Nonactor vs overactor? - Page 3

Originally posted by: KARAN888

That is not the point 😆

He neither have the star power of Salman/SRK or the acting ability 😛

I will take Salman's Tere Naam over all Hrithiks performances anyday 😉

Yes u can.. its ur choice.

SRK and Salman fans might be always fighting each other but combining those 2 fan bases would be the last thing any1 would want 😆

Salman didn't play himself when he became the Prem of MPK, HAHK, HSSH and the vengeful Arjun of Karan Arjun.

Neither did SRK play himself as the full of life dying Aman in KHNH, conniving Don of Don 2 (not Don 1, he was hamming like hell😆), autistic Rizwan Khan, his character in Dil Se, Koyla, Pardes etc.

Loads of films people can watch where they are neither playing themselves, hamming or not acting.

My second post on your thread, on page 2. Actually nvm. 😆

Star power? Salman was non existant some 6 years ago. Srk has been the most constistant thruout his career since Bazigar. Its not abt star power.

Originally posted by: Deathstroke

SRK and Salman fans might be always fighting each other but combining those 2 fan bases would be the last thing any1 would want 😆

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

You kind of implied that SRK and Salman play themselves in every film, which I countered in my post, with films that prove their don't play themselves in every film. You also implied that you can't watch their films without sleeping or puking, which I've argued against in my post as well. I'm just telling you the movies that prove your statement wrong, in my eyes. 😊

And btw, SRK hasn't starred in 60 movies yet, 5% of which is 3 movies. So again, you're wrong when you say it's not 5% of his total filmography.

If Salman's non-acting bored people to death and SRK's overacting made people leave the cinema, people wouldn't be going to watch their movies one after another. 😆 Kinda obvious much?

Originally posted by: KARAN888

😆