The issue isn't whether or not Ranbir's a good actor because most people do acknowledge that the guy's at the very least..a good actor. The problem with some people is why does he get ranked amongst the likes of the Khans or Hrithik.
In terms of stardom..yes, Ranbir isn't there yet. The Khans and Hrithik are far, far ahead, but Ranbir's getting there. However, in terms of strictly talent, acting etc..I don't see how the thought of even comparing any of the Khans or Hrithik with Ranbir is blasphemous? because it's not. Ranbir's work in the past 7 years speaks for itself. At this rate, I'd say Ranbir will surpass all the Khans/Hrithik very soon as an actor. In my eyes he already has. Is anyone really going to argue that Ranbir isn't a far better actor than Salman? Comparing his acting abilities to the other 3 may be more opinionated, but even then Ranbir's work in 7 years and with many years ahead of him..it's a fair enough comparison especially considering this guy is perhaps their biggest competition from the younger lot of actors.
In terms of whether or not he's an icon..iconic for what? for being the benchmark of possibly every other young bollywood actor today?perhaps. The likes of Arjun Kapoor and Sid have already said they look up to Ranbir. There must be a reason why they consider Ranbir their supposed benchmark as opposed to the Khans/Hrithik. There's a reason why this guy is pitted against the big guys.
Other than that..Ranbir's personal life is always hyped and I feel many confuse that with Ranbir the actor being hyped..but despite the drama offscreen, I think Ranbir still manages to do a pretty amazing job letting his work do the talking. Hopefully he continues to do that and I'm sure the answer to your question will only become more evident.
18