Originally posted by: flipfl0p
I will not argue further on this issue.
Naming one's child does not equate to playing with people's sentiments. It might be showing his historical ignorance. Even that is acceptable. I asked in a poll, how many knew Taimur's name (in History) after their school. Fifty percent knew. Fifty percent did not.A culture which is more than 3000 years old must have innate ability to safeguard itself. Such a culture do not need custodians.
the old issue abt the name has been settled.no one has any objection abt the name
in this post at least.what we are voicing against as of now is comparing Ashoka
with taimur in same breadth.saif's arguments that taimur was violent so was
Ashoka so whats the big deal shows how half knowledge kills all logic.
Ashoka was cruel.bt that was his past.after He renounced his violence he has
risen up in humanity.taimur on other hand has never shown any remorse never
repented.he was a beast.n died a beast.hope ur understanding the bone of contention
here.any ways dnt feel offended until we exchange our pov no one will learn anything
new so i wnt call this any argument i would rather say its an exchange of pov.
its ok @flipflop i will eagerly wait to hear from u again.
i dnt mind exchanging pov.if am wrong i will get the chance to correct myself
so why will i nt show interest to learn new things?i hate rigidity of thoughts
that is all.see u soon.
6