Sikh Body Wants Action Against Ajay Devgn

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

frosty

@frosty

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#121

Originally posted by: DejaVu.
LOL, Bollywood doesn't really research things b4 producing movies. Here AD being a Sikh himself,must have some reasoning towards why he has a tattoo.. Either ways , Just because Gulzar and Javed akhtar are lyricist, we have so many Hindu characters singing "Aye khuda...", Which I don't think happens in reality.. 😆😆

Actually gulzar is Sikh. His real name is sampooran singh kalra. Gulzar is his pen name or takhalus

Edited by frosty - 13 years ago

Quote

453365

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#122

Originally posted by: Psycho.Xenorita

Break from real life you mean? Ye it's today! I'm off so been online. Hope I can take more breaks and be online more often like you :( tsk tsk tough life you see.

😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

659945

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#123

Originally posted by: frosty

Actually gulzar is Sikh. His real name is sampooran singh kalra. Gulzar is his pen name or takhalus

Is it. I learn something new everyday on Bollywood forums.😆 So Gulzar is a pseudonym ..

Quote

Wicked

@SomeOldUser

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#124

Originally posted by: DejaVu.

Is it. I learn something new everyday on Bollywood forums.😆 So Gulzar is a pseudonym ..

Yep. His nom de plume. He's been a writer for many of the Indian movies from the 60s and 70s decades.

Quote

souro

@souro

Alumni

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#125

@guess_who: Please don't ridicule others about their language skills. This forum is open for all, please respect that.
Also if you have a problem with what someone might have written, please point that out without name calling.

@Attractive: Racially/ religiously prejudiced jokes are not allowed on IF. I understand that you did it without knowing. But once you've realised, please move on instead of continuing the argument, especially making unfounded accusations of MIDs was uncalled for.

@Xaffron: It's better to report something and leave it at that. Stating it in the open forum can escalate the matter, so my request is to please avoid that.
Moreover, dragging another member's name who is not at all related in the current discussion, was not necessary.

Quote

Wicked

@SomeOldUser

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#126

Originally posted by: souro
@guess_who: Please don't ridicule others about their language skills. This forum is open for all, please respect that.
Also if you have a problem with what someone might have written, please point that out without name calling.

@Attractive: Racially/ religiously prejudiced jokes are not allowed on IF. I understand that you did it without knowing. But once you've realised, please move on instead of continuing the argument, especially making unfounded accusations of MIDs was uncalled for.

@Xaffron: It's better to report something and leave it at that. Stating it in the open forum can escalate the matter, so my request is to please avoid that.
Moreover, dragging another member's name who is not at all related in the current discussion, was not necessary.

😕

Whose name?

Hopefully you do something about the constant name-calling and belittling on the forum. That's all I am hoping/expecting out of you. Rest, the lesser said the better. It's a free world. It would be better if name-calling wouldn't be entertained, though. Thank you for your support.

Edited by -Xaffron- - 13 years ago

Quote

453365

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#127

If only someone could answer my two simple questions and enlighten me

1) Who else converted to Sikhism, other than Hindus?

2) The elder son was made a Sikh by 1000's of Hindu families. In history, thats unprecedented. Such a drastic step would not have been taken if the Hindus did not consider Sikh's to be part of them.

Lastly, Sikhism abolished some shameful Hindu practices like Sati, superstition and the cast system which was way ahead of its time but like .Heisenberg said there have been mystics and scholars before the Guru's who called these very same Hindu rituals out.

Quote

Dhee Jattan Di

@DheeJattanDi

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#128

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

Actually they do. My parents are Hindu but they did not have saath pheres in their wedding. It was less than that, I think three. Hinduism differs depending upon the practicing culture/locations etc. North Indian Hindu customs may differ from South Indian, so on and so forth.

I am hearing this for the first time because what I have read is the 7 phere are the same in South as well as the North, other customs and traditions might differ. But okay let's leave that aside, the vows we take in Sikhism are completely different from the promises the Hindus make while marrying. And there are so many other differences between these two religions, like we do not believe in mukti. But yes it's okay if people think Sikhs are not different.. because it doesn't matter how much we try to explain some people will believe what they want to believe. So yes let's leave it at that. I am happy atleast the followers of these two religions can live peacefully in one country, not only of these two.. followers of any religion live peacefully together in India.