Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 27
Bigg Boss 19 Daily Discussion Thread - 12th Sept 2025
KIARA EXPOSED 11.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 12, 2025 EDT
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- BD vs HK 3rd Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi 🏏
HUM JEET GAYE 12.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Pak vs Oman 4th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
Is it just me or…
MAJOR REVAMP TIME FOR STAR PLUS
Patrama Prem ~ A Gosham SS ~ Chapter 4 on pg 2
Anupamaa 12 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
The 71st National Film Awards are September 23 in Delhi
Aabeer Gulaal reviews and box office
Addressing the first part of your discussion, would Shonitpur then be anywhere near the kingdom of Kauravya (father of Uloopi)? After all, Uloopi was a Naga, while Chitravahana was the ruler of Manipur, which was close enough that when Uloopi was depressed @ being abandoned by Arjun, she went to Manipur and spent her time w/ Chitrangada & Babruvahana.
Incidentally, how did Shonitpur come into the discussion - was that Banasura's kingdom? If Bali had turned over his entire domains to Vamana, how could Banasura have had a kingdom anywhere on earth? And how did he get to be its king, if his father Bali was very much alive?Also, is there anything in any of the scriptures to suggest that Banasura was resentful @ Vishnu over Vamana depriving his father of his justly won possessions? I find it strange that Bali was pretty devoted to Vishnu, while Banasura made it a point to make enemies w/ Krishna. Bali would seem to have no influence w/ Banasura.
Incidentally, how did Shonitpur come into the discussion - was that Banasura's kingdom? If Bali had turned over his entire domains to Vamana, how could Banasura have had a kingdom anywhere on earth? And how did he get to be its king, if his father Bali was very much alive?