Posted:
Tan
Great to see you here again!Our point is that either both Jambavan and Jambavati should be shown human, or both should be shown as bears. But showing one of them as human and the other as a bear doesn't make sense.I agree w/ you on the other aspect - I think there were some years differences b/w Rukmini's marriage and the Syamantaka gem. In fact, Krishna's war w/ Paundra Vasudev may have taken place during this time, b'cos when Krishna sent his discus after a fiery monster sent against Dwarka by Paundra's ally, he was playing dice w/ Rukmini. Normally, he'd spend his time w/ Satyabhama, so chances are that that war took place b4 the Syamanataka episodes.Oh, & on the rest, don't get us started - the way they've distorted both Krishna's & Rukmini's character has just been unbelievable. Krishna talks all the time about love, Rukmini cries every time she hears that he's in danger, and has no faith in his ability to protect even himself... It's hard to believe that the Sagars are the ones creating this stuff. But of late, their authenticity has gone from bad to worse.
hey vrish, good to be here too, actually ever since that guy committed suicide and they showed balram acting like an arse, and maat devki asking stuff, which seemed like a teenage girls tantrums, i have stopped watching the show. i only read here and thats why told u guys why i felt jamvabati was shown human, i didnt know her father was shown as a bhalu
eeks
well sagars were never really authentic to begin with, the go more for high voltage drama and their own interpretation of stuff, like whatb they believe and they think is correct and try to feed us that, its alays been like that, even in ramayan. thats why i like Mahabharat much, it was not pitch perfect, but atleast it went majorly with what we have read and have been told for days.
lets hope they come back to their senses once again.
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
Sensational South
Bigg Boss 19
