::Sunny Side Up::#4{Strictly Invite Only} - Page 24

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

47k

Users

11

Likes

2.2k

Frequent Posters

Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: dey.bh

Thank you @ Ecrj

I so agree about twinklr khanna. She is a highly overrated writer also. She is hardly funny.


Yes Dey

There are so many authors better than her and yet, they go unnoticed cos they arent Akshay Kumar's relatives or spouse.

But to be fair, I do like her columns, although she is more scrawny lately and not satirical.
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: dennisdmenace

So someone has given a piece of her mind to twinkle khanna. Saw it coming though. Why do these celebs forget the age old advice of people living in glass house blah blah. Though the language could have been a little more polished.

This akshay Kumar has become holier than thou. Together they are couple goal. Why do they always feel that public is gullible?
Twinkle can crack a little joke on herself as an actress and she thinks herself as a literary genius.


Anu ji

Your sarcasm is so palpable. And tbh, taking digs on one and all is not being sarcastic.

Btw I always wanted to ask you , why do you have this particular click of Sobti as your DP?
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: chicksoup


More than damsel in distress... I agree it should have been executed better, but I didn't mind the plot.
Narottam will never get into Satrupa's good books. I don't think that is sudha's plan. She wants Anami to have Marne maarnewaali nafrat for Lal Mahal and use her as the ladder to LM. So, Narottam's part is to make sure Anami is alive, and gather any info that can help them tackle Pujan. Or.. worse still, what if she implicates Baldev here?!

Narottam is the shadow that is ever present in Satrupa 'S children's lives. He knows what is happening to them, yet he doesn't lift a finger to change anything. He is looking for snippets of information he can use.

Satrupa will never melt towards Narottam until the core issues between her and Baldev are sorted out.

Soup ji

I know that Satrupa wont melt for Narottam, never soon. But then what I meant was that Sudha can ask Narottam to sane Anami and perhaps, win trust of Anami and try to thaw Satrupa's unmoving heart to an extent that she gives him a benefit of doubt. How about that? 😉
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: dennisdmenace

My two cents on kangana. She is talented but anchor less. Bollywood is a nasty place for regular middle class people. Behind the flashbulbs and glitter it is lonely, selfish and cruel place. You can't trust anyone. So the presence of strong family and friend support matters. I think kangana made her own way up. And obviously met wolves like Aditya pancholi and likes. She was not guided properly how to deal with them. And see where it lead to?


Wow, that was deep !!

But yes, that can be true and since, she seems to rely too much on her sis, who otherwise doesnt know a thing on tackling issues, KR has largely been on her own, with her sis in tow.

Anu, the deal with Aditya was written about extensively and KR has spoken about taking the bait willingly. I dont see her as a victim there.

Tbh, its a doggy dog world, and unless you are wiling to let go, and overlook, its not your cup of tea. And that applies to men and women both.
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: dennisdmenace

I am never up to date with RKC. 😭

Though this much I can say that I never thought gayatri will have a positive impact on me. I like her role as grandmother.
Adhiraj saying sorry was cute. Ila was very unprofessional but completely ok like a girl in love.😉


You seem to love the show and you are only an epi behind, imo.

Gayatri and positive? That is like saying that women in politics and business arent ruthless. What she did with Sudha was downright mean, but I love the character.
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: chicksoup

Ecri,

I haven't been fortunate enough to watch an Indian show or movie or a book that explains love. The closest I have watched is, Zindagi Gulzar Hai.

I think people have varied definitions for love. Self seeking comes into the definition, when we put I in love first. You know those quotes which say in order to say I love you, you should be able to say I first. I don't believe in that. For me, you say I love you when I becomes insignificant before you. I am not talking about the sacrificing Devis... It's purely when a woman feels secure enough, she doesn't need to look out for herself. There is no I or you, it simply becomes we.

I see it in a labourer couple returning home after their day's work, the husband giving his wife a ride in the pushcart, both chatting away.
I see it in an elderly gentleman I knew who would fret after his own surgery, about how his wife would survive without him...
I see it in a lady I admire, a relative, a peer, who doesn't have a problem sitting down and massaging her husband's feet, because she knows he has had a tough day...

In all of these, I don't find self seeking. Love is such a feeling...you feel loved, the more love you give. And at least in the last two instances, I know the feelings were returned with equal fervour.

Of course, sometimes people end up loving the wrong persons, holding fast to an ideal called love, and end up hurting themselves...I call that stupidity.


@bold brilliant examples from day to day life and I am so happy you said love and not true love.

Soup, I said I do believe there is love, there is no world where there is no love. And there are good people and bad too. But then if there went good, there wont be a quantification of bad too.

I think the problem stems when we juxtapose the love that exists and varies with each generation.

Lemme put an example. Umm a child, young adult. say your son/ daughter, goes to study out of your town/ city/ dwelling or anything and its practically not possible for you to follow him/ her to their place of education. He/ she finds friends and perhaps, a more than acquaintance in the opposite sex. Love blossoms and he/ she finds himself happy in a place, away from you, for the simple reason that there is someone with him. Time passes by and he realises he is in love, the partner, may or may not be, and he/ she begrudgingly has to move on.

Now the idea why I gave you this example is cos you mentioned the juniors and you mentioned that love has changed. But what do you conclude from the above example, that love hasnt changed, and neither the people associated. Its the circumstances that have changed, if you get the drift. Its the definition that has changed, it is more selfish and self seeking, and that has changed.

People in earlier days too loved with all their heart and it was a risk, a gamble cos u never know how the other person is, and even today its the same. There are couples who stick around and find their happily-ever-after, even in the materialistic world of now.

Over the shared cups of coffee, while exchanging notes, the gentle brushing of hands ...is love.
To watch out for that someone special in a hall full of people where you are lonely in a crowd, looking impatiently at your wrist watch...is love.
To wait outside someone's workplace as you impatiently tap your foot on the floor.. is love
To bury your face in the welcoming warmth of an accepting equal after a hard day at work..is love.
To come back home and find an easy camaraderie in the cocooned confines of the four walls as you go about doing the chores, discussing the mundane ...is love.

To out it more explicitly, if we compare a then and now, in marriage or in a live-in, it is love. It has always been and it will always be. No one gets in a relationship for the heck of it or anticipating a heart break.

The only difference is the commitment, which we only realise after judging the partner, one who may stick around with you for a lifetime, or the other, who may run far away from you after the heady sensation of being in love is over. The latter is self seeking, Soup, in no literate words can you justify it. And that was the case then and is the case now, and will continue to be so in times to come.

And the only thing that remains is a broken soul, either nursing a broken heart or picking up pieces of a broken marriage, or a couple who finds home in the hearts of the other.

For some its a lifetime...and for others ..its the end...

But life and love, still go on.. and on.. forever.
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: chicksoup


Anu,

Completely agree on Ila. She didn't annoy me. She was bitchy, because Adhiraj was giving Anami all the attention she herself was seeking.

I loved how the apology ended...I am giving up...This was a bad idea...Goodbye!😆

Kangana- If you come from.a stable family, it is easier to behave well in public. But having an unstable family is not an excuse for bad behaviour.


@bold what is this 😭

KR, stable family? She has always bene weird in public, even on K Jo's chat show.
646714 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
There is hardly any film/TV celeb that I take seriously for their views on social causes..coz all of them are hypocrites somewhere or other..I detest it when they use their "pet causes" in other to get good PR and image building

Words in bold 👏 these celebrities shouldn't be taken seriously because most if not all try to stand out as the real human amongst their clan to grab eyeballs of normal people out there. To an extent these people succeed with a lot of gullible people out there who worship these people and stay tuned to every word these people say but a larger section of people like us won't get impressed with these stuff.

Hypocrisy at it heights when these people give gyaan on stuff and give lectures on things that I'm sure they're not even aware of In the real sense.
646714 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: chicksoup

Twinkle - I think she made a similar controversy last year too. The reply was all little rude, but someone needed to put her in her place too. Anyway, I have never looked up to celebrities. The pseudo feminists seem to love nitpicking on other people's choices, and often forget other people have a thought process too. They are so high on themselves, they don't deserve to know nobler thoughts. Let the frogs live in their wells.😆


On love being self seeking...no way! I know quite a few couple who love their partners unconditionally. Some of it is returned, in most cases partially, in some fully.

Parental love, yes...it is the most secure love.
Loving one's partner...it is a journey. The dynamics change everyday. It is about learning to love, despite the circumstances.
That's why I talked about my juniors...big difference when it comes to the generation before us, where love took risks. Theses days, either people fallbin love with equals or risk is taken for the filmy experience. And then when circumsrances change, it is a use and throw culture.

That is why I value tradition. Watching undinon ki baat, I know why I am like this, and unlike people 10 years younger to me. I consider myself so lucky for the upbringing, friendship, teachers...the integrity is lacking these days.



Chick loved your take on love friendship and above all integrity. Character building is so important for us as humans. Love is not a concept and values are not something to be mocked nor to be ignored as old thinking. Both are good and beneficial to us if we cultivate it and apply it the right way.
Love can be misunderstood by young kids if their perspective is based on the movies and television shows out there. Having a strong family support is so important. Having strong mature unbiased elders around the younger ones instills in them what real love is. Love is not a passing fancy or merely a physical attraction and a need that has to be fulfilled. Physical is very shallow but having emotional connection is so essential. No one has the time to invest into a relationship. Or they're too hurt by something or someone so the whole perspective is so messed up in the head resulting in broken relationships.
Ecrivain thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
http://www.india-forums.com/tellybuzz/buzzin-hot/41786-namik-paul-nikita-dutta-respond-on-making-a-return-to-sony-tv-to.htm

😆

Ok peeps I will be back.c u guys in a bit.

Related Topics

Chat Clubs thumbnail

Posted by: radix ¡ 2 years ago

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".