was a consideration of her Wild card performance as well as her cumulative effect of her performances till date.

When there is a tie-breaker, then additional considerations are used to arrive at a conclusion. I feel that even though Ankita-Krushna were both at par, Ankita came higher by this criteria- evaluation on the basis of past performances, previous vote bank and so on, that who had better chances of coming up as a tough competitor.

Just my unbiased opinion! 😊

Edited by nikitagmc - 14 years ago

Quote

acre

@acre

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#16

first of all there is no doubt that krushna is one of the most talented dancer in JDJ,
btw from the last 4 years krushna has entertain all of us with its great comedy skills in comedy circus,
sometimes he also said in the funny manner that he got good marks in comedy circus becoz of his dancing skills rather his comic timings😆
u wont believe it but i m a huge admirer of krushna & sudesh becoz they both have entertain me through their unforgettable performances in comedy circus

but ankita's performance was also too good,😃
i m totally agreed with my friend prati's POV that we should respect the judges decision,
i have observed plenty of members on this forum r now bashing ankita for its attitude,
thats not right bashing of actors wont be allowed under the rules & regulation of IF,

ankita is a very nice human being,
i m so proud of her she always gave her 100% effort in her performances either in acting in PR or dancing in JDJ,
i m a big fan of ankita,
whenever i have watches her in PR it will refreshes my mind
i m so happy that she has come back again in JDJ through wildcard entry,

Edited by acre - 14 years ago

Quote

112642

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#17

okay, i thought that there was a judges sav, where IF THE JUDGES WANT, they can save a contestant from elimination. according to my understanding, this was to happen AFTER the wild card entry.

keeping that in mind, judges felt that ankita deserved to be saves as she got performance of the week (last week) and that today she was exceptionally good, and that she had potential to show more groW*H and blossom more as a dancer!

though yana's lifts and dance was good and probably harder, nobody should discount that tandav is also equally harder. the beats, the rhytm is hard to keep up with, so credit should be given there as well.

in this case, yana has experience dancing, but compartivly, ankita is a a newbie, and doing tandav with such a good grasp of it, might have moved the judges to save her and let her continue on the show.

coming to krushna and ankita, judges might have conidered body of work, past scores and consisteny in performing well, and bringing new, innovative performances. in that area, without bias, i think ankita wins hands down. she has tried to bring in something new to the table, be it jazz, contempary, tandav, hip-hop.

undoubedtly krushna is a good dancer, trying his best all the time, but in the above catagories, i think, ankita is better.

i dont want to offend anyone, but i think, if fans feel that their contestant did do better, maybe, that comparsion should be kept within th AT. this will minimize the friction bwtween forum members. again, no intention to offend anyone, just a personal opinon.😊

Edited by tiya229 - 14 years ago

Quote

Anjali

@blyton

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#18

Hmmm I don't think the issue here is pitting Ankita against Krushna, but questioning the channel (or the judges' decision) to tweak the format. They should at least have given a proper justification for it. It would have been different if JDJ had been a home-grown show; when you adapt from a popular international format, at least give some explanation for taking such drastic liberties with it.

Quote

Nikita Lakhe

@nikitagmc

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: ekta_salman
judges decision? i doubt 😆
krushna refused? i doubt 😆 ... if an article says krushna refused then why does another article appear sayin hes fustrated about the decision? we cannot accept only our side of wht media says .. you should consider both sides ... if the media contradicts then its not right to believe just one side for the sake of it

and who wouldnt want to come back 😕...

Krushna expressed it quite openly in MORE THAN ONE interviews that he didn't have the heart to come back after being insulted in front of his Mama (even if he didn't actually mean it) and even went to the extent of saying JDJ is rigged. Now when such statements are made, the judges automatically become dismissive- why chose someone who is already disinterested and somehow doubts the system becomes their thinking. They start thinking why shouldn't they chose someone who is equally good, has delivered good performances in the past , still pumped up about the show and enthusiastic about it and wants to do much better every week?

I'll give you an example. There was a reality show- SRGMP Ek main aur ek tu- the best pair Twinkle and Vishal were on the verge of elimination due to low votes, and the judges had the power to bring back one couple by a veto. They asked Twinkle Vishal how they felt about it. Twinkle Vishal said that they had lost faith in the voting system, people were voting for unfair reasons, emotional reasons, and that they were very upset with everything and even felt it was futile performing their best every week. At this the judges, Leslie Lewis and Hariharan said- "If you have already lost faith in the system and are no longer pumped up about giving your best, then I don't think there is any use bringing you back on the show"- Mind you- they were the BEST pair in SRGMP Ek Main aur ek tu that year.

Edited by nikitagmc - 14 years ago

Quote

shalurulez

@shalurulez

Navigator

Posted: 14 years ago

#20

u guys shld also realise tht ankita dint have ny tym to prepare for the wildcard.......it ws jus lyk the normal contenstants....a preiod of 1 week....wereas all otrs got weeks to perform!!!! so compared to tht,she did an awesum job.....

n ofcrz...yana is yana....she did a fantablous job n thts xactly y she got in 1st.... :D

but anki too desrved it coz i believe tht she wsnt out coz of public vote,am sure it ws coz it ws scripted only.....!!!!! coz derz noooo chnce sherkar n daya r getin mre than her!!

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 8

Krushna's Act - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics