hide thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#1
His performance was much better than Ankita .. Judges were not fair at all.. very bad judgement on a talented individual.

Created

Last reply

Replies

71

Views

5.8k

Users

28

Likes

144

Frequent Posters

blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#2
I felt he and Ankita were at par....and I really don't see any reason why there should have been TWO wild cards. Had the top two been equally good it would have been a different matter. However, Yana was way better than Ankita so only she should have been brought back.

This is just my opinion....I have nothing against Ankita or her fans!
blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#3
P.S. I noticed that the judges didn't look too enthusiastic when Krushna got a standing ovation. Wonder why??
-desigirl- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#4

i agree:)

first of all .. whts up with comparing ankita and yaanas act ... god ... yaanas act was ten times better and harder in my opinion ... who can do such lifts? those lifts were no joke i was astonished .. i kept rewinding to see how the hell were the lifts done O_O
it wasnt an act to be compared with the others
and now comin back to the topic lol ... krushna deserved to come back! .. the energy and non stop dance they did in 90 seconds .. like wow .. considerin krushna isnt a dancer yet the energy he danced with it ... i loved it and you could see they had worked really hard for it .. if there was only one wc entry then i wouldnt have said anythin of curs but seein tht they got two wcs i feel bad for krushna ,.. he deserved to come back and stay several weeks more :/
EDIT ..ok my rant goes on ... they chose 2 wcs right? tht means ankita and yaana were on the same level? wht a joke 😆😆
i dont find it right tht they did this .. theyre makin it seem tht both were the best
either they should have taken only YAANA or either they should have taken YAANA KRUSHNA AND ANKITA
but wht they did is stupid
Edited by ekta_salman - 14 years ago
-desigirl- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: blyton

P.S. I noticed that the judges didn't look too enthusiastic when Krushna got a standing ovation. Wonder why??

here we go with another proof tht its scripted 😆
CuteCherry thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#6
well mayber they thought Ankita and yana both did well so they both got in and by looking at the performance Ankita was really good so she got in and btw where did u see comparison between yana and ankita???.there was no comparison between yana and ankita. i think yana was ranked 1st and Ankita 2nd so i dont know what u r talking about??? and what's the joke if they compare yana and Ankita. i think they both are popular celebrities and both are fabulous dancers 😊


blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: CuteCherry

well mayber they thought Ankita and yana both did well so they both got in and by looking at the performance Ankita was really good so she got in and btw where did u see comparison between yana and ankita???.there was no comparison between yana and ankita. i think yana was ranked 1st and Ankita 2nd so i dont know what u r talking about??? and what's the joke if they compare yana and Ankita. i think they both are popular celebrities and both are fabulous dancers 😊




The fact that Ankita was ranked BELOW Yana proves that Yana was the best choice for Wild Card....and since there was supposed to be only one WC, only Yana should have got in. There was no reason to tweak the format to bring in Ankita.
coolpratz thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#8
uff!! not again......
we r not the expert to see small nooks of the performance....... judges took ankita back coz they felt she was good..... n indeed she was... her performance was awesome...👍🏼
i thought she was better than krushna...👏
blyton thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#9
Please understand the point we are trying to make!!

Nobody is disputing that Ankita's performance was GOOD. We are questioning the rationale behind having TWO Wild Cards. Logically, that should happen only if the top two performers are so well-matched that it's next to impossible to choose between them. But here it is clear that Ankita, though very good, was not AS GOOD AS Yana. It's a competition, right? The judges are not supposed to go by sentiment (and if they are, it's only fair that they extend their sentiment to Krushna too? Then why not have THREE wild cards??? 😆 ), they are supposed to choose the best. Yana was the best. Only she should have got in. Period.
coolpratz thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#10
.ankita has impressed judges being a non dancer... Yana is a trained dancer.... i dont hav any prblm of yana being trained or of her being on the show....but judges might hav considered the fact that anki is non dancer n is performing in everyone's level....

respect judges decision......👍🏼👏

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".