I should've got a second chance like Isha: Bharti - Page 7

I know everyone is talking about partiality but consider the following.

Err those who are saying that if Isha was saved by veto then Bharti and anyone else also deserves a chance...in any competition judges have only one chance to use their veto power. Once they've already utilized it they have no power. Otherwise each time a contestant is on the verge of elimination judges will use veto and the competition will never end...😆

don't agree with her...she was not the best dancer so second chance no way👎🏼

Originally posted by: swan20

Err those who are saying that if Isha was saved by veto then Bharti and anyone else also deserves a chance...in any competition judges have only one chance to use their veto power. Once they've already utilized it they have no power. Otherwise each time a contestant is on the verge of elimination judges will use veto and the competition will never end...😆

Thank you, at least someone understands the technicality of Veto 😆😆😆

I completely agree with all that you said. You pointed out some very obvious (though not that obvious to some) details. Bharti was in the bottom two!! She (like Karan Wahi, from last week) had to prove herself. She chose not too... It became very clear to her that she will not survive the dance off and had purposely not prepared the "Face-Off" dance. That, to me, is poor sportsmanship. Throughout the competition her highest score has been 27 and that compiting with those that have tasted perfect scores, time and again, is just not good enough.

You cannot complain about on-going pain (back pain, leg pain, etc) when you enter such format. Jhalak demands that from you - and you have to know this prior to entering. I felt her attitude towards the whole thing was very poor. And the only one that truly suffered was herself (and of course, Savio).

Originally posted by: simplypurple

I know everyone is talking about partiality but consider the following.

Isha COULD NOT perform because of her injury. Bharti CHOSE not to perform in the 'dance ka takkar'. She was prepared to dance in the regular rounds but she just refused to compete against Rashmi rather than say she just will not be able to compete at all. She didn't want to make any effort for that round. That was wrong.

If the dr.s truly asked her to take a complete break for dancing, why wouldn't she bring this up in the previous week or even mid-week?She showed up prepared to dance but just not for the face-off.

Perhaps it was unexpected for her but Rashmi said her landing in the bottom two was also shocking.The judges even gave Bharti an option to do the performance she has prepared in the face-off round. But, she refused saying she didn't want to put that much effort for this round. So why should the judges save her in such a situation when she is capable of dancing but just doesn't deem it necessary to dance to save herself from eliminations? At this, Karan said that she has accepted defeat in her heart and thus doesn't want to compete and I agree with him. It was obvious. She was afraid that judges will choose Rashmi's performance over hers so she never gave her own self a chance.

On top of that she said that she is the one who brings 50% of the show's TRP. That again came across very arrogant. Her jokes were funny at times but most times I really disliked what she did so I certainly didn't watch the show because of her. If anything, I watched the show for Salman and Isha.

More than Bharti, I'm going to miss Savio because he was a really good sport. He made Bharti look good with all the lifts and tricks he did.

Bharti is famous for her comedy so she doesn't need this show. Especially since she already considers herself a star. 😉 At least now the show will give the rest of the contests more limelight and a chance to shine.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

I think it's better to stick with Indian version of JDJ cuz that is what we see on stage. It is a done deal and channel doesn't have any issues. And just cuz someone is a dancer, undermining their hard work to put others on a pedestal is not a done deal. Shows how one can cover their favorite's weakness by doing so. For me everyone works hard one way or other. One might have to work hard in some department while others in some other. GC being an actor is pro at expressions while the same might not apply to Sushil or Bharti. So are we saying going to undermine GC's expression, I don't think so. So some come with good dancing skills, while other with expressions while someone else with some other aspect of the performance. But whatever floats your boat.

Cool so if we sent you in an operation theatre to work with a team of surgeons you'd do fine because you are a very hard working person, forget it, you'd even do great in a space station with astronuts (as long you work hard) 😃

In my world, a non-dancer with a trained dancer in a competition is unfair and secondly, rules should be respected as rules (yes even in India) where when a contestant does not perform not one week but multiple weeks, they should be judged accordingly

Originally posted by: aa123.80

My respect for Bharti has actually gone up way higher after what she said in yesterday's episode... This is what she gets for working so hard all these weeks, while somebody like Isha gets to sit out and make a comfortable comeback directly in the semis. JUST cause she has a plaster. How are the rules fair? Just cause Isha got so many 30s, the judges justify her being allowed to remain in the competition. But what about the hardwork others are putting? And if just those 30s matter, why have the audience vote when CLEARLY it doesn't count for anything?? What if everyone else also said that they're unwell and can't perform? What would've the judges done then?
And well, if they want us to believe Isha gets more votes than Bharti or Rashmi, actually enough to cover up for her consecutive zeros, then they're just satisfying themselves.

Originally posted by: suresh555

Cool so if we sent you in an operation theatre to work with a team of surgeons you'd do fine because you are a very hard working person, forget it, you'd even do great in a space station with astronuts (as long you work hard) 😃

In my world, a non-dancer with a trained dancer in a competition is unfair and secondly, rules should be respected as rules (yes even in India) where when a contestant does not perform not one week but multiple weeks, they should be judged accordingly

Veto is a format designed for this show to retain a deserving candidate and has been implemented since last season. Isha, a dancer, has been chosen by JDJ makers, has given good performances, injured, saved by votes and retained by judges using Veto. End of story from my end. You are most welcome to stick with your set of rules in your own factitious JDJ show 😃

P.S: Btw, you didn't get my point of hard work and in what context it was used. So I'll simply leave it to your imagination 😃