Nah I think nepotism trumps pretty privilege in the film industry. But pretty privilege in the actual workforce, especially corporate world is most definitely a thing.
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 3rd Dec, 2025
FAMILY TREE 3.12
FAKE FIGHTS 2.12
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 2nd ODI🏏
Yrkkh gen 3 feud - new low 📯
5000 episodes of YRKKH
What made you guys start watching?
Tribute To Legacy
Ranveer Singh Apologises
Dr Kaira Chapter Discussions Thread
Rana Daggubati and Dulquer Salmaan disagrees with Deepika’s demands
Trending everywhere that media has problem with Jai Shri Ram
Should "Megastar" King Khan stop dancing at weddings at 60?
Paparazzi Hit Back At Jaya Bachchan Call For Boycott
Downfall Of Govinda
2nd December episode Discussion thread
My Box Office Predictions for Dhurandhar
The days of friendship and love Season4 SS IshVi RishRee
Nah I think nepotism trumps pretty privilege in the film industry. But pretty privilege in the actual workforce, especially corporate world is most definitely a thing.
not many look good on screen anymore and some talented 90s and 2000s actresses fail to maintain same acting skills…. i have only been impressed with ranis come back so far and madhuris ott comeback .. aish acting has gone worse and same goes for kajolSlightly off topic.I saw this tweet and am wondering if the senior stars who desperately need heroines will consider working with our beautiful, talented heroines..from the 90's and 2000's.They look so much better than the senior male stars.
https://twitter.com/suj_sudharshan/status/1716860323171565696
Nepo kids in the last decade aren't even pretty. They get criticized due to lack of looks, talent, and bare minimum effort. Their work is half-assed.
🤗🤗 Missed you while you were gone too. Don't do that again 

I've noticed at least 3. Theory debunked 
Not again..🤗🤗🤗
Ye lo kaan pakadli ...


I have noticed four..




Shraddha, Katrina, Ash are prime examples....
Male eye-candies tend to have mostly sm following from TV stars to absolutely flop, wooden "actors" like Sid Mal, Ark.
Heck even Fawad who is a decent actor is overhyped to be some god level actor on sm mainly coz of his looks.
The girls (atleast Kat, Ash) have been iconic but the popularity of male eye-candies never really translated on ground level. So while actresses have pretty privilege in terms of offers, guys like these have limited privilege in terms of sm simping imo
.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
Being easy on the eyes is a big part of JOB REQUIREMENTS in Bollywood.
If the JOB REQUIREMENTS is being easy on the eyes, isn't it a form of privilege for those who are born naturally attractive? This is the literal definition of privilege – something that is inherently bestowed upon you.
If it's a requirement, and someone is born without it, doesn't that put them at a disadvantage? Much like how being a star kid is a privilege, and those not born into a film family lack that privilege.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKl3bUPzMRl/?igsh=MTNsM2Q3cmUyOGtqbw==
Nepotism was started in BW by them , claims this video https://youtu.be/24n3sC6j89M
I just came to know that animal is in this list , and I am serious . Who would have thought ? And mark this down Prabhas and Vanga another 100cr...
It seems I have to up my game My jadu tona did not work on jitesh pillai and Aloo kachaloo as she won an undeserved award again. It seems they...
18