New KR statement - Page 2

Just a little while ago, Hrithik Roshan himself released a long, official statement on the legal drama between him and Kangana Ranaut. And now, Kangana's lawyer has released a very strongly-worded statement giving their side of the matter.

Here's the statement, unedited and in its entirety:

Mr. Hrithik's statements made to the media are nothing but efforts to gain public sympathy. He cannot wash his hands off the matter now after having criminally threatened my client and having intimidated her, without any provocation. He also cannot deny the fact that my client never named him anywhere and it was he himself who claimed to be "Silly Ex" in his notice. Besides his own acts of stating in the media that he would rather date a Pope' gave enough fodder to the media to start speculating. How can he blame my client for all his own acts of commissions and omissions.

When asked if Hrithik had her dropped as the heroine of Aashiqui 3, Kangana was scathing, "Yes, many lame rumours are doing rounds, even a dumb ass can tell where these rumours are coming from. I don't know why exes do silly things to get your attention. For me that chapter is over and I don't dig graves."

and the ndtv interview.

-----------------------

Further, he should have refrained from making absolutely false statements in his notice. He specifically claimed that he does not know my client socially at all. If that were the truth, then how was he attending my client's private birthday party with his entire family and my client was attending his party besides his sister's and his father's birthday party as well. There is enough proof on public platform, which sufficiently proves that Mr. Hrithik Roshan's is lying.

-----------------------Can it be present tense? HR had social interaction with her in past but no more since...

Pursuant to my counter-notice there are now new claims that my client was not co-operating with the police to help with investigation of Mr. Hrithik's complaint. These claims are as false as his other claims. The fact is that my client was never dealing with any imposter and given the background of the matter, it is very lame on Mr. Hrithik's part to even suggest that. Besides my client was never ever asked for any co-operation in the said matter by any person for obvious reasons. The fact that Mr. Hrithik waited for seven month to lodge a complaint says it all. Now pursuant to receipt of my notice the complaint is once again being looked into by Mr. Hrithik Roshan, only as a face saving strategy.

----------------------------- If there was no imposter then why dont u prove your client was actually talking to Hrithik and not an imposter. Is it hard to prove?

It is also worthy to note that Mr. Hrithik Roshan specifically claims to have received 50 unsolicited emails per day from my client for about 601 days (as calculated from 24th May 2014 upto 16th February 2016). Accordingly he should have received more than 30,000 (thirty thousand) emails from my client as against his own alleged claim of receiving only 1,439 emails from my client during the said period. This shows that there is non application of mind even while making allegations. At least make efforts to do the calculations. Besides if Mr. Hrithik Roshan was really receiving unsolicited emails from my client then why did he not prudently block my client and went on receiving my client's emails for such a long time. The answer is obvious.

------------------------------- figure of speech? same mails being forwarded several times? Its upto Hrithik to block her or not, can you prove that Hrithik also replied to any of those mails? If he didnt then why your client kept on sending those mails?

His own actions speak a lot and I need not say more on behalf of my client Ms. kangana Ranaut. Most importantly I would like to point out that at least Mr. Hrithik Roshan should have bothered to ensure that he has a good reason to send a Legal Notice to my client. However as expected the notice is absolutely baseless, unsubstantiated, unwarranted and uncalled for. There is not even a case of defamation made out against my client and he is issuing a Notice for defamation without application of mind.

----------------------------- Defamation or not, its a notice in private. Next step is considered in reply to yours. If the point is proven, no need to go to court.

He needs to immediately realise that my client Ms. kangana Ranaut does not need Mr. Hrithik Roshan's name to garner publicity or attention, as she is a renowned public figure herself.

I sincerely hope that the matter ends here and better sense prevails.

--------------------------- No she doesnt, thats why she better not talk about silly exes and move on. And spare likes of Deepika and co. too. For her publicity stunts, she is well known.

Originally posted by: -MariaMars-

Y can't Kangana release a statement on her own just like HR? 😕 Y always her friends or someone else is giving news..

Originally posted by: SunHarsh4eva

And please ask kangna to release her birthday pics with HR, even i want to see where was he and his whole family during her birthday party ?

Originally posted by: bips

Keh Ke Peheno @coolfunnytshirt

Hrithik received 1439 emails from Kangana??? He should have ticked off the email notifications option of Candy Crush requests.

Dushyant K. Mahant @DKMahant

An advocate just told news anchor that there are far more pressing issues to discuss than #HrithikKangana Anchor immediately went on a break

Sameer Gupta @mytwit_ID

Breaking news: Kangana was having an affair with Harman Baweja and believed it was Hrithik all this while...

Shreya @MsJajodiya

"Why Is PM Modi Still Silent On Hrithik-Kangana Controversy?" - Rahul Baba

Originally posted by: Staart

Matlab kangana and hr were having an affair aur puri family ko koi problem nahi thi.Bollywood is a really weird place😆