YRF does not take care of their talent - Page 9

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Noted😆

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

reading comprehension is an important tool.
The fact you didn't even what my line meant about being a top actress makes your whole point void.
I didn't said she should have been top in four years.
I said why would anyone take an actress who took a long break, also wasn't a top actress meaning, that no one who is not a successful star is taken immediately in big roles after taking a big break.
My point was never about her not being able to reach top in four years, but well people don't read well nowadays and jump on conclusions reading just the outline.

Originally posted by: MoonOrchid

Well, you can all dissect this further. I need to go.

All I am saying,. the talents that were nurtured fare better than those not nurtured- team of advisors.. of GOOD advisors.. DO matter.

Yeah.. most starsdon;t JUST choose a movie based on script and 'feeling'. They are usually ... guided towards certain scripts by team of .. scouts.

That's how things go.

Pari 's fault is not having such scouts/advisors and taking them roles she did after her debut.

Bash her all you want for her choices- it;s not like I care lol😆

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

You took my golden advice, you are like RK. 😆

Originally posted by: MoonOrchid

He doesn't take his father's advice because he hasa team of professionals reading through scripts and trying to 'intercept' any good roles for their 'master' - how do you think he got some roles? Admittedly.. with Bombay Velvet they ..bombed- as it didn';t suit him

Like Alia and KJo, RK's team tried to fit him in any role they think will bring him success, irrelevant if RK is fit for the role.

RK owns newspapers and fiootball teams, has been super rich from before even starting in BW.. but he doesn't have advisors, 'script chasers' annd reps going through availabvle svcripts? Right.. so he heard abopujt movies like BV .. thought... just gifted gossiping skills??

Sorry but no. Don;t buy it.

RS SAYS he takes Adi's advice- it's years since he stopped. ONCE he did go back to Adi and ..Befikre happened.

Since then, NO ONE really listens to Adi- from the established stars ( I am making comparisons with what i know goes in inside the HW industry when I say this).

Pari should have tried her hand in another industry - if her English is good. Nothing to lose.. maybe gain.

Go somewhere else try her luck see if her talent can break her through in the West.

She IS talented. All she needs is the RIGHT advice. ..and experience in choosinjg good scripts.. and that experience comes with yeaers of reading scripts and choposing with..advisors..

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Yes.. And now I am on the road to success because of you😆 Cuz you gave me advice.. What I did is irrelevant😆

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

are you seriously telling me that Parineeti not getting good roles is apparently not up to her, but her advisors.

If you think people like Ranbir, Bhumi and Ayushmann taking risky roles like (Vicky Donor, DLKH, SMS, WKS, RS, Barfi, TEPK, Badhai Ho, BV, JJ and so on) was all up to the so called advisors, than you're probably not familiar with how people advise in BW.
No one advises a young actor to take project like those, they will rather advise them to take conventional projects.

Originally posted by: sania349

"will anyone cast an actress who never reached the top..."

you are implying that she should have reached the top to me. it came across like that so im not sure if you have the right or the nerve to say that i need reading comprehension tools when in the real world i am totally happy and fine😆

You should realize that your statement can be interpreted in many ways. I am not directly talking to you in person.

anyhow..

and I agree with you that it was hard b/c she never reached the top, so when she came back. but I dont think it is right for people who give her hard time b.c of her mistakes since she is not a privileged actress and does not have good mentorships either (whole point of this thread). and the comparisons with alia..came in. if alia made the same mistakes, she would be supported with good film offers and set backs would not impact her.

so I am not defending her mistakes..but I am saying its unfair to ignore her as an actress with potential which I feel the industry did especially after flopping and this is reflected by her film offers. at the end of the day, how do you know what she is being offered? her choices may have been her main film offers. who knows. and for her to choose films like golmaal..she needs to because that is a big budget film, and is less risky. most actresses who start out be it deepika or priyanka start with big films with big heros..b/c box office success and films that attracts the masses does lead to more popularity and opportunities. kriti is doing housefull 4 for the same reasons, not b/c she wants to be glameorous😆namaste england...brand name. she did the film b/c she thought it would appeal to the masses-wrong choice on her part but there is a reason actresses with less support choose these films initially.

so it is unfair to target her for choosing films like that imo when she is trying to work her way up and create a name for herself like any other actress who is in a competitive atmosphere with uneuqal opportunities.

Originally posted by: sania349

you should know that sonam kapoors bro was offered andahdhun first, and then it was offered to ayushmann. that film has done wonders for him.

its not about parineeti or anyone else not wanting to do good roles, but these opportunties dont come first serve to them necessarily. so it is not up to them!

you have to provide these actors with potential opportunities for them to get good films!

Parineeti is doing a biopic only after shraddha could not do it. shraddha may look like saina but performance wise, parineeti has a higher probability of being able to perform better.

bollywood producers and filmmakes look at the popularity and success rate of an actress/actor before talent which is not a good thing