What was most unfair on jdj

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

3283

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#21

For me personally seeing non dancers in Top 5 or 4 is the most unfair thing on JDJ.

Quote

priya

@JugniPH

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 13 years ago

#22

all the listed things are same for me..

after all its a reality show..

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Vardah

@vardah23

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#23

its number two all the way..its totally unfair to cancel out the voting and the dance performance of isha and salman...

Quote

swan20

@swan20

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#24

Unfairness can't be ranked...if something is unfair it just is.

Isha staying on despite not performing is unfair

GC staying on solely on votes despite being an erratic performer and not showing consistent growth is unfair

Ritwik & Rashmi staying on despite coming into the show late is unfair (on contestants who are here since the beginning)

Bhart staying on only so that she could provide some comic relief and supposedly help the TRPs is unfair

Good dancers like Shibani ousted so early off is unfair

Judges giving out 30s as lollipops whether deserving or not is unfair.

So, the gist is this entire show is based on unfairness. The difference is fans of a particular contestant think that their favorite is the only deserving one while everything else is unfair...😆

Quote

3283

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: swan20
Unfairness can't be ranked...if something is unfair it just is.

Isha staying on despite not performing is unfair

GC staying on solely on votes despite being an erratic performer and not showing consistent growth is unfair

Ritwik & Rashmi staying on despite coming into the show late is unfair (on contestants who are here since the beginning)

Bhart staying on only so that she could provide some comic relief and supposedly help the TRPs is unfair

Good dancers like Shibani ousted so early off is unfair

Judges giving out 30s as lollipops whether deserving or not is unfair.

So, the gist is this entire show is based on unfairness. The difference is fans of a particular contestant think that their favorite is the only deserving one while everything else is unfair...😆

👍🏼 to everything you mentioned especially the bold one. I also do not understand how one can be more unfair than other. So I am on par with you on that.

@blue: 😆😆😆 Bingo. Wish more people are willing to accept their bias because end of the day that is what sets us apart.

Edited by -Chandramukhi- - 13 years ago

Quote

Alina

@-Alinaa-

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: sweetysumaiya
7.. The show is not about dancing.. Should be renamed perfomance with the stars.. Because i do not see any dancing anymore... I thought jdj was meant to bring different dance formats and open asian view into the world of dance,..foreign dance and everyone should learn to dance.. To me season 1 was so much better,,,

I wont talk about fairness, coz this is a ""reality show"".

But I can't agree more to your 7th point. It's not about fair/unfair, but the format of the show. Season 1 was better in terms of format. This year it had different themes every week, which were confusing and repetitive, which did not encourage participants to show different dance forms.

Quote

Priya

@priya185

Master

+ 44

Posted: 13 years ago

#27

anyday and in every way this wins it

2. Isha being given direct entry to semi finals (not sure if it was finals as well)

Quote

cuttiee

@cuttiee

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: sweetysumaiya
1. Bharti being kept in for trps...hence removing other great contestants off the show
2. Isha being given direct entry to semi finals (not sure if it was finals as well)
3. The wildcard entrys itself... Should it have just been the people who were from original 12 to stay and go all the way...
4. Any wildcard entry winning.
5. There being too much sympathy
6. There hardly has been any dancing at all and people get top marks..
7.. The show is not about dancing.. Should be renamed perfomance with the stars.. Because i do not see any dancing anymore... I thought jdj was meant to bring different dance formats and open asian view into the world of dance,..foreign dance and everyone should learn to dance.. To me season 1 was so much better,,,
This year is full of confusion and unfairness,,,and some viewers can see judges are biased... .. We neeed a show on dance... Not comedy or twisting nd turning or gymnsstics,,

Hence jhalak standard is lower... Next year this needs to be sorted

good post👏

Quote

Intellect01

@Intellect01

Beginner

Posted: 13 years ago

#29

Most unfair - Nothing more than the demoralizing and biased conduct by the judges towards the contestants with the inconsistent marking throughout and then the rude comments yesterday about the voting support, whereas a similar voting was highlighted as humungous public support for zero scores a week before. The show format, voting, non-dancers were atleast known facts to all before the show. (My POV)

Edited by -Intellect- - 13 years ago

Quote

Shruti_0505

@Shruti_0505

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#30

isha being given entry in semis and bharti for trps and obviously teh wild entries

one thing which i cannot understand is that with such a cast on her arm how does isha manage to wear such tight skin tight dresses?????
how does that go through her cast?????

another reason to believe that her injury is fake

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

What was most unfair on jdj - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics