I say no i rather see bharti gc or isha win coz they struggled and managed to stay in the competition even though karan ritvik and rashmi are fabulous. 😊
Healthy debates please.
BHAI & FAMILY 10.12
Paresh Rawal blasts Anupama Chopra over Dharundar Review.
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 1st T20I🏏
6 year leap promo : Tulsi-Mihir separation
negative reviews being pulled down 😭
Jatinder from PV calls out Harminder from BoI for bias against Ranveer
BoI aka Harminder ka tune change start hogaya!!!!
CHACHI vs CUTEY 11.12
Kritika Kamra Gaurav Kapur Confirm Relationship
Hrithik ‘praises’ Dhurandhar but he also disagrees with its politics
Alia Bhatt at the Red sea Festival
Aditya Dhar and Yami paid to troll
Shah Rukh Khan new video launching Danube property
December Reading Challenge & Christmas Reads- BT Page Log Thread
Kasam Se Banta Rishta ~ Ssharad Malhotra x Shivani Tomar SS
Film Critics Guild issues statement
Paresh Rawal deletes his distasteful tweet on Anupama Chopra
No I m not agree with u all... Its all about ur ability, tenant n how u performed... For eg. If everyone follow ur rule that older one who struggle more shld always win than as per u Ranbir kapoor must not had won the awards for rockstar as there was nomination of salman khan too for Wanted n dabang, through RK is fabulous n unbeatable in Rockstar. So its fair enough... If u r talented n work hard than it is not imp who comes I when comes...
I have always stayed with the thought i have about WC entries that YES there is nothing wrong in them winning.😊
Personally, i feel that WC or no WC, how does that make a difference? Someone who is not a WC has spent more weeks in the show- Fine , That person has struggled more for votes- Fine but how does that make anyone who is a WC not eligible to win? Is the time you spend working on something what defien your victory or is it how much you do in whatever time you have? Infact i believe that the WC's have to work 100 times harder then the non-WC's because they come late- They have lesser connection with the audience , the show, the format and the judges. They have lesser amount of stability to carry on ( Votes basis) .If we go this way then people who join a class late , say for example if I join grade 10 at the time of the last semester and not fromt he first semester and i Top despite of joining late( I work hard) then should i not deserve to be the topper? No right? So all that matter is how hard you work. Every kind of a contestant has there own set of pros and cons with them.So i say that WC or no WC - this has nothing to do with winning😊
In the top 6 50% of the contestants are wildcards who did not start the journey from day one. They definately have an advantage over the contestants who started training from day one. Would it be fair if they walked away winning the show instead of the contestants who dance really well but were not part of it from day one??
I say no i rather see bharti gc or isha win coz they struggled and managed to stay in the competition even though karan ritvik and rashmi are fabulous. 😊
Healthy debates please.