Originally posted by: RegressiveThug
I think our definition of very beautiful is very different.
And if Kajol's acting can stole the show, why isn't the apparently best actress debuting this decade not stealing it? The thing is simple, Parineeti is not a leading actress material because not only she looks average, but also because she is neither a great actor, nor has dominating screen presence nor has a star quality. She is just a filler.
I disagree. I think you seem to have personal issues against her hence your strong dislike against her. I dont find that credible. what so ever.
Have you disliked all her films, and which films has she not been been particularly good in, was it ishaqzaade cause she I dont see how her performance as a lead actress in that film is sub par? Others yes have been terribly underwhelming but I blame that on content not acting per say.
and many actresses are not conventionally beautiful..say alia. and shes lead actress material? I wouldnt look twice at her..neither is she star quality, just forced. so as a comparison factor between them because I would consider both average looking. talent wise/screen presence,I would consider parineeti stronger. on the basis of film content, alia way better. So, how is this conclusion being made when looks are not a main factor for success?
Who do you consider lead actress material then? sara, ananya, jhanvi?
Edited by vsbarry - 5 years ago
18