Nonactor vs overactor? - Page 4

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

If Salman's non-acting bored people to death and SRK's overacting made people leave the cinema, people wouldn't be going to watch their movies one after another. 😆 Kinda obvious much?

😆

@ Topic maker,

6? Ermm no, there's more. Way more. I however don't have the time to go recounting all their films to someone that hates them just to prove they have good roles in good films in their filmography.

Anyway I'm out of here, keep living in a bubble that SRK and Salman bore people to death and make em puke. Because it doesn't, if it did SRK and Salman wouldn't be here today.

Salman

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

Thats my POV. If diff for u, say it. But the question is on the title.

I did say it btw. 😆 And I did answer your question, in my first post. Did you read it?

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

If Salman's non-acting bored people to death and SRK's overacting made people leave the cinema, people wouldn't be going to watch their movies one after another. 😆 Kinda obvious much?

^^ Why would anyone say that? Nobody cares about Abhi or Fardeen or Zayed. 😆 Not even for argument's sake.

The whole problem with your topic is that YOU seem to believe that SRK and Salman are overacting and being a non-actor respectively in ALL of their films. Which is obviously not true.

That's why all your counter-arguments don't make sense as well.

Originally posted by: KARAN888

Salman

Mpk

HAHK

Khamooshi

Phir Milenge

HDDCS

SRK

Baazigar

DDLJ

Dilse

Swades

MNIK

CDI

enough said.

Completely agree with you!😛

Originally posted by: Humsafar.

I did say it btw. 😆 And I did answer your question, in my first post. Did you read it?