Krushna's Act - Page 2

Ankita's performance was very interesting and I personally liked it- more so bcos concept always appeals more to me than dancing itself. There was grace as well as fire in the dance, and the overall dance/act seemed very impressive to me.

Yana was clearly the best today and she deserved to come back as she was no. 1 and format was that the best should be taken back. But I think the judges expressed it quite openly that the performances were very good (better than some who are safe right now, actually) and felt that more than one deserved to be back. And so they wanted two to be back.I somehow think that even then judges took Ankita back for 2^nd spot and not Krushna (even though Ankita Yana were not at same level, rather Krushna Ankita were at same level) cos she has given some excellent and daring performances earlier- the difficult Rajasthani dance, the Kathak, excellently done Break and so on. Remo and Madhuri always complimented Ankita more than Krushna earlier also, and Madhuri with her statements like- I see myself in Ankita' has somehow denoted that Ankita has really impressed her as a dancer (even though she may not have got a perfect 30 due to her choreo) So I somehow felt today that where Ankita was concerned- it was a consideration of her Wild card performance as well as her cumulative effect of her performances till date.

When there is a tie-breaker, then additional considerations are used to arrive at a conclusion. I feel that even though Ankita-Krushna were both at par, Ankita came higher by this criteria- evaluation on the basis of past performances, previous vote bank and so on, that who had better chances of coming up as a tough competitor.

Just my unbiased opinion! 😊

Krushna expressed it quite openly in MORE THAN ONE interviews that he didn't have the heart to come back after being insulted in front of his Mama (even if he didn't actually mean it) and even went to the extent of saying JDJ is rigged. Now when such statements are made, the judges automatically become dismissive- why chose someone who is already disinterested and somehow doubts the system becomes their thinking. They start thinking why shouldn't they chose someone who is equally good, has delivered good performances in the past , still pumped up about the show and enthusiastic about it and wants to do much better every week?

I'll give you an example. There was a reality show- SRGMP Ek main aur ek tu- the best pair Twinkle and Vishal were on the verge of elimination due to low votes, and the judges had the power to bring back one couple by a veto. They asked Twinkle Vishal how they felt about it. Twinkle Vishal said that they had lost faith in the voting system, people were voting for unfair reasons, emotional reasons, and that they were very upset with everything and even felt it was futile performing their best every week. At this the judges, Leslie Lewis and Hariharan said- "If you have already lost faith in the system and are no longer pumped up about giving your best, then I don't think there is any use bringing you back on the show"- Mind you- they were the BEST pair in SRGMP Ek Main aur ek tu that year.