Naah, the animal sacrifice discussion is much more interesting 😆 Thanks for bringing it up 👍🏼 - gives me the opportunity to continue hijacking this thread w/ this topic 😈
I'm not sure that it's right to make the issue of killing animals an ethical issue (unless one is PETA and wants to go through the 'meat is murder' slogan of theirs). Animals don't have rights the way people do, since they don't (and can't) make and keep agreements. Ever seen the Discovery Channel, or National Geographic channels, of cheetahs, hyenas, lions etc and the way they hunt down gazelles, zebras, gnus and a whole bunch of other animals? Essentially, what that illustrates is that they are part of the food chain. If we shouldn't hunt lions, they shouldn't hunt zebras, who in turn shouldn't. hunt plants... See where I'm getting @?
In fact, some texts also have it that animals, when killed for being eaten, get reborn into higher life forms i.e. humans. Don't recall where I read this, or which texts have it, but it's there. Just like humans keep getting reborn until they come to a point that they attain moksha. For the animals, this ladder is taller.
In fact, the Ashwamedha yagna - the famous horse sacrifice that was I think first done by Indra to atone for the killing of Vritra, and then performed by kshatriyas ever since - was an yagna done to propriate Mahadev, and cover a wide variety of sins, from Brahmhatya to a whole range of others. At the end of it all, the horse was sacrificed in the yagna, and its meat was distributed as prasad. As noted above, religious practices do evolve, and a lot of temples do substitute coconuts for goats, but aside from the suffering of the animals - something that can be mitigated when they are anesthetized b4 being slaughtered - there ain't a compelling reason why it's okay to offer fruits instead of animals.
This is not meant to make fun of people who are against it, just that I wanted to point out that animal rights isn't a strong argument to go against it.