Originally posted by: Bluegrass
I know I have a PhD in literary criticism, so I will be a bit of a nerd. The way Shakespeare wrote it, Romeo and Juliet was a satire of young love which doesn't know the difference between love and infatuation and romanticises death in its garb. The play literally begins with Romeo being majnu over Juliet's cousin Rosaline and within days falls in love with Juliet who is 13.
They both die over a 'love' that didn't even last weeks.
So yeah, Adi is definitely like Romeo
Devdas is literally about colonisation and old money and Devdas is shown as developing alcoholism due to property dispute with his father. Paro plays a very ornamental role in the book.
Again, very much like Aditya. Toodles!
This is what happens when you don't read the entire thing!
Thanks for the (as usual pretentious) enlightenment but I already aware of the above as I have read Romeo & Juliet and Devdas cover to cover innumerable times (more than I care to admit).😆
Being a PhD in literary criticism, you are probably aware that literature deals with a whole host of characters, a lot them being flawed like Heathcliff and the Byronic heroes. The fact that their flawed natures are satirised and criticised by the author does not make them any less enigmatic for people. I'll even give the example of Prem from KZK who was another such troubled and flawed character who's love Mukti was killed off because Ekta felt that was his comeuppance. Despite his innumerable flaws (he even tried to rape Mukti), he enjoyed a large fanbase.
Interpretation is another such thing. I am sure you are also aware that literature can be interpreted in a whole range of ways and not just through a narrow point scoring feminist lens that is entailed on entitlement.😛Laughable and unrealistic things like making a 19 year old college girl CEO for a day which would be shot down so hard in the real world.😆
I am so glad Aditya is not like that.😆