🏏IPL 2026: GT vs KKR, 60th Match, Kolkata on 16/05/2026🏏
Episode dtd 15.5
🏏IPL 2026: PBKS vs RCB , 61st Match, at Dharamsala on 17/05/2026🏏
Anupamaa 16 May 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Episode dtd 16.5
What do you think guys?
What the colossal Fk
🏏IPL 2026: DC vs RR , 62nd Match, at Delhi on 17/05/2026🏏
Addressing the first part of your discussion, would Shonitpur then be anywhere near the kingdom of Kauravya (father of Uloopi)? After all, Uloopi was a Naga, while Chitravahana was the ruler of Manipur, which was close enough that when Uloopi was depressed @ being abandoned by Arjun, she went to Manipur and spent her time w/ Chitrangada & Babruvahana.
Incidentally, how did Shonitpur come into the discussion - was that Banasura's kingdom? If Bali had turned over his entire domains to Vamana, how could Banasura have had a kingdom anywhere on earth? And how did he get to be its king, if his father Bali was very much alive?Also, is there anything in any of the scriptures to suggest that Banasura was resentful @ Vishnu over Vamana depriving his father of his justly won possessions? I find it strange that Bali was pretty devoted to Vishnu, while Banasura made it a point to make enemies w/ Krishna. Bali would seem to have no influence w/ Banasura.
Incidentally, how did Shonitpur come into the discussion - was that Banasura's kingdom? If Bali had turned over his entire domains to Vamana, how could Banasura have had a kingdom anywhere on earth? And how did he get to be its king, if his father Bali was very much alive?