Miscarriage? Jadugar ya Saudagar? - Page 3

Please Keep voting - the Star One article does not say NT will win and SBS maybe misleading😉

The title of the show is Geet and so it is the story of her struggle for her rights and how she is an inspiration to young women everywhere. It is not based on her romance with Maan alone. The baby is an integral part of the story.

She has sacrificed a lot for the baby. She chose to send her own brother to jail because he tried to kill her when she refused to terminate the pregnancy. It was her choice to keep the baby. Who are we to ask her to kill the baby? Does that mean that we do not respect her choice and are we reiterating the fact that women do not have a right to choose and only their families do? Remember even when she was fighting her feelings for Maan, she clearly put her baby first. Even while confessing she told him how important her responsibilities towards the baby are and that she intended to shoulder them. Maan's respects her because of this.

They say "Justice delayed is justice denied". Geet chose to deny herself justice by waiting for the baby to be born before doing a DNA test because it could harm the baby. That is how much she wants the baby. When forced to choose between the baby and justice, she chose her baby.Should this sacrifice be dishonored by showing a miscarriage track?

Geet gave Maan the right to be her baby's father. So Maan is the baby's father. He may not be the biological father but if he does not care about that why should you? This is a golden opportunity to show that broad-minded men do exist in this day and age. It also shows that if one brother destroyed her life, then the other stood by her during her struggles and helped her rebuild her life. Geet should win ultimately. She will be an inspiration to millions of young girls to fight against injustice and authority and to do what is right. If the baby dies Maan will blame himself for it and will be inconsolable and the realtionship will take a beating because both Maan and Geet will feel guilty. 😭

Questions have been raised about the hygiene and the challenges associated with bringing a child onto a TV set. If they CVs are concerned about this then they should not show Nayantara having something to do with the child's demise. This would defeat the purpose. Evil would win over good and this is unacceptable. Instead I would prefer that they showed that the baby's heart just stopped beating one day. In this case Geet is also very young so this is a possibility. It is also a great opportunity for the CVs to show that she succeeded in her struggles to keep the baby asave her baby but in the end god had other plans. They can use this as a platform to educate viewers about teenage pregnancies and the risks associated with them. They could have the doctor trying to console and bereft Geet and explain to her the challenges of a teenage pregnancy. I WOULD RATHER SEE THE BABY BORN BECAUSE THIS WOULD BE UNIQUE

Dev by virtue of being a man did not have to face the consequences of his mistake. He is being rewarded for his disgusting actions with a second chance at falling in love. I find that beyond disgusting and utterly represhensible. He is being rewarded for ruining a girl's life just because he repented? The gravity of his crime is such that he will have to spend a lifetime making this up to Geet by looking out for Maaneet and foiling the plans of his dear wife. I do not see too many people protesting against the Dev-Meera track instead they are intent on hurting innocents ' Geet and her baby which has not even entered this world. How people can harbor so much hate for an unborn innocent child and want it murdered is beyond me.

Well you have enumerated all the things which I wanted to say. Apart from this if baby on the sets is a problem, they can keep few scenes with the baby. ..... I was reading somewhere that once your baby has a heartbeat - usually visible on ultrasound at around 6 weeks - your odds of having a miscarriage drop significantly. So new chances of natural MC are rare at this point as Geet's pregnancy is around 3 months.

I am also having doubts that it's just a publicity stunt or a way to know the public reaction. My reasons are:

1. In the article it is said, "Hopefully this time I will be successful in getting my revenge as I can never forgive Maan and Geet and will never allow them to get married". Hopefully is a key word...it may not happen.

2. Here I'm pasting views of some people from fb page ( I also agree with these views); by SUPRIYA...whn she ask her BABAJI wht do with d child ( @ Gurudwara, swarnmandir), the answer was MAAN

by MANASHI...in the "pee loon".......... episode......... when maan was playing with the child........ geet touched her tummy and said......" babaji kuch kehna chahte ho aap"............. that was one of the most heart touching moments of the show ever............(GC was looking great & cute with that kid)

by SA'ADIA....she almost gave up love--maan's love--for the love of her baby... how she tried her level best to stop his advances for the sake of her baby. and it was only after he accpeted her child that she fully accepted his love.

I'm also against MC after marriage because it is very difficult to forget such a thing in life. It can cause serious problems in their relationship. If baby dies because of NT Maan won't be able to forgive himself.

In my opinion it would be foolishness to show MC it this point.

MY anticipation regarding MC:

It won't happen as per Swati's interview (as they have decided to tackle this issue seriously). If they show NT trying to harm Geet ....& she's being hospitalised, I think in that situation Maan would ask the doctor to lie about MC so that NT can be deceived till their marriage. They'l dupe NT so that their marriage can happen. It fits according to the SBS news.

Mrs.MSK 🤣 and Sweety - i will reply to u both personally later