Nonactor vs overactor? - Page 5

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

@ Topic maker,

6? Ermm no, there's more. Way more. I however don't have the time to go recounting all their films to someone that hates them just to prove they have good roles in good films in their filmography.

Anyway I'm out of here, keep living in a bubble that SRK and Salman bore people to death and make em puke. Because it doesn't, if it did SRK and Salman wouldn't be here today.

Where did star power come from? Seriously you're gonna question their star power again. Not again.😆

And I DID mention 'some' movies worth mentioning, for your information. Read my post again.

They obviously have enough star power and acting ability to lure people into the theatres time and again, for more tha n20 years in succession.

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

That was my feelings, I was asking abt urs. If u say nope, everybody is happy with srk n salman.. acting ka swala hi nahi uthta.. to thik hai.

You asked people, if they could watch his movies without sleeping or puking. You never said that you can't watch their films without puking or falling asleep. There's a difference.

Qazplm said in her post a few pages back that your arguments don't make sense, I agree with her.

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

Completely agree with you!😛

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

Star power? Salman was non existant some 6 years ago. Srk has been the most constistant thruout his career since Bazigar. Its not abt star power.

Personal choice.Nonactor can u bore u to death.. and overactor make u leave the cinema.. does it?

2 all time blockbusters to his credit and Salman was non-existent some 6 years back? Yeah sure. Keep living in a bubble.

And btw your 'starpower' question deviates from whatever you wrote in your topic header, make up your mind what you want to ask people first.

I cannot believe people are comparing HR's filmography with the Khans. HR, Ranbir naturally have better filmography because they CAME WAY LATER. At a time when people started to appreciate better films. And if people cannot see HR's annoying acting in films like AMALL, MPKDH, Lakshya, Krishh or even Koi Mil Gaya, where he made autism look like a stupid caricature, then I have nothing to say.

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

6 for salman and six for srk.. u gotta add lot more.

Some1 mentioned HR here.

KNPH, Fiza, MK, K3G, KMG, Lakshya, Krrish Znmgd, Agneepath, Krrish3

thtas what u call a list outta 20 films. Guzarish is not mentioned.. some1 mich say it was flop.

Originally posted by: Star_girl

I cannot believe people are comparing HR's filmography with the Khans. HR, Ranbir naturally have better filmography because they CAME WAY LATER. At a time when people started to appreciate better films. And if people cannot see HR's annoying acting in films like AMALL, MPKDH, Lakshya, Krishh or even Koi Mil Gaya, where he made autism look like a stupid caricature, then I have nothing to say.

In fact, HR was good in the only film you did not mention- Guzarish. JA too. Farhan stole ZNMD right under his nose.