its a biggest mystery why jury was so much influenced by rustom or nanavati both in film in actualOriginally posted by: BullsEye777
SPOILER
Alright.. I am confused. Why did the jury declare him 'not guilty'?I mean I didn't see anything for him to get my sympathy. He was not attacked. His wife was not a child to be led astray. The jury doesn't know about the scam and takes Akshay's side only because the dead guy was a flirt? If there was a mention that the jury was filled with his caste/religion, I would have understood.I guess I was expecting something along the lines of the Nanavati case but other than take inspiration from the murder and the 3 key characters' involvement, the story went somewhere else. I wonder when an Indian film maker will have the ability to make a true account in an interesting fashion because the real story is much more gripping.
52