DID BEBO surpass the 90's ACTRESSES?!!!!!

Page

532095

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

I made a topic a while back on if BEBO surpassed RANI, PREITY, AISH. Most people agreed that she did. Now, I want to ask if she did indeed surpass the 90's actresses. I am not talking about Madhuri, Juhi, Kajol. 😆 I am talking about the other actresses like Urmila, Karishma, Manisha, Raveena, Sonali, Pooja, even Mamta. 🤣 It is clear BEBO has beaten her sister. BEBO has had more films and roles to prove her talent. BEBO is now being criticized for copying Urmila? 😕 Not to discredit Urmila and her contribution to Hindi films, but her filmography has been lacklustre. She only had a few good roles like Rangeela, Satya, Bhoot, etc. But, most of her success came from one director RGV. Manisha also had a lot of flops and had a few hits and there. Raveena, her career was mainly looking good. She didn't have good performances until the early 2000's. And Sonali, Pooja, and Mamta don't even factor into the equation. But, I wanted to mention them anyway. 😛 Did BEBO surpass the 90's ACTRESSES?! Please share your thoughts...😉

Quote

Frequent Posters

453365

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

NO

Madhuri and Kajol are in a whole different league.

Karishma and Juhi have had much more success than Kareena.

Urmila and Manisha are twice the actress that Kareena is.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

740920

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

Yes her dialoguebaazi, & haughtiness surpassed the heroines of all decade. 😃

Quote

532095

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: bambogli
Yes her dialoguebaazi, & haughtiness surpassed the heroines of all decade. 😃

🤣 😉 BEBO is indeed an icon.

Quote

BIackSwan

@BIackSwan

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: guess_wh0
NO

Madhuri and Kajol are in a whole different league.

Karishma and Juhi have had much more success than Kareena.

Urmila and Manisha are twice the actress that Kareena is.

Completely agree with you. I can't even imagine Kareena or anybody else repeating a performance like Bombay. It's unfair to compare the current set of actresses with the 90's generation or any past generations for that matter

Quote

Koiza

@-koiza-

Sparkler

Posted: 13 years ago

kareena is jack of all trades master of none!

90's actresses precisely had one strong factor in them which made them in a league of their own

kajol: acting

juhi: comic timing

madhuri: dance

and others like this. Madhuri and sri devi were more of having the entire package (exceptional)

nonetheless they were known for their specific quality. If manisha didnt know how to dance, she never tried it over and over again, remained focused on her acting in some great performances.

With kareena, the problem lies in that she wants to do it all, be it item numbers despite not being a good dancer and everything, Variation is good but then again it makes her lose that one thing these 90's actresses were known for.

Quote

Nkapoor3

@Nkapoor3

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

Kareena has not beat Karisma, karisma has seen more commercial and critical success!

Quote

-FSH-

@-FSH-

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

Kareena did not even surpass Rani.Kareena might be successful , but her acting is no where near to Sridevi ,Karishma , Kajol or Madhuri.She is a good actress, but the grace, dignity and face expressions that these actresses in the 90s had are hard to find.

But I like Kareena also to some extend

Quote

TheRager

@TheRager

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: guess_wh0
NO

Madhuri and Kajol are in a whole different league.

Karishma and Juhi have had much more success than Kareena.

Urmila and Manisha are twice the actress that Kareena is.

Couldnt like so quoting and agreeing.