Adipurush - Movie Reviews & Box Office - Page 47

oups...that was bad acting from all actors...and even bad directing (a slit throat is neither a clean thing nor would it allow this kind of interaction!)

Even animated Sita in Japanese version had more expressions and emotive eyes compared to stony Sanon.

PS - I can now understand why you dislike Kriti so much.

Originally posted by: Clochette

oups...that was bad acting from all actors...and even bad directing (a slit throat is neither a clean thing nor would it allow this kind of interaction!)

Her PR is behaving shamelessly..lmao, she was shit in the film but PR waale are hyping this third grade performance. She looks masculine & has no acting chops!!

Originally posted by: atominis

Even animated Sita in Japanese version had more expressions and emotive eyes compared to stony Sanon.

PS - I can now understand why you dislike Kriti so much.

🤣 This overacting is just headache inducing. She has one of the strongest PRs in the industry but people seem to forget that. They completely forget about her privileges ( Dinesh Vijan - Sajid Nadiadwala). If she were a nepo, she would have been thrashed like Ananya, Sara, etc.

I've only an impression through the scenes posted in the forum...and there, I agree, it's bad acting (or rather absence of acting) from her side.

But I equally found anybody else's acting poor/underwhelming/disappointing...

Originally posted by: Clochette

Modi isn't a mere pawn or performer, snatch, although I agree that he is also like a poster boy dependent on the decisions of others who profit of Modis own ideology to forward their agendas.

I don't belong to any of the categories you described as I'm apolitical and areligious... both - politics and religion - are menmade (and I mean by men) and powerdriven concepts predominently used not for humanity but against. Initially thought as a positively unifying tool, they quickly got misused because of mostly egoistic reasons (one of those reasons is getting power over others through imposed rules or wealth).

However, my own attitude/thinking doesn't hinder me to inform myself as good as possible about what interests me ...

I think, on a ground level, India still is secular...and it could become a great Indian mouvement if only one would propagate in a positive way the thinking that being a good human being is what counts above any religion. Instead one propagates Hindu, Muslim; Sikh, Brahmin, Dalit etc (religion & caste, something, a person is born into and mostly without a chance even later for a changing decision).

Living in an insecure environment or having an unsatisfactory life even strengthen these segregating perceptions. People who live in decent conditions are less prone to unrest, I think.

Modi, with his charisma, could have initiated a positive change but he himself hates Muslims (certainly from childhood on) and wants an India that doesn't exist (like he may have wanted a family life that did not exist).

Although I don't have watched Adipurush, I get the feeling, that the movie also propagates segregating concepts and has a subtextual political message.

radical islam is a reality and the world is tired of it. modi may or may not be a visionary leader but he happened at the right time. let the muslims understand what it meant to be religious fanatics. let them introspect.

everything else will fall in place.

Why to pick Kriti alone? All were bad. Not bad but worst. The guy playing Hanuman. Throughout the movie mooh pe paani ghusake ghoom raha hai. Saif, well the less said is better. And Prabhas. Never liked him anywhere except Amarendra Bahubali. Lag raha tha larger than life characters suit him but he doesn't have that aura to play Sri Ram. It's complete fault of the director too. In conclusion everything related to this movie is wrong I afraid 😳

The repeated quoting of foreign makers’ Ramayan and the complete ignoring of our own home productions made in south India shows what’s wrong with our Industry and why Om Raut had to look up to the west for getting inspiration for his movie. South India has made some of the finest movies on Ramayan and Mahabharata. There is no south Indian who didn’t grow up watching these stories, thanks to these well made popular movies.

Infact Ramanand Sagar and BRChopra apparently took advice from their South Indian counterparts before and during the making of their classic retelling of Ramayan and Mahabharata. The entire sets of Mahabharata were borrowed from Hyderabad btw.

That's what I thought since so, so long...that the peaceful Muslim should intensively lobby for a peaceful Islam...and should also accuse/call out all the other non-Muslim beneficiairies of a violent Islamism who earn big money by catering to Islamic terrorists and Islamic regimes violating the human rights.

I don't see a really strong peace-favouring Islamic counter-movement to Islamic terrorism and violent outbursts. Even in well-structured communities where incitement and readiness to use violence is easy to detect, I don't notice positively used regulative measures. (of course my knowledge is very gappy).

I think that restrictive political measures (e.g.CAA act 2019) violate the separation of politics and religion and had been rightly criticised... nevertheless I understood the reason as I don't agree either how Muslim leaders themselves mingle religion and politics.

Originally posted by: Alpenliebe

Why to pick Kriti alone? All were bad. Not bad but worst. The guy playing Hanuman. Throughout the movie mooh pe paani ghusake ghoom raha hai. Saif, well the less said is better. And Prabhas. Never liked him anywhere except Amarendra Bahubali. Lag raha tha larger than life characters suit him but he doesn't have that aura to play Sri Ram. It's complete fault of the director too. In conclusion everything related to this movie is wrong I afraid 😳

The music was lauded 😊