Apart from Hinduism,every religion is secular in India?

Page

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

Why is USA now lecturing India about supposed growing intolerance? What about their favourite ally Saudi Arabia? Why don't they lecture them?

Some people, probably psychos were involved in the Dadri incident. Many Hindus are killed by Muslims in India every year. Everyone knows about the ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Yet, 1 incident means all Muslims are unsafe? Some cow smuggling Muslims killed this Hindu man. Yet, media is not saying that Hindus are unsafe.

So called rationalists like Kalburgi are killed by some unknown people. And again, this is an example of growing intolerance in India according to media.

Does media have their investigators everywhere? Their investigators are better than official police investigators also?

How did media know who killed Kalburgi? How did they know who were the killers in Dadri and what were the reasons? How do they know before Indian security agencies also that a boat which blows itself up off indian shores carries peacemakers from Pakistan?

So called rationalists like Kalburgi, Dabholkar and the types insult Hindus every which way. They say they are going to piss on Hindu idols and prove that the idol can do them no harm.

Why don't they do this on idols of Jesus and Virgin Mary and then test what the idol will do to prove their rationale? Why such people who hurt the sentiments and faith of a billion people are called as eminent protectors of freedom of religion.

In India, an ex CJI made some remarks against Mahatma Gandhi. And entire media and parliament were up in arms. But such "rationalists" pass remarks against Hindu gods all the time and it becomes freedom of speech.

What is so rational about the secular religions? Why don't the "rationalists" talk about the brilliant scientific Creation theory. After all, the world was created at 9am on 14th October 4004 BC according to them.

In India, Hindus are supposedly the majority religion but they have zero privileges.

Quote

Frequent Posters

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

The picture is of the Hindu man killed.

So is Hinduism the only non-secular religion in India?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

media cherrypicks.

it only highlights cases where muslims or christians are killed. hindus dont matter to them.

also they want to show modi in a bad light.

Quote

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: mr.ass
media cherrypicks.

it only highlights cases where muslims or christians are killed. hindus dont matter to them.

also they want to show modi in a bad light.

It's worse than that. Some thieve steal a few thousand rupees from a church and this also becomes about tolerance. Obama then lectures India. Much more is stolen from Hindu temples but they never cry about growing intolerance.

The indian media does question mark reporting. no other country allows this kind of perception management.

Why is Jaitley a media darling? Before the cabinet was formed, media already knew who was going to get which portfolio.

We know who media wants as Indian PM. We know who will be made PM if something happens to Modi. Have you read the rubbish mushy piece by that lobbyist Suhel Seth (My Friend Arun) who says "Thank God India was a slave for 800 years otherwise we wouldn't have railways and kebabs".

Indian intelligence agencies know how peabrained Suhel Seth types get to hang out with Prince Charles and the likes and how they make such frequent foreign jaunts.

Quote

holychicken

@holychicken

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

Apart from hindutva force like rss and its sister fanatic org ,hindu religion is secular which hv everthing in it even as far as charvak . The topic should be hindu vs hindutva.

Quote

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: holychicken
Apart from hindutva force like rss and its sister fanatic org ,hindu religion is secular which hv everthing in it even as far as charvak . The topic should be hindu vs hindutva.

rss often works in muslim dominated villages and helps them. the media has highlighted them in a very bad way. if u said bajrang dal or vishwa hindu parishad with its togadia type of ppl then yes they are fanatic.

muslim bodies like in kerala hyderabad are much worse! media does not highlight them.

only by looking at hindu extremists people's opinions will get affected.

Quote

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/BJP-seeks-CBI-probe-in-Prashant-Poojary-murder/articleshow/49484192.cms

A Hindu flower seller who opposed cow slaughter was hacked in front of his shop by a Muslim mob.

Why Rahul Gandhi and Kejriwal and other sickulars are not going to Moodbirdi to see his family?

Why pseudo intellectual writers don't return their awards now?

WHy President Pranab Mukherjee is not giving useless lecture now? He did nothing when the Parliament session was washed out by a party with minimal seats.

Why Azam Khan is not writing to UN?

Melinda Gates is not shocked? WHy?

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

the only way to be secular in india is

1. take care of minority feelings and insecurity means yielding to their requests

2. No yielding to majority requests if there is ambiguity around its impact on minorities...

nothing wrong with either.. this i how it is in the US

Quote

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: qwertyesque
the only way to be secular in india is
1. take care of minority feelings and insecurity means yielding to their requests
2. No yielding to majority requests if there is ambiguity around its impact on minorities...

nothing wrong with either.. this i how it is in the US

while the points seem perfectly reasonable, why are they both catering towards minorities? what about minority requests which are unreasonable? like in uttar pradesh, we have a case where statues of swami vivekananda covered in a cloth in order to avoid "hurting muslim sentiments" there is a difference between minority protection and muslim foot kissing. I suspect thats how it is in the usa.

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: mr.ass

while the points seem perfectly reasonable, why are they both catering towards minorities? what about minority requests which are unreasonable? like in uttar pradesh, we have a case where statues of swami vivekananda covered in a cloth in order to avoid "hurting muslim sentiments" there is a difference between minority protection and muslim foot kissing. I suspect thats how it is in the usa.

this should be dealt with care..this was nothingn more than to cause riot and unrest.. and dissonance...but again there are cases which should be handled with care since turning down minority requests can amount to exploiting them..or imposing majority life beliefs on them Given the lack of education amongst minorities - its an unfortunate case of yielding to unreasonable demands.. not much there.. push back might work some of the time.. but how long.. for hat we need strong law and order implemented like in the US where minorities cant get anything outside the legal boundaries clearly defined.

Edited by qwertyesque - 9 years ago