Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread-2nd Dec, 2025
FAMILY TREE 3.12
FAKE FIGHTS 2.12
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 2nd ODI🏏
Yrkkh gen 3 feud - new low 📯
Dhurandhar - Advance Bookings Open
5000 episodes of YRKKH
What made you guys start watching?
Tribute To Legacy
Dr Kaira Chapter Discussions Thread
Rana Daggubati and Dulquer Salmaan disagrees with Deepika’s demands
Ranveer Singh Apologises
Trending everywhere that media has problem with Jai Shri Ram
Downfall Of Govinda
🎄 Elves of the Bookshelves 🎄 | BTRC • December 2025
2nd December episode Discussion thread
🎅🏼 Santas Of Storyland 🎄Dec 2025 Book Talk
Journalist talks about experience interviewing Kriti Sanon
🌟Gingerbread Page Turners 🎄BTRC December 2025🌟
The days of friendship and love Season4 SS IshVi RishRee
Blasphemy!!! I just saw friday's episode. Both Tarakasur & Vidyunmali know that parvati is the reincarnation of Sati. They have both referred to Sati as "Mata" previously. They are also aware of the fact that Parvati is an avatar of Goddess Shakti. Then how can they even THINK of getting Vidyunmali and Parvati married? It is like consciously wanting to marry the "MOTHER GODDESS". Shakti is a mother to everyone; including the Asurs.
Originally posted by: Vibhishna
A legend of the Mahavidhyas says that a person is pure till he/she reaches the age of 16 (that is why there is such a fuss about the number 16).
This is not the reason. The 3rd Mahavidya Shodashi Tripurasundari is worshipped as a 16 year old, who is always eager to unite with Shivji. The 16 lettered mantra of ShriVidya is considered to be of great importance. She is Parvati, who marries Shivji, is also called Lailta Tripursundari.
Originally posted by: Vibhishna
Oh... I read that Shodashi was worshiped as a 16 year old girl because till 16, a person is considered free from impurities. It is after the age of 16 that a person is affected by all the evils of life.
I personally think this "impure" and "ayogya" concept that DKDM harps on is basically a Christian construct - the concept of "original sin" that even a newborn baby is born with and must be rid of by christening, baptism etc etc.
I don't really think this exists in Hindu philosophy..if yes, please correc t me.
I personally think this "impure" and "ayogya" concept that DKDM harps on is basically a Christian construct - the concept of "original sin" that even a newborn baby is born with and must be rid of by christening, baptism etc etc.
I don't really think this exists in Hindu philosophy..if yes, please correc t me.