Originally posted by: Mahisa_22
But if your decision is creating obstacles for others and preventing a level playing field, then it's wrong. Bollywood is not a privately owned property after all. Launch your own kid, but not at the cost of others.
Bollywood is a sector. If a production company is private, it's fully up to them how they spend the money.
If a star is spending money or using connections with a private company to launch his own kid, he can be said to have taken that role from any of the millions who want to act in movies. There are always going to be losers in that situation. Casting someone in a movie is a zero-sum game. If a star parent is supposed to hold auditions and make sure his beta or bitiya is better than everyone else before spending his own cash on the movie, it's not gonna happen. Humans don't function like that.
This is the thing:
You can acknowledge that nepotism is human nature.
You can also understand that too much nepotism is bad for progress.
You can wait for market/audience reaction to spank the producers into behaving (And you can laud stars who do succeed on their own).
Or you can get govt to regulate how artists are hired by private production houses. Because that's the only other way to force a private citizen to favor an outsider over his own flesh and blood. In which case, you can be almost guaranteed not to have that movie made because no one will want to take the time and effort.
If forced to make movies, they will be propaganda films because government functions like that. Give them power, and they're guaranteed to misuse it.
Anyway, I've said all I had to say on it at this point.
Edited by HearMeRoar - 3 years ago
18