Originally posted by: atominis
Yes. Jaya had said 'she's taking it all in, she is quiet, she listens, she stands behind' when she spoke of Ash in KWK. And Amitabh called her 'domesticated' in many TV interviews.
Amitabh was criticised a lot for using that word for Ash back then. It is kind of sexist to call any human 'domesticated'.
The old couple is orthodox in their expectations from women of their family. In Rendezvous interviews too they admitted Jaya was much stricter with Shweta than she was with Abhishek as a mother.
Most film clans are patriarchal. Pataudis, Akhtars, Azmis, Kajol and Rani's parental families etc are few film families that allow their women to work. Others keep their women away from film industry atleast if not any other field. Kapoors, Bachchans, Chopras, Dutts, Khanna etc none allowed women to work in films. Dimple resumed work only after she began to live separately from Rajesh (who admitted he had turned away producers who would come to offer work to his wife). Karishma and Kareena defied their family simply due to their mother Babita living separately and supporting them to work in films.
Yash Chopra had banned women from his family from entering film sets and studios. Had he been alive, I feel it would have been hard for Rani to even do Mardaani or any YRF film after marriage to Aditya considering how strict Yash Chopra was about not allowing family women on sets of films.
The industry is mostly full of such conservative clans or maybe they are not keen on their women doing films because they feel it is 'not a good place for women' or they want their own daughters, sisters, mothers, DILs etc to behave a certain way.
I think once an actor had also admitted he never saw his mom's films as a kid because he could not see his mom with other men in films. This is mindset of most film clans where star sons also do not seem keen on celebrating legacy of their moms as actresses. I cannot recall which star son gave that interview...but it was a couple of years ago.
1