Hrithik says he was not offered Ram in Ramayan - Page 6

thats true even the director said i didnt offer the film to anyone because they are still writing . he said hrithik and deepika will look perfect i mean its an opinion like us

Originally posted by: MercurialMedusa

I follow my "baap's religion" only toh guess mera religion mere "baap" ka hi hain.

Ramayan is based on Ram being Purushottam viewing that with present day myopic lenses and distorting it is wrong. Masala add karna hain grey shades add karni hain creative and artistic liberty ka naam deke then make a fiction why insist on making Ramayan and distort it?

Dude. Why r u getting worked up. Wat is ur opinion abt Ram asking Sita to do Agnipariksha n later sending a pregnant Sita away just bcoz of a dhobi's remark. Later, asking her to prove her Purity again n she commits suicide. Even Ram commits suicide after it.

This is also fact. Not masala.

Originally posted by: theprince

thats true even the director said i didnt offer the film to anyone because they are still writing . he said hrithik and deepika will look perfect i mean its an opinion like us

It will take lot of time to script this film. Wonder why rumours being spread so early.

Shri Rama didn’t kill Vaali frm d behind ac to Valmiki’s Shri Ramayanam.

Indrajit killed by Laxman’s asthra which doesn’t belong to any asthra shastra.

It’s Shri Rama’s Satyam n Dharma killed Indrajit.

Ppl need to read Valmiki’s one before pointing out anything.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

The entire 'you shouldn't touch religion and mythology' is so LOL worthy. Kyun bhai. I want filmmaker,author,random person to touch every aspect of religion and interpret it in their own way. Religion is untouchable wasn't something Hindus used to say before. Infact,one of the core tenets of Hinduism is that it's so open minded and open ended. You have the choice to interpret everything according to your own thinking.

Yes it's a core tenet of Hinduism that it is open minded. And that's why we have so many adaptations of our mythological epics.

In which other religion do u find adaptations?

Issue is not that Hindu religion should remain tolerant. Question is why r other religions acceptable as intolerant ? Just coz they have always been so?

Nitesh Tiwari said he will stick to the story. It is how he will depict the story that makes the difference.

Originally posted by: MercurialMedusa

Same way no one gets to distort it unless they have some legal standing to do so. Why insist on making a distorted Ramayana unless want to hurt sentiments and enrage people for whom it is a matter of faith?

That's not how trademark works 😆 If something is in the public domain,its everyone's. Religion,mythology havent been trademarked yet thank god(pun intended) for that.

Again,your distortion is their interpretation. Also should some people's faith stop others from putting their opinions out? Should one's faith be deterrent to someone else's interpretation? That's one not-democratic thought process. You can have faith and let others do their own interpretation.

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

Dude. Why r u getting worked up. Wat is ur opinion abt Ram asking Sita to do Agnipariksha n later sending a pregnant Sita away just bcoz of a dhobi's remark. Later, asking her to prove her Purity again n she commits suicide. Even Ram commits suicide after it.

This is also fact. Not masala.

I am not Dude. Who said I am getting worked up? Its you who is getting worked up to defend Hrithik's irresponsible remark.

Ram commits suicide? 😳

Originally posted by: niyati13

Yes it's a core tenet of Hinduism that it is open minded. And that's why we have so many adaptations of our mythological epics.

In which other religion do u find adaptations?

Issue is not that Hindu religion should remain tolerant. Question is why r other religions acceptable as intolerant ? Just coz they have always been so?

Well,those religions are known to be intolerant and they get shit for that. Do you want Hinduism to be treated the same way? I want Hinduism to do better,be better in the current world scenario.We can't go back and be like other religions still stuck in middle ages. If you want Hinduism to be counted as an intolerant religion ( we are quarter way there already) then that's on you.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

That's not how trademark works 😆 If something is in the public domain,its everyone's. Religion,mythology havent been trademarked yet thank god(pun intended) for that.

Again,your distortion is their interpretation. Also should some people's faith stop others from putting their opinions out? Should one's faith be deterrent to someone else's interpretation? That's one not-democratic thought process. You can have faith and let others do their own interpretation.

Where is the question if trademark? U bought it in and u r the one making puns about it.

And why should someone's disbelief meddle and distort my faith? And why should I be ok with it.!