Hddcs - Page 5

Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais

^^He was most definitely incredible husband
Material & didn't try to change her or bend her to his will. And did all this with a genuineness that is so lacking in today's actors!! Devgn played him
Spot-on! His actions were saintly but he never once played Vanraaj like that because that wouldn't be believable. I don't even like marriage & I almost wanted to shout at her for putting him through all this torture. The only understandable character here was V which was interesting for me because i don't like seeing really nice/saintly characters in films & books, I want to see darkness, sex & black, lol. But it's a testament to Devgn's excellent talent that he made me root for him.

Originally posted by: -Betty-

@Cheesedumblings



How do you know they didn't redo it 😆

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Crying scenes are the worst nightmare for the actors..What is Salman,I have seen the mightiest of the mightiest failing miserably at it...😭😆

Originally posted by: -Betty-

Maybe it's the directors fault then, he should've shot that scene differently, playing to the actor"s strength instead of weakness

Originally posted by: astha36

I think Nandini chose Vanraj because she had made a commitment to him. When she saw how he kept his promise and came to find her love with her, she realised that marriage is about commitment more than love. I think that is what she said too. That's what I have always taken it as. It is about just standing by each other no matter what and that if she didn't stop the marriage itself when she could, then might as well stand by it now. Not everybody follows their heart, some people live by principles. She decided it isn't right to leave one for another and that it just wasn't meant to be.

I don't think Sameer was wrong to leave India for his promise either. For some people, their word or promise matters a lot. They don't take it lightly and it is a matter of honour for them. So that's what it was. If anything, for me that is what made him a worthy opponent to Vanraj. Like someone said here, Vanraj just got those opportunities to show his caring and mature side, his values. Sameer might have done the same or better if given a chance. He wasn't a man child, at least according to me. I think it comes across like that because of his fun demeanour and Ajay seems mature because he was so quiet and brooding. But that's just judging the book by its cover.

Originally posted by: MoonOrchid

I kinda liked and disliked both men for various reasons..each showed love but also how some promises can destroy someone's life. And I didn't care for Vanraj marrying a woman he knew loved another..having intimate relationship and all and still being looked as the better guy..because he helped Nandini finally meet her love...much later.

Aish's role was confusing because if you love someone for so long, against all odds..why then, when given chance, you change tack again?

Maybe it was meant to show that love does NOT conquer all. That maybe marriage is more important..and also staying true to promises.

What it's fascinating is that it almost showed Salman-Aish-Abhishek 's triangle. SLB had some great premonition there.😲 (though I am not saying Aish still loves Salman..just the whole 'leaving ardent love and marrying a guy because he loved her').