Originally posted by: Zeeliciousxo
Okay then let me say it very clearly: I DO know better. My perspective of the industry is not completely from an outsider. I DO know people within the industry who have been exposed to this type of stuff and have many stories to say about it. So no it's not based on my educated guesses. My educated guesses themselves are based on the stories/people I know. A pattern of behaviour can be distinguished to understand what other patterns will look like. This is science as well. Scientists look at a pattern of behaviour amongst the majority or a set group of people and come to the conclusion that all are a certain way. If you look at it any other way, nothing is ever 110% certain. Even science takes work like this.And exactly, no you did NOT say not hiding equates to flaunting. That is my point. If DP were to engage in such activities, I would think that she would not hide it from RS. That is NOT the same as flaunting. That is just being truthful.Yes cheating is common. But all your paragraph tells me is that you naively believe it is all that simple. You don't think there are any other bumps in the road on the way to success? People don't genuinely fall in love, people don't have partners who wouldn't want them to engage in such activities? But why don't you tell me why you are so focused on DP-RS. What is it that you want to prove?Um ok those phrases may sound condescending to you but no in fact I am genuinely saying all of that.😆I mean it, and I don't mean it in a condescending manner, but in "it actually is what it is" manner.Again, I don't understand the connection between all the assumptions you are making about me with your belief that I am speaking of theories...notice that this is all what YOU think.The point of the last statement is that people these days are so unwilling to believe things even when there is proof of culture/behaviour simply because they hold this theory that all opinions hold the same weight. That's wrong - if it was true, mental patients would have opinions that the world would take seriously. Yes everyone has a right to an opinion it doesn't mean that all opinions are right or that they all hold the same importance/depth. When you have a valid backing for your opinion then it is admissible. Otherwise it is just conjecture.
You would THINK that she would not hide it from Ranveer- I'm saying it's convenient that you think DP would be truthful in this matter!
And here the 'naive' is again! 😆 now aren't you assuming all that from my paragraph? So when I do it, it's assuming and naive! And when you do it - it's an educated guess or judging! Now how are you so sure there is genuine love going around here- it's what you CHOOSE to believe in!
If you had said 'naive' to one person, it could've been genuine! I'm not counting but there must be 5 people in this thread that you used those phrases on, and that's why I say condescending! You say you are an insider to the industry, you are acting as if you know better which is condescending- wouldn't it be more 'naive' if we actually believed what people on IF claimed? I'm not doubting you I'm just stating a point!
Precisely what I'm saying all along- this is all what YOU think! - an theory or educated guess at best! 😆
Again you are generalising a statement! The things which applies to mental patients and sane ones are totally different! My point was you cannot compare them.
When a person with logics/ proofs against him still decides to believe a certain thing, he is delusional, not schizophrenic! All opinions hold the same weight only applies to people in their sound minds, whether or not how wrong their belief is!
Of course all opinions are not right, but who gets to decide what's right or wrong? This is a virtual forum- when you say you are an insider to the industry am I supposed to start agreeing to your statements? I don't even know you! I'm not assuming the 'agreeing to your statement part', I'm just giving an example! Neither do you have a valid backing (educated guesses or supposedly being an insider don't count) , nor do I! So it's all moot.
We will still come down to 'agree to disagree'
46