Congratulations PC - Page 12

Why are people believing Daily Mail as the the gospel truth? They make up shit especially when Priyanka or any of Meghan’s friends are involved. They purposely post articles to feed their racist readers. So called “sources” shouldn’t be believed. Whatever the reason, they opted for surrogacy and that’s totally fine, their choice! Lots of people in Bollywood, Hollywood and non-celebrities have babies through surrogacy but the way some people are behaving towards Priyanka and Nick is so weird…

Congratulations to Priyanka and Nick! Hope they don’t see the online discourse by some really shitty people.

OMG....we Indians are the judges of everything.....surrogacy ya natural child birth....sab pehle humse poochho fir karo...😎

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

OMG....we Indians are the judges of everything.....surrogacy ya natural child birth....sab pehle humse poochho fir karo...😎

Actually, now that I think of it, surrogacy is exploitative of female labour. It's an exploitation of a woman's womb. Not criticizing PC, but surrogacy is not something to be encouraged either. 🤔

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Actually, now that I think of it, surrogacy is exploitative of female labour. It's an exploitation of a woman's womb. Not criticizing PC, but surrogacy is not something to be encouraged either. 🤔

??? 😆

Some places don't allow paid surrogacy. And even if they do, surrogates are not forced to do it. Labor is work in exchange for a paycheck. It's a transaction, not exploitation. Any unforced labor is transaction.

People who don't agree should labor for themselves. And yeah... grow their own food, build their own energy source etc. Because when you buy them off another person, it becomes exploitative by their own definition.

All these communist ideas are making a comeback😆. It's like people never learn. Millions dead in Soviet Union from the sheer dumbassery, and some simply refuse to learn.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

??? 😆

Some places don't allow paid surrogacy. And even if they do, surrogates are not forced to do it. Labor is work in exchange for a paycheck. It's a transaction, not exploitation. Any unforced labor is transaction.

People who don't agree should labor for themselves. And yeah... grow their own food, build their own energy source etc. Because when you buy them off another person, it becomes exploitative by their own definition.

All these communist ideas are making a comeback😆. It's like people never learn. Millions dead in Soviet Union from the sheer dumbassery, and some simply refuse to learn.

I think you should gain some knowledge on how dark and seedy the condition of surrogates is in lesser developed countries. The real-time horror stories are sickening to say the least, and paint a picture of how grim and inhumane the surrogate scenario is. I said I wasn't specifically talking about PC.

If you want, I can provide you with some links and you can see (read) for yourself. This has nothing to do with Communism or even Leftist ideology in general. I don't know where you got that from. 🤔

And if you think people 'who grow their own food' i.e. farmers are not exploited, then, well.... Let's leave it at that.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

I think you should gain some knowledge on how dark and seedy the condition of surrogates is in lesser developed countries. The real-time horror stories are sickening to say the least, and paint a picture of how grim and inhumane the surrogate scenario is. I said I wasn't specifically talking about PC.

If you want, I can provide you with some links and you can see (read) for yourself. This has nothing to do with Communism or even Leftist ideology in general. I don't know where you got that from. 🤔

And if you think people 'who grow their own food' i.e. farmers are not exploited, then, well.... Let's leave it at that.

I think its not wrong if women are not being exploited.

The government needs to regularise & find ways to ensure it. They should also put a limit how many times a woman can be a surrogate mother also.

Nothing wrong with a procedure itself, hopefully science will find a way to create an artificial womb itself. Especially for those who can't carry due to medical issues. Also, there is no denying that childbirth does take a toll on a woman's body. Many women die too. I think if they can do it artificially it would be the best.

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

I think its not wrong if women are not being exploited.

The government needs to regularise & find ways to ensure it. They should also put a limit how many times a woman can be a surrogate mother also.

Nothing wrong with a procedure itself, hopefully science will find a way to create an artificial womb itself. Especially for those who can't carry due to medical issues. Also, there is no denying that childbirth does take a toll on a woman's body. Many women die too. I think if they can do it artificially it would be the best.

But it most cases, the exploitation is organised and systemic. That's what makes it so worrying.

I'm not against the concept of surrogacy on paper, but it becomes difficult to support when you know that women who agree to be surrogates do this out of poverty and they suffer a lot of physical and emotional trauma. Thats what makes it such an uncomfortable subject.

My friend shared some stories of women on her timeline where they disclosed stories about being duped by middlemen and how they wouldn't have given up their children if they were allowed to hold their babies. 💔

People are so wrapped up in fighting about PCs choice or whether the surrogate is exploited or not that they are missing the bigger issue here.

IF the news is true that PC and Nick had a baby through surrogacy because they were too busy too concieve naturally then how are they gunna take care of that little baby. I know people are gunna come at me that it's their business how they raise their baby, but c'mon that baby is not a object, it's not a puppy. Why have one if you can't raise one. Why f**k up a child's life like that if you don't even have time to raise it.

I was happy when the news broke, didn't even judge her for her choice.

But this news of why they had the surrogate has left a bad taste. This child is not some vanity item. Karne ne liya kar liya or what.

I just hope this news isn't true really.

Originally posted by: niyati13

Asthma issues coz of all the smoke..inhaled coz of her relatives who smoke, coz of herself based on the couple of her pics we have seen with cig in her hand..and firecrackers on her wedding n elsewhere..

There can be many reasons..we shouldn't judge..her choice

Asthma is not a contraindication for pregnancy..

She can do whatever she want ...then no need to give fake clarification .

Originally posted by: nhrb

Upps.. 😆

I really dislike that these people don't understand the issues faced by people who really suffer from asthma or other allergies.

They use a medical condition just to score some brownie points or gain publicity and then go back to their same harmful habits..don't even make n attempt to hide it..isn't it making a mockery of the very issue they raised?

Whatever...it's their happy moment..hope good sense prevails. And wish the little one brings lot of happiness n calm in their life