Katrina Kaif, can she take it to the next level? - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

63

Views

5.7k

Users

29

Likes

146

Frequent Posters

Nuktaacheen thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades


Anyway, a role can be both commercial and substantial. Her roles in New York and Namaste London are good examples. One doesn't have to play serious characters or work in pretentious artsy flicks to prove oneself.

but that's my point... does she really need to prove herself as a great actress to be in bollywood...!!
the answer, quite frankly, is no...!!
in the past too, there are many actresses and actors, who had a good career span without getting any award... and they were all good actors/actresses... so really, as long as remains in her own comfort zone, and does well with it, it's okay...!
Akshay is a decent actor, and he has done well in different genres... but he still sticks to comedies mostly... reason is because they work at the box office (majority of the times)... he did Tasveer 8x10 and he was actually quite good in that movie... still it did not do well... so i can imagine why he would not take too many chances like that with performance oriented movies...!!
i feel that it's the same case with Kat... she sticks to what she thinks will do well at the box office... and frankly, i don't see anything wrong with her strategy...
now, there are other actors and actresses, who think g r o w t h is also important, and they dabble with different roles... and that's also good for them, in the long run...
so really, everyone does what they think will be beneficial for their careers...!! 😃
p.s. thank you... for editing out that comment...!! 😃
Edited by Nuktaacheen - 14 years ago
.khoobsurat. thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: chatpati900

Well, it's taken her about 7 years to improve to this level so i don't know if I'd be getting hyper about her taking things to the next level just yet. Katrina has a very very very long way to go as an actress and while she is improving, her groW*H has been pretty slow. While, she might be capable of doing a small (read miniscule) bit in Rajneeti, I honestly don't think she can carry a film like Jab we Met or Fashion on her shoulders at this point. Yes, she did a Namastey London but that did not really require much acting since she was literally playing herself in the movie.


So, the bottom line is, if people want to wait around for another few years, I'm sure they'll see her doing something better than what she's doing now.



what do you mean by she is playing herself in Namastey London? Other than I agree, she had nothing to do in the film!
Edited by lensahunte08 - 14 years ago
ISano thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#43
that role was nothing special honestly
anyone could have done that role..
there are so many girls out there.. who could do it easily..
chatpati900 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: lensahunte08



what do you mean by she is playing herself in Namastey London? Other than I agree, she had nothing to do in the film!


I meant that she was playing a character that was very close to what she is in real life: an Indian girl brought up in England and thus knows very little about Indian culture yada yada yada.
518108 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#45
^^ Katrina was brought up in England but her accent is rather odd. I hardly find it British. At first I thought it was because of the environment that she is in, and is losing her accent for that reason. But it seems like she has always had that odd accent. 😕 Don't mean to go off topic...just a general query.
31609 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades



A minor analogy on Ash and Kat's acting: Ash, though not a great actress, still did films where she was required to act. From the very beginning of her career, Ash stuck to films that gave her scopes to act and prove herself. Ash did not use her beauty (even though many producers used Ash only for that purpose) to make a name for herself. Despite of having the looks, Ash performed in films where her role was more than just being a showpiece.

Since you brought in Priyanka, I will give you that Priyanka acted terribly in the films you mentioned. She hammed her way through them, yes, but the fact that many of those films gave Priyanka substantial roles can't be denied either. Same goes for Kat's contemporaries: Sonam's roles in Saawariya and D6 had far more meat than anything Kat had done so far. And it is for this reason that, actresses like Priyanka, Kareena, Rani, etc improved their prowess with each new films: they took risk and tried to do films with substantial roles. Based on that, I see Sonam going a long way ahead (at least when compared with someone like Kat). Same goes for Deepika; her roles aren't necessarily the greatest, but they are way better than Kat's half-baked ones.

Katrina, on the other hand, has yet to do a single movie (with the possible exception of New York) where she is required to act. In Raajneeti, all she was required to do was to wave her hands and be an arm-candy. Kat's roles usually consist of looking pretty and smiling her head off and dancing. She had barely went out of her comfort zone and tried her hands at films which rests solely on her shoulder, and which gives her the chance to show her acting prowess (if she has any, that is). And this is why I really don't see Kat going far when it comes to the acting department. Until and unless she starts doing meaty roles (like Kareena in Chameli, Rani in Saathiya, Priyanka in Aitraaz/Fashion, etc, i.e. roles that helped them prove themselves), she will remain the mediocre actress that she is.

Sorry, didn't mean to write an essay. 😆


im sorry but i dunt agree. Kat (these days) is doing films which have roles just as substantial as those of the actors u mentioned. i.e PC and sonam. PC was nothing but arm candy in LS2050, KKrish, bluffmaster, MDK. With Kat, yes she did do arm candy movies...but she also did movies like namaste london and new york where she had something substantial to play....furthermore, acc to me she was far from being just an eye candy in rajneeti...im not saying she was gr8 in the film...but her role was definitely something critical to the plot. Even in ajab prem, she tried to explore some comic timing although it also falls under the category of her "looking pretty nothing else" movies.

And her future films, ZMND and tees maar khan also look like they are going to work...im sure she has a strong role in ZMND, judging from the fact that zoya's directing the movie...and tees maar khan is i guess, well another arm candy role...but would be interesting to see her subtly "ham" in a farah khan movie.

but point kat is tring to balance it out these days...by doing hard-core commercial stuff and also stuff which can hone her craft. She went from doing sarkar and apne where she had a two minute appearance...to singh is king and welcome where she hogged footage...they she went from there to new york and rajneeti where she got to show her acting prowess. Shes only improving and at this rate....an award dosen't seem too far away for her.
mademoiselle1 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#47
I never get it when people only attribue Katrina's supposed sex appeal or her looks for her success, as if people only watch her movies for her looks but they watch the movies of Priyanka, Kareena and Aishwarya for their "acting"... please... if people were watching actresses for their acting they would be watching Vidya balan, Tabu, Koko... and Priyanka, Kareena and Aishwarya wouldn't be ruling the roost right now. So if you want to say that people only oogle over Katrina's look, then i would say its the same for the case of mediocre and below mediocre actresses like Pri, Kareena and Aishwarya... yes these three have displayed some so called acting ability in one or two movies after many missed chances and hamming their way out of many movies but these three are far from perfect either. I would say people only drool over Aishwarya's, Kareena's and Priyanka's looks when they watch their movies over the likes of Vidya, Koko and Tabu and many others.
Edited by mademoiselle1 - 14 years ago
sakura_ thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#48
Not just Kat but her contemporaries as well. I dont see any of the current actresses worth even calling an actor :| (with an exception of Kareena- but she's OTT at times, Vidya and MAYBE Priyanka- again very over rated). It's a shame that actresses are merely eye candies in a mainstream Bollywood movie(giving more importance to looks than acting). It's a shame that these young guns (so called Happening stars) can't even come close to match the caliber of yesteryear TOP actresses. You dont even have to go far- Madhuri, Sridevi, Juhi for instance.

As for KK- she has done 20+ movies now? But her acting hasnt improved still. Maybe a little but 20 some movies is a lot of space and time to learn to even emote (forget about language problem- i'll give her that).
ISano thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#49
but still. kat cant to a villager girl role or lets say geet kinda role..
it wont suit her.. not even the pronouncesation woudl be the same.. if she do villager/dhiyatan
geet fulto panjabi style
coz i believe geet no one could do it.. kareena was the best being a priyanka fan im not sure if she could do it..
Nuktaacheen thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: mademoiselle1

I never get it when people only attribue Katrina's supposed sex appeal or her looks for her success, as if people only watch her movies for her looks but they watch the movies of Priyanka, Kareena and Aishwarya for their "acting"... please... if people were watching actresses for their acting they would be watching Vidya balan, Tabu, Koko... and Priyanka, Kareena and Aishwarya wouldn't be ruling the roost right now. So if you want to say that people only oogle over Katrina's look, then i would say its the same for the case of mediocre and below mediocre actresses like Pri, Kareena and Aishwarya... yes these three have displayed some so called acting ability in one or two movies after many missed chances and hamming their way out of many movies but these three are far from perfect either. I would say people only drool over Aishwarya's, Kareena's and Priyanka's looks when they watch their movies over the likes of Vidya, Koko and Tabu and many others.

actually, that's a good point... and you're right to most extent... to be honest, i think looks do play a much more important part with success... not only with the actresses, but even with the actors as well...!!
but i really don't agree that priyanka, kareena, and ash are mediocre actresses.. they are good actresses, and have proven it many times in many movies... some may not agree (as they can't connect to them), but everyone has a different perception... i never found tabu to be a good actress, except in some of her movies... there are certain type of roles she does well, and others, i just can't connect with her... so it all boils down to what connects with you... yes, vidya is an awesome actress...!! she'd be my favourite, but i have taken a sabbatical of acquiring favourites after madhuri...! 😆😆

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 2 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/vash-level-2-review-a-rare-sequel-that-unsettles-in-the-best-way-and-lingers-long-after_226452...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 2 months ago

https://youtu.be/oD9cf4b7Sbk

https://youtu.be/oD9cf4b7Sbk
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 4 months ago

https://x.com/PanoramaMovies/status/1930244746326290859

https://x.com/PanoramaMovies/status/1930244746326290859
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 1 months ago

https://x.com/SAMTHEBESTEST_/status/1970387035270848693 https://x.com/SAMTHEBESTEST_/status/1967503131845275812

https://x.com/SAMTHEBESTEST_/status/1970387035270848693
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong · 22 days ago

Everyone is saying Katrina is a trendsetter having a baby at age 42 and getting married at age 38. What is so special? It is not like she has...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".