Sameer - HDDCS

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

noorsand

@noorsand

Voyager

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#41

I remember being disgusted when Nandini chose Vanraaj, but then I realized I would have been upset if she chose Sameer too. What I liked in the movie, no one was shown bad in order to make the other look good--as it occurs in a love stories. Everyone did right--Sameer for leaving when he was told to, Vanraj for taking Nandini to Italy and Nandini for choosing Vanraj.

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: shakti_rock

SRK's character was completely sick...I was still not able to understand...how come Rani leave Abhishek for SRK...

KANK had a very poorly written script...and KJO was more focussed on showing the rich high classiness then on the content ...

I do think KANK had apotential had it written properly...

KANK would have been a great movie...if the ending was different...Movies should not show people getting rewarded for wrong deeds...SRK and Rani getting together in the end was wrong at so many levels...some of the scenes in the movie were so cringe worthy...

KJo...gave no explanation...why Rani would not love and leave an ideal husband like Abhishek and go to someone as obnoxious as Shahrukh,...there was no plausible explanation of that...on the other hand why Shahrukh fell out of love with Preity was understandable...there were a lot of things like frustration, inferiority complex and insecurity in SRK's character which explained it...but AB and Rani...no explanation whatsoever...KANK was a bad movie...a movie with extra marital affairs as the theme...should be providing explanations at every level...while so many things were unexplained in the movie...one of the few of SRK's movies that I strongly dislike..👎🏼

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Dimdim

@Dimdim

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: blue-ice
It was not about choosing Vanraj over sameer, It was about choosing the husband over a lover...This movie was made keeping the Indian mentality in mind...However advance we Indians become...but still saving the marriage comes first...husband is the most important person in life for a wife...so the movie was based on that...Also in an ideal scenario Nandini should have never agreed to marry Vanraj in the first place...There was nothing wrong in Sameer...so Nandini's parents should have agreed to their marriage...but in India ...even today things don't work like that...girls don't have that much say...so this movie was how India works and not about an ideal world...If Nandini had chosen Sameer over her husband...this movie would have flunked and beated black and blue by critics...Just remember that our forum doesn't represent how the real India thinks...

Sad but what you said is so true. Indian mentality it is. At times in arranged marriage one tends to look at family, business, education...everything carries weight. We are programmed to think like that. Our society and upbringing is such to assume a loveless marriage will work and is for keeps...

Edited by Peacefull - 12 years ago

Quote

Dimdim

@Dimdim

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#44

One of the best movies made by SLB ever. Salman, Aishwarya and Ajay created magic on the screen.

Aishwarya matched both the guys. But I preferred her with Ajay...:)

Edited by Peacefull - 12 years ago

Quote

J tiger Barbie

@wat_up

Achiever

+ 7

Action Alliance

Posted: 12 years ago

#45

I have said it many times No she didnt..coz when you in love true love there no holds bar and people dont get outta love that easily..secondly, she should not have married Ajay knowing she in love with another to begin with. lastly, the ending should have changed and she with sameer ok...and i stick to this view..and SLB could have raised the bar had he taken that risk!!

Edited by wat_up - 12 years ago

Quote

Dhee Jattan Di

@DheeJattanDi

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#46

Yess Yess YESSS! I loveddd the movie only because she chose Vanraj at the end. The movie wouldn't have the same effect and same success if she had chosen Sameer. I loved Ajay Devgan's character and his acting and he should have got an award for it 😊

Quote

Meera

@Meera1101

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: wat_up
I have said it many times No she didnt..coz when you in love true love there no holds bar and people dont get outta love that easily..secondly, she should not have married Ajay knowing she in love with another to begin with. lastly, the ending should have changed and she with sameer ok...and i stick to this view..and SLB could have raised the bar had he taken that risk!!

I completely agree jess n that's why I chose not to post my opinion here since, recalling the movie, I always feel bad for Sameer :'( dint like the climax😭 made my eyes wet back then :(

Edited by .MohitKiMeera - 12 years ago

Quote

246851

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#48

she chose vanraaj because thats what was written in the novel duh😆

frankly if we go by novel they would nandini and sameer would meet after 30 yrs, when her children are all married and she has grandkids, also a lot of stuff happened in between, sameer tried to contact her in reality which were ommitted by SLB.

I love the movie since it gave some awesome music and shankar M was amazing in his classical self.

Quote

Dimdim

@Dimdim

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: tannipartner
she chose vanraaj because thats what was written in the novel duh😆

frankly if we go by novel they would nandini and sameer would meet after 30 yrs, when her children are all married and she has grandkids, also a lot of stuff happened in between, sameer tried to contact her in reality which were ommitted by SLB.

I love the movie since it gave some awesome music and shankar M was amazing in his classical self.

Had no idea it was based on a novel. What is the name of the novel? English or Gujarati?

Edited by Peacefull - 12 years ago