Making a Fool Out of Oneself = Being A Superstar - Page 16

Originally posted by: .krackjack.

Yes. The TM called the supsrstars fools and not the audience. If you go through the thread, except for probably one member nobody really criticized the audience. So accusing this thread of superiroty complex doesn't make sense either.
Also, how do you know they are good movies? If you go by the logic being given here by some.members, anything audience rejects must not be worthy and hence they shouldn't be blamed at all. 😆 I don't personally care about what people think about BW here, but continuously taunting members isn't cool either.

Anyway, I'm outta here. I have said everything I wanted to.

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

When we blame the audience for rejecting a good film, we are essentially judging their taste right? Or the taste of a common man like it has been said on this thread? What is good to us may be trash to them..I personally loved Lootera but i know many who found it very slow & boring..Similarly i hated CE but i know many who found it super entertaining..To each his own..Why judge someone's taste & accuse them of rejecting ' good stuff'? It is all subjective at the end of the day..One's treasure is another person's trash 😆

Originally posted by: blue-ice

Again...that topic was about why the actors do not experiment ...who is to blame...the reply was in the context of the topic...the audience is to blame...if they don't like to watch such movies...but calling out the fans of these two actors and making them look like fools...are u guys really not getting the difference between these two topics??😕

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

Hey honestly its not about comparing that topic with this..I read through that link & just felt that a lot of ppl are in a way blaming the audience for rejecting good cinema..So i just mentioned how what is good cinema to you might be crap to the rest so its a futile exercise to blame the audience..

@ bold- That was my whole point..Who said audience don like actors who experiment or reject different kind of films? These days, they accept any kind of film so long as its entertaining & well made..Otherwise a film like Udaan or Barfi wouldn't have done well..So i just think its an easy cop out to say audience don like good films thats why actors keep doing trash etc..I just don agree with that argument..About the rest, well lets just agree to disagree..Don wanna stretch this issue 😆

Originally posted by: dhartiamber

After effects of Bombay velvet. Everyone who had a soft cornet for Rk here lashing out against superstar system, indian audience, masses, boxoffice, fans, Khans and what not.

Originally posted by: blue-ice

See...we can agree or disagree...that is all fine...I still blame it on the audience and some blamed it on directors/scriptwriters ...but i am not calling them fools...i get it that when a poor autodriver wants to spend his hard earned money he wants to be entertained for those 3 hours so he chooses a HNY/Kick over a Lootera...Its not about even the taste...its about the amount he can spend on movies...so he will choose what will entertain him more...I could afford it ...I can watch both in the theater...not everyone can...and really we all blame anyone and everybody from Lootera flopping to Global warming on this forum...and who cares...but I don't appreciate the audience of HNY being made to look like fools...yes it may be trash to some...but I loved it and I can watch it again...I found it entertaining ...does that make me a fool?