Originally posted by: Vibhishna
Anything information Mahabharat or Krishna is welcome here unless it creates an undesirable situation.
I have heard of the tales but its not only Alli Rani, the Pandya Queen, they mention.
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 13th Sep 2025 - WKV
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Pak vs Oman 4th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
HUM JEET GAYE 12.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 13, 2025 EDT
PARAYI AURAT 13.9
Aabeer Gulaal reviews and box office
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 Ban vs Sri Lanka, 5th Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi🏏
Tanya was fab today👏🏻
Two contradictory dialgues in single episode? Aurton se Rude nai hona?
Anupamaa 13 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Who is this actor?
Silences Between Hearts ~ A Rumya SS ~ Chapter 4 on pg 1
Katrina won't announce her pregnancy, is she?
Prayansh Aransh Anpi FF: Swapnakoodu
Originally posted by: Vibhishna
Anything information Mahabharat or Krishna is welcome here unless it creates an undesirable situation.
I have heard of the tales but its not only Alli Rani, the Pandya Queen, they mention.
Vanadhi
Ugrasena & Vasudev were very much alive - in the MB, when Arjun was on his Ashwamedha yagna & the horse went thru Dwarka, some Yadava yutes captured the horse, but rather than battle them, Arjun asked Ugrasena & Vasudev to mediate, and they persuaded them to release the horse.In the MB, after Daruka got Arjun to Dwarka, Vasudev, after handing over control of everybody to him, died, and Arjun did his funeral, as well as that of the dead. In SB, Vasudev, Ugrasena, Devaki and all their wives died on seeing Krishna's & Balarama's bodies. The description of the ends of the Yadavas & the Pandavas is different b/w Mahabharata & Shrimad Bhagvatam. In the former, no mention is made of when or how Ugrasena died, although it's implied, since Arjun handed over power to Vajra.Krishna, afaik, never sat on the throne of Dwarka, but was nonetheless its de facto ruler. Ugrasena was the titular head of that coalition of Yadavas, Vrishnis, Andhakas and so on. You may want to read most of the posts of this thread starting from I think pg 7, then you'll get a complete picture.
Ascendent Tauras (Vrishbha) Interpretations Moon in Tauras in the First House Ketu (Dragon's tail) in the First House Sun in Leo in the First House Mercury in Virgo in the Fifth House Venus in Libra in the Sixth House Saturn in Libra in the Sixth House Rahu (Dragon's head) in the Seventh House Mars in Capricorn in the Ninth House Jupiter in Pisces in the Eleventh House [From Essence of Hindu Sidereal Astrology |
Very good analysis.Yes you are correct in your understanding of Paundrak / Srigalva Vasudev.Paundrak's story appears in SB. He is said to be the ruler of a kingdon called Karusa, near Kashi. In this story, first Paundrak sends an envoy to Dwaraka, asking Krishna to surender his chakra. After a hearty laugh, Krishna marches to Karusha and defeats and kills Paundrak and his ally Kashiraj.In HariVamsa, this episode takes place after Krishna/ Balarama defeat Jarashandha. I had described this episode here
Shivang & VaraaliI imported your discussion here, so that we can continue...On your question above, I read Karusa as being Paundrak's kingdom, but somewhere else, I read about it actually being Dantavatra's. Any idea which kingdom Dantavatra ruled? Also, in the above, Vidarbha & Magadha were kingdoms, like you said, with capitals of Kundinpur & Rajgriha; Rukmi moved the capital to Bhojakot. Avanti was the kingdom whose capital is UjjainI thought Avantika was just another name of the city Ujjain and not the name of region (And Girivraja capital name of Magadh I read in the novel rather than Rajgriha).Kashi contained Varanasi and Pragjyotisha was Assam, while Karna's Anga was North Bengal, Sikkim, those places. Dunno what the capital was. Chedi was in MP, and it was the first place Bhima went to after he killed Jarasandha, & Sishupala welcomed his new overlord 😈 hoping to have an ally the same way he had Jarasandha. So I'd put it in the Bundelkhand/Gwalior region of the state.This entire analysis is perfect and I agree with you.On Vidarbha, Kundinpur is where Amravati is today, and I dunno where Bhojakot is.If you search in google map Amjhera near Indore, that's where Gauri mandir is from Rukmini was abducted as people say.While Vidarbha may have been a large kingdom, I don't think it included areas that are today in Marathwada or Konkan - Kolhapur is not in Vidarbha, and probably wasn't. Nasik probably was.Exactly. That's my point. I can't imagine Kolhapur to be Kundinpur. But this is how many internet sources say - both to be synonyms of each other. One of today and one of MB times. This is the main and real part of my doubt.I sometimes wonder whether the Shalva who Bheeshma humiliated & couldn't marry Amba was the same as the one who laid waste to Dwarka, was defeated by Pradhyumna and ultimately slain by Krishna. B'cos in SB, he's described as a danav, whereas the person Amba wanted to marry seemed a mediocre warrior by comparison. It's true that Shalva did some tapasya to Mahadev to be able to get ultimate weapons to defeat Dwarka, but I can't imagine Amba falling in love w/ a danav. And in SB, after Krishna killed him, he sent his discus to destroy Saubhya, which seemed to be a spaceship, rather than a geographic terrain 😆 But if it was geographic, I'd think it would have been somewhere in Kutch - somewhere that Shalva could have got to b4 Krishna could get there from Indraprastha.Same doubt here. I am with you (as man in doubt looking for answer 😆). And Shaalva desh is also somewhere in north of Kachchha - Mahamarusthal desert including Kachchha and Rajasthan areas right.I had asked a question here about Kashi. Can anyone see it and discuss that there?Same here. I saw your question post before seeing this link (when Varaali posted the link of her Shrungalav post). Again I am with you word to word asking the same doubt but no answer.And so Karveerpur was not in Karnataka or in South India? Was that same as Paundra capital in East? That's the biggest question of the lot. Where was Gomantak? Not in Goa? Is that the conclusion from the other page of that link? If it was not in Goa then Krishna went far east from Gomantak to reach Shrungalav?!!!!!!!!!!😲 He actually was very close to his capital as per Harivansh!!! This is exactly the point (point of geography) where researchers are in two minds I suppose - whether Shrungalav is same as Paundrak or not (and also Shrungalav's dynasty described). And what were the names of their fathers? I read somewhere it to be Vasudev only (in case of one of them of course).
Following is the KMG translation of Adi Parva which provides a very strange list of people who were present in Draupadi swayamvar (Dhrishtdhyumna even says a step ahead that they all came for Draupadi - a statement if generalized, produces very weird and strange conclusions). My question is - What was the age of Arjun/Krishna, all Krishna's famous sons (2-3 of them) and Aniruddha at the time of Draupadi swayamvar, Dhyutkrida and Kurukshetra war or such major events? How older Uttar was than Uttaraa (Shankh and Uttar are mentioned but 3rd brother Shwet is not mentioned here)? How much elder Krishna was than Subhadra? In BRC MB, Uttar is shown younger than Uttaraa.
(Swayamvara Parva continued)
"Dhrishtadyumna said, 'Duryodhana, Durvisaha, Durmukha and Dushpradharshana, Vivinsati, Vikarna, Saha, and Duhsasana; Yuyutsu and Vayuvega and Bhimavegarava; Ugrayudha, Valaki, Kanakayu, and Virochana, Sukundala, Chitrasena, Suvarcha, and Kanakadhwaja; Nandaka, and Vahusali, and Tuhunda, and Vikata; these, O sister, and many other mighty sons of Dhritarashtra--all heroes--accompanied by Karna, have come for thy hand. Innumerable other illustrious monarchs all bulls among Kshatriyas--have also come for thee. Sakuni, Sauvala, Vrisaka, and Vrihadvala,--these sons of the king Gandhara--have also come. Foremost of all wielders of weapons--the illustrious Aswatthaman and Bhoja, adorned with every ornament have also come for thee. Vrihanta, Manimana, Dandadhara, Sahadeva, Jayatsena, Meghasandhi, Virata with his two sons Sankha and Uttara, Vardhakshemi, Susarma, Senavindu, Suketu with his two sons Sunama and Suvarcha, Suchitra, Sukumara, Vrika, Satyadhriti, Suryadhwaja, Rochamana, Nila, Chitrayudha, Agsuman, Chekitana, the mighty Sreniman, Chandrasena the mighty son of Samudrasena, Jarasandha, Vidanda, and Danda--the father and son, Paundraka Vasudeva, Bhagadatta endued with great energy, Kalinga, Tamralipta, the king of Pattana, the mighty car-warrior Salya, the king of Madra, with his son, the heroic Rukmangada, Rukmaratha, Somadatta of the Kuru race with his three sons, all mighty chariot-fighters and heroes, viz., Bhuri, Bhurisrava, and Sala, Sudakshina, Kamvoja of the Puru race, Vrihadvala, Sushena, Sivi, the son of Usinara, Patcharanihanta, the king of Karusha, Sankarshana (Valadeva), Vasudeva (Krishna), the mighty son of Rukmini, Samva, Charudeshna, the son of Pradyumna with Gada, Akrura, Satyaki, the high-souled Uddhava, Kritavarman, the son of Hridika, Prithu, Viprithu, Viduratha, Kanka, Sanku with Gaveshana, Asavaha, Aniruddha, Samika, Sarimejaya, the heroic Vatapi Jhilli Pindaraka, the powerful Usinara, all these of the Vrishni race, Bhagiratha, Vrihatkshatra, Jayadratha the son of Sindhu, Vrihadratha, Valhika, the mighty charioteer Srutayu, Uluka, Kaitava, Chitrangada and Suvangada, the highly intelligent Vatsaraja, the king of Kosala, Sisupala and the powerful Jarasandha, these and many other great kings--all Kshatriyas celebrated throughout the world--have come, O blessed one, for thee. Endued with prowess, these will shoot the mark. And thou shalt choose him for thy husband who amongst these will shoot the mark."
As per the following research, Arjun was of the age of 37 years at the time of Draupadi Swayamvar (Point 24 - 44th Vedic calendar year Sadharna) and Pandavas stayed in Hidimbvan (Western India) + Ekchakra nagari (Northern/Central India more towards east - Kashi-Magadh) for 2-3 years (Keelak to Sadharna). And Arjun's age was 58 years (Pramodhoota) when Abhimanyu was born and 87 years old when Abhimanyu married to Uttaraa and Kurukshetra war took place (as per the link below).
http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/mahabharat/mahab_patnaik.html
Now I can't imagine Pradhyumn's son even born when Arjun didn't marry even Draupadi so someone could just help me compiling these different sources of knowledge. The above references lead us to conclude that Krishna was grandfather at the age of 37. He already had gone through the kand of Syamantak mani, kidnapping of Pradhyumn and fight with Narkasur-Mur (not just his marriages with Rukmini, Jambuvati and Satyabhama). Notice that Bhagdatta's name is also mentioned above in the list but not Narkasur. Krishna killed Kans at the age somewhere between 11 to 15 let's say and then immediately went to Sandipani. And then everything happened (Jarasandh wars and Dwarika nirman and marriages) happened during 20-25 years only. Now let's Krishna married to Rukmini at the age of 18-20; and even if there is just the difference of 2 years between marriage of Krishna-Rukmini and marriage of Pradhyumn (As he was straightaway made young through Sanjeevani vidhya and supposedly became very much of the same age as that of Krishna), then only Aniruddha (And Saamb) could be of the age around 15 at the time of Draupadi swayamvar. But now this is to analyse Saamb's age (which can even be less than Aniruddha) from Anushasan Parva:
"Vasudeva said, 'Hear, ye foremost of Brahmana's and thou Yudhishthira also, O sire, and hear thou too, O Ganga's son, the names that are applied unto Kaparddin. Hear ye, how in former days, I obtained a sight, so difficult to obtain, (of that great god), for the sake of Samva. Verily, in those days was the illustrious deity seen by me in consequence of Yoga-abstraction.[36] After twelve years had expired from the time when Pradyumna, the son of Rukmini, who is endued with great intelligence, slew the Asura Samvara in days of yore, my spouse Jamvavati addressed me. Indeed, beholding Pradyumna and Charudeshna and other sons born of Rukmini, Jamvavati, desirous of a son, said these words unto me, O Yudhishthira,--Grant me, O thou of unfading glory, a son endued with heroism, the foremost of mighty men, possessed of the most agreeable features, sinless in conduct, and like unto thyself. And O, let there be no delay on thy part in granting this prayer of mine. There is nothing in the three worlds that is unattainable by thee, O perpetuator of Yadu's race, thou canst create other worlds if only thou wishest it. Observing a vow for twelve years and purifying thyself, thou hadst adored the Lord of all creatures (viz., Mahadeva) and then begot upon Rukmini the sons that she has obtained from thee, viz., Charudeshna and Sucharu and Charuvesa and Yasodhana and Charusravas and Charuyasas and Pradyumna and Sambhu. O slayer of Madhu, do thou grant to me a son like unto those of great powers whom thou hast begotten upon Rukmini?
Now the above paragraph indicates that Pradhyumn was born at least after 12 years of Krishna's marriage with Rukmini (so my earlier assumption above of 2 years difference is wrong), and at least after 12 years from Pradhyumn, Krishna started the penance for Saamb and adding another 12 years presumingly (I didn't try to read the part far further down after not finding it nearby), it makes 36 years of difference itself between Rukmini's marriage and Saamb's birth. So it is not possible that Krishna's age was just 37 at the time of Draupadi's swayamvar. Now the two paragraphs which I posted are from the same source (Mahabharat KMG translation). Krishna's childhood and Pandava's childhood were similar (in Vraj and in forest without education) with Krishna's childhood likely to be a bit longer and Krishna's education is likely to be quick and faster than Pandavas. Pandavas then went on vijay yatra during the years between Rangbhoomi (episodes around Gurudakshina given to Sandipani and Dron in BRC MB) and Lakshagruh. These were probably the years during which many of Krishna's independent stories of Harivansh and Shrimad Bhaagwat (And MahaBharat flashback stories) took place.
Another point is that Paundrak was there in Draupadi swayamvar and he also met Hanumanji as per the story shown in R SK (Hanumanji met Bheem and Arjun in Vanparva - I don't know why in SK they have shown both Arjun and Bheem meeting Hanumanji in get up with crown unlike MB) so he was killed by Krishna after even Dhyutkrida (Just after the war with Shaalva) and Draupadi vastraharan (It is worth checking Paundrak's name in Rajsuya yagna parva) but Narkaasur, Shambharasur and Shrungalav were killed before Draupadi swayamvar (And Shrungalav even before Rukmini's marriage). So clearly with that (apart from Geography and dynasty logic), Shrungalav is different from Paundrak if we compile various sources together (SB, MB and Harivansh with former 2 having reference of Paundrak and latter having reference of Shrungalav). Also it seems clear that Paundrak was there along with Krishna at a common public place and occasion and was also there part of Jarasandh's alliance army (As per SB) whereas Shrungalav impliedly or secretly supported Jarasandh in Gomantak by not giving shelter to Krishna in Karveerpur (Possibly never met Krishna before but may have heard about his charisma and influence over people). One can say that they had seen Krishna and people's fanism, faith and devotion for him at common public places and out of great jealousy, they initiated the same within their limited circle of countrymen (both Paundrak and Shrungalav did the same thing or followed the same psychology or behaviour of imitating Krishna).