Should parvati also question Shiv?

When sati tested Lord Ram in the disguise of Sita,Shiv got angry with her saying that he consideres Lakshmi/Sita as his mother and she did wrong by going there in the disguise of sita.

as far as I understand, shiv ko is baat se samasya nahi thi ki sati Ram ke paas kyun gayin...though he tried to stop her coz sumwhere he knew that it wud lead to anarth but the main problem was sati taking the form of sita...shiv considered sita as his mata so it was impossible for him to accept sati as his vamangi again because ek pal ke liye hi sahi but sati ka darja shiv ki nazaron mein mata saman ho gaya tha...that was the main prob...but haan agar shiv kisi ke paas himvan ya daksh ban kar chale jate toh may be parvati unka bahishkar kar sakti thi...shiv never questioned his wife on the aspect of patni dharm aur streetva...you will see later that when Parvati will go to shumbh Nishumbh's nagari she will go in a very attractive form to kill dhumralochan ... but then shiv won't have a prob because us time bhi woh unki wife hi thi...shiv and Parvati had a very stong bond of trust u see😊...shiv's anger was only because sati took the form of sita

I agree a question can be framed that way. The approach to that Sati - Ram episode was flawed. I did not like the fact that the right of being a Vahamangi could be snatched from Devi Sati. Lord Shiva's personality is too magnanimous for that.

Well i don't think too much 🤣 🤣