RAAVAN Movie Review (All Members+Critics Reviews) - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

157

Views

32.5k

Users

52

Likes

207

Frequent Posters

poppy2009 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#41
Much as Raavan is being trashed in Hindi, its being lauded in Tamil, not just by the masses (The film has seen one of the biggest openings in recent times) but also by the critics! Here is one review of the Tamil version with Vikram in the lead;
First things first. 'Raavanan' is not what everyone thought so. It isn't a contemporary adaptation of Ramayana. Instead, it's the Valmiki's epic meeting Shakespeare's Othello. The master filmmaker Mani Ratnam has apparently taken inspiration from these greatest works to narrate a gripping story in his own inimitable style.

'Raavanan', right from the day it went to floors, has been rising a huge hype and hoopla. And expectations soared a never before high before its release. Does the end product lived up to all? To this question, the answer is- With a huge star cast chipping in with their best, mesmerising shots, crisp editing and riveting music, 'Raavanan' ends up satisfying the appetite of the masses.

All credits to Mani for rendering a movie that is engrossing and entertaining from the very word go. With Vikram around, his job seems to have simplified. The duo end up giving sheen and shine to every scene, which unfolds at good pace. With the best of best in the business like A R Rahman (music) and Santosh Sivan (cinematography) joining hands with Mani, the battle seems to have been won even before it began.

If Mani can be considered the captain of the team, it's Vikram who helps make all his dream a reality. As Veera, he comes out with one of his finest performances. He is not just ruthless, but at times emotional, sentimental and humourous. Veera is an epitome of emotions, which Vikram has brought out well.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan is not far behind. She catches up with Vikram frame-to-fame. As a bewildered Ragini, who is kidnapped by a mighty man, she brings out the right emotions. Worked hard for her role, running in jungles, sliding from cliff. Prithviraj as Superintendent of Police looks stylish and apt for role.

The storyline is nothing new to Tamil cinema. It is basically a revenge drama. But what is entertaining is the way Mani has made the script and screenplay. Man of many accomplishments, he has ensured that it has class and mass elements in them.

The movie begins with Veera (Vikram), a dreaded don and his men fighting cops and taking away Ragini (Aishjwarya Rai). Ragini's hubby Dev (Prithviraj) is Superintendent of Police in Thirunelveli district who is already behind Veera who has over 60 cases pending against him. But he is ala Robinhood in the forest for his kind heart.

The cat and mouse begins between them. Dev is joined by a DSP (John Vijay) and they enter the forest. They get the help of a former forest guard Gnanaprakasam (Karthik), who knows the nook and corner of the jungle.

Meanwhile, Veera keeps shifting Ragini from one place to another with his elder brother Singam (Prabhu) and younger sibling Sakkarai (Munna) helping him. Veera is also helped by the villagers in every act of his. Ragini even attempts to end her life, but Veera saves her. In the meantime, Veera and his brothers manage to catch hold of the DSP and physically harass and torture him.

Angered at their act, Ragini pours angry words. When she questions as to why he has kidnapped her and is abusing a cop, an agitated Veera narrates the reason for all his acts. In a flashback, it is revealed that the death of his sister Vennila (Priyamani) had provoked him to do so.

Vennila along with her brothers lead a happy life until her marriage is fixed. On the day of her wedding, Dev and his men enter the wedding hall and attempts to bump off Veera, who along with his brothers flee from the place hoping that Vennila would be protected by her husband. However fearing life, the bridegroom runs away leaving her. Her modesty is outraged and she is forced to end her life. Brothers then vow to avenge Dev.

Now cut to present, Ragini starts to sympathise Veera. The hot chase by cops for Veera continues until Gnanaprakasam prefers to come all alone and broker peace with Veera. In return, Sakkarai goes to meet Dev and agrees to end everything. But he is killed.

Now it is all up to an angered Veera to go hammer and tongs and teach a lesson to cops. At one point of time, Veera allows Ragini to go with her husband. But Dev makes sure Ragini meets Veera once again. What is his motive and what happened to Veera is the climax.

It has been a gripping narration from the very first frame. After 'Sethu' and 'Pithamagan', another side of Vikram's acting credentials is exposed. As Veera, he is at free touching almost every aspect of acting.

Aishwarya is pretty and comes out with her best. Prithviraj and Priyamani have taken the challenge of being part of a Mani Ratnam's film and delivered their best. John Vijay walks away doing a negative role.

Karthik as forest guard fits the role to T. His expression and body language are something interesting. Equally attracting is Prabhu. Munna as Vikram's younger sibling gets a meaty role to play, which he utilises well.

The shots especially in the huge jungle, water falls, hot chase and stunts have been canned at their best. The tone and texture is amazing. All credits go to Santosh Sivan. Rahman's music is the highlight and it gets more sheen with the way it has been shot. 'Veera Veera...' and 'Usure Pogudhey...' still chime in our hearts even as we walk out of theatres.

Running for little more than two hours, 'Raavanan' will go down in the history of Tamil cinema as one of the finest and best. Cheers Madras Talkies and Mani Ratnam for rendering a class movie that is racy and entertaining too.
104869 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#42
Here is another review of the tamil version-
Raavanan review: Not among Mani's best
Movie
Raavanan
Director
Mani Ratnam
Producer
Madras Talkies &Big Pictures
Music
A R Rahman
Cast
Vikram, Aishwarya Rai, Pritviraj, Prabhu, Karthik, Priya Mani
By Moviebuzz
Mani Ratnam's latest Raavanan is nowhere in the league of his previous 80s and 90s Tamil classics. The trouble is that the master craftsman, whose films used to work due to its offbeat storyline and unique presentation, has changed his focus to Hindi cinema. In the process he has lost touch with his roots and ends up making a film which does not have strong Tamil nativity or flavour. But having said that, Raavanan is good in parts, an off-kilter cinematic experience. It is technically the finest movie made in recent times, superb camerawork of Santosh Sivan and Manikandan, never seen before stunning locales (in India) and crisp editing. The major plus is the actors – Vikram, Aishwarya Rai, Prithviraj, Prabhu and Karthik are very good and keep us engrossed, but the story and screenplay by Mani Ratnam and Suhasini are a big let down. The story is wafer thin and Mani has based it pretty much on Ramayan, with a cop, and the Robin Hood story set in a forest with some twists and subplots. Veera (Vikram), a Robin Hood-like guy also known as Raavanan, and his elder brother Singam (Prabhu) live in a tribal village somewhere near Ambasamudram in Tiruneveli. They mete out instant justice and run Kattapanchayat, but are loved, respected and feared by the locals. Dev (Prithviraj), the Ram character is the Superintendent of Police. He is on the hunt with other cops and a forest guard (Karthik), a new age Hanuman, for Raavanan, who has taken his wife Ragini (Aishwarya Rai,) the modern day Sita, as hostage. Veera has a personal score to settle with Dev and the cops whom he believe is responsible for his sister Vennila's (Priyamani) custodial rape and subsequent suicide. Meanwhile, Ragini, who initially abhors Veera and thinks he is a brutal beast, later discovers that her 'God like' husband is no saint and has dark shades in his character, too. All this leads to a riveting climax on the cliffs. The highlight of the film, as mentioned earlier, is the technical wizardry. Mani's choice of lush locales fits in with the realistic sets and props erected by art director Samir Chanda, and captures the ethos and milieu effectively. Water is the main motif throughout the film - the waterfall, the characters having long conversations as it rains continuously, the song and celebrations in rain. You can feel and touch the greenery, the moss in the forest as Santosh Sivan's camerawork is pure magic and his use of natural lighting gives the film that raw, colourful, serene look. The climax fight between Vikram and Prithviraj on the bridge is extraordinary, with picture perfect top angle shots and camera movements. However, AR Rahman's music and Mani's song picturisation and placement, for which he is famous, is pretty ordinary. Songs act as a speed breaker and is not needed, but has been thrust in for commercial reasons. In fact, during post interval, two songs come back-to-back within a span of five minutes. The particular song has been introduced to show Veera's love for his sister, Thangachipasam Mani style! Vikram as Veera towers above all. He brings a primal mixture of beauty, affection and savagery to the character. You can feel the earnestness of his intentions and the wetness of his tears, especially in the climax. He adds the little touches that make all the difference to his character and you can't take your eyes off him. Armed with the film's best-written role, Aishwarya Rai has made a sensational comeback as Ragini, whose fear and hatred for Veera gives way to a sneaking admiration for her captor. She is mesmeric and has come out with an award-winning performance. Prithviraj is the ideal foil for Vikram, and is good, especially in the final subtle showdown with Aishwarya. Priyamani does her best in her cameo appearance, while Prabhu and Karthik are hilarious and make a mark. The film lacks the Mani Ratnam touch in the story and screenplay department, and has a wobbly first half, where the story just does not move. The last 10 minutes are the best part of this 2 hours 7 minutes film. Mani Ratnam is better off doing straight Tamil ventures than making such hybrid variety films that fall between two stools. Raavanan will never feature among Mani Ratnam 10 best films. Nonetheless, it is not to be missed.

Verdict: Above Average

104869 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#43
Reviews are not at all positive, however I will still watch it.
I think whenever ManiRathnam has attempted to direct Hindi movies, they have been a big let down- Yuva, Guru and now this one.
Whereas his tamil versions have always been better.
poppy2009 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: pragya0

Reviews are not at all positive, however I will still watch it.

I think whenever ManiRathnam has attempted to direct Hindi movies, they have been a big let down- Yuva, Guru and now this one.
Whereas his tamil versions have always been better.

Mani's sensibilities are very Tamil in nature and when he attempts a Hindi film, somehow his innate genius gets diluted! Besides, a large canvas has never been Mani's forte...smaller, intimate films like Mouna Raagam, Alai Payauthe, Agni Nakashtram, Anjali have brought out the best in him!
Dil Se, Yuva and Guru were all very average movies! I could barely sit through Yuva!
I am also looking forward to watching the Tamil version! Somehow, Abhishek put me off by the promo's itself! Too much scowling and facial expressions! 😕
rhea_6 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#45
Saw the film FDFS. Dissapointed mainly coz it's a Mani film so the expectations were very high.
Agree,that Mani's work in Tamil are his best. Not liked any of his hindi films.
pooja_l thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#46
here is one review: This one toh say, Ash and Vikram are gonna get national award from this film:

Ten reasons to watch Raavanan!



By galatta
Thursday Jun 17 6:05 PM

1. For Mani Ratnam fans, this one is reason enough, but for you sceptics out there, here are nine more!

2. If you thought Iruvar, Roja and Bombay were Mani Ratnam's best, Raavan/ Raavanan is going to stun you! Says who? Just about everybody who has worked for the project! "Mani Ratnam has made this film like a penance. Mani Ratnam, Vikram and Aishwarya Rai will definitely get National Awards," said lyricist Vairamuthu.

3. Mani Ratnam's Raavanan is also special for its huge star cast: Vikram, Aishwarya Rai, Prithviraj, Karthik, Prabhu, Priyamani, Munna, John Vijay in Tamil and Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai, Vikram, Govinda, Ravikissen, Priyamani, Nikhil Dwivedi in Hindi (Raavan).

4. Most parts of the movie were shot in deep interiors of dense forests. Our hero plays a tribal chief!

5. Shyam Kaushal has choreographed the thrilling climax fight. "The shooting for Raavan began in January 2009 in Kolkata, then Ooty, and the climax was shot on Malsej Ghat, where there's a scene on bridges 2,000 feet above mountains. Mani loves challenges and likes challenging his actors and technicians too. His quest for perfection puts them through a grueling routine," he said.

6. For the first time, Vikram simultaneously plays two diametrically different roles in two languages of the same film. Vikram play the role of Dev (Ram) in Hindi and Beera (Raavan) in Tamil.

7. Aishwarya plays the role of Ragini, a spunky classical dance teacher. The first look of the movie shows her dancing gracefully in a song.

8. Interestingly, Aishwarya Rai will dub in her own voice for the Tamil version while Vikram is all set to speak Hindi in Raavan.

9. Another highlight is Prabhu and Karthi, co-stars in the blockbuster Mani Ratnam movie Agni Natchathiram, they team up again for the same director after a long gap.

10. A.R. Rahman's chart-busters, Vairamuthu's adorable lyrics, Santhosh Sivan's marvellous camera work and to top of all, 'The Mani Ratnam factor'. Well Raavanan is definitely one of the most-anticipated films of the year. So get ready for some action this Friday (June 18, 2010).


source: http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/91275/Ten-reasons-watch-Raavanan.html


-Mmmmm- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#47
Any day Vikram is a much more seasoned and intense actor than AB. I always had this feeling that Vikram could carry the title role better thab AB. Even in the promos AB was not looking convincing enough in the title role. All he was doing was weird facial expressions and making a bufoonery out of it.
I am sure the Tamil one will work better than the Hindi one.
-Mmmmm- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#48
Raavan Opens To A Poor Response In Early Shows

Friday 18th June 2010 15.30 IST

Boxofficeindia.Com Trade Network

Raavan had a poor start today in its morning and early afternoon shows. The all India opening average was around 40-50% with some multiplexes in Mumbai, Pune and South showing 60-70% collections but on the other hand there was Gujarat, UP, and Rajasthan with collections in the 30% range.

The film still has chances to show improvement especially at multiplexes in the evening and night shows but overall it looks like day one will be below expectations. The film has managed to get a heavy release at some prime multiplexes with 24-26 shows so that could help overall collections a little bit especially if it was to pick up today and over the weekend.

poppy2009 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#49

http://www.livemint.com/2010/06/18125255/Raavan--The-demon8217s-doo.html

From the very first scene, Raavan is a visual whirl. In hippy language, trippy. In one of the earliest sequences of the film, Raagini (Aishwarya Rai Bachchan) is on a boat alone in the middle of a ferocious river, when an eagle swoops down on her boat. She looks at it, the bird looks at her. And then she looks up, where her predator Beera (Abhishek Bachchan) is menacingly staring at her. Thick, misty air; howling waterfalls; barren trees; pouring rain; gigantic, ancient Vishnu statues surrounded by deep green trees—the forests where the film is shot make for our own natural Na'vi land. The film is a visual paean to Laalmaati, the fictional place, where nature is beautiful and inscrutable.

Also See Lounge talks to Mani Ratnam

But the technical inventiveness, unparalleled in Indian cinema, is a waste.

The screenplay and performances, the two pillars of a good film, are poor and confused. The scenes have none of the gravitas and magic that define the best of director Mani Ratnam's work. Here, he is too caught up in the spectacle. The idea, that of the myriad, contradictory qualities of the archetypal villain of Hindu mythology, Raavan, never really takes off in the film. Ratnam was concerned with who Raavan is and why he is what he is. In execution, the villain is a caricature.

In stylistic terms, there are some inventions. Visuals speak Raagini's thoughts in one of the scenes. Intercut between a scene where she is lying inert on a damp, mossy gorge, is a scene of her crying out to her husband to be rescued, standing by the river. There are a number of scenes like this, where desires, thoughts and imagination get translated into visuals. But how much can visuals speak the creator's thoughts? Ratnam's heroes are Santosh Sivan and V. Manikandan, the cinematographers of Raavan. Only because of them is this film worth your money and time.

Set in a forest inhabited by a tribal community, somewhere in the South, the demon is Beera. He has a fiefdom in the village and is as loved as he is hated by his people. Beera bhaiyya is a terror. His foe is the local superintendent of police (SP) Dev (Vikram), who is posted in the district. Raagini, his wife, is a dance teacher besotted by him. Beera and his band of men are armed goons who are fighting the establishment because they have had to bear its atrocities in the past. Beera kidnaps Raagini, and Dev's efforts to rescue Raagini and kill Beera propel the rest of the story. While in the forest, Raagini is defiant and refuses to give in to Beera's growing interest in her. Ratnam turns the Ram-Raavan-Sita triangle around, giving it a radical twist.

The sub-text is, of course, Maoist rebellion. The tribal men are plunderers, who, Ratnam suggests, turned violent after years of injustice. The government's armed forces can't get to them, although they are shown making constant inroads into the thick jungles. He has treated the forest with reverence. There are certain rules here, and some logic-defying situations. Human beings can read thoughts and understand what another human being needs. Often Raavan is ghostly, vanishing from a place in a fraction of a second.

But Ratnam is not making overt judgements. In theory, he must have been interested in exploring what drives people to cruelty and violence. He has engaged with this theme in some of his earlier films, most recently in Kannathil Muthamittal. In this film, however, Ratnam's unique capability of turning big ideas about politics and society into commercially viable films about human relationships, suited to very Indian emotions, is woefully missing. That makes Raavan the most disappointing film of 2010.

There are some improbable and absurd situations, which shocked me, coming from a team of such seasoned and knowledgable artists. Absurdity in itself, when used to interpret metaphors, dreams, or even real life, can be a very effective screenwriting or literary technique. But when it obfuscates situations which are inherently based on facts, it is inexcusable. It is amply clear in Raavan that it is set in a forest in the South. Sleeping Vishnu, idols of which appear in more than two scenes, is worshipped mostly in temples of the South. The flavour of the setting—the costumes, the behaviour—in most of the scenes are distinctly Southern. But in the middle of the story, there is a wedding sequence in which the villagers are dressed in north Indian costumes (a sherwani and turban, for example). Why can't a story set in South India be true to its setting and yet be watchable and saleable all over India? The north-South or Bollywood-regional divide, which Ratnam seemed to have bridged—and Ratnam is the only Indian film-maker to achieve that—becomes a mockery in Raavan.

Performances in the film are mediocre; some even silly. Abhishek Bachchan depends entirely on histrionics—growls and scowls, largely. We come to know he is many men in one through villagers describing him to the cops: a devil, a poet, a charmer. Bachchan does not convey any of those shades at all. He has some memorable dialogues which reveal him in bits and parts: for example, "Jo marne se darta nahin, use marenge kaise?" (How do I kill someone who does not fear death?) or a monologue on jealousy where he implies he is the luckiest man in the world because he is jealous in love. But most of the times, he gesticulates or growls. The role itself seems to be in splinters. There are no strands, merging in one solid centre for his character to be believable.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan is more in control, largely because there are no moral complexities or shades to her role. Sita is the victim, here a feisty tone with a mind of her own, but she is always right. As the cop, Vikram seems rather indifferent to his role. In the Tamil and Telegu versions, he has played the role of Raavan, which has been appreciated by some critics in Chennai. But in this role, he is unimpressive. In cameos, Govinda (as the equivalent of Hanuman) and Ravi Kishen as Beera's brotherly comrade are convincing.

A.R. Rahman's music is a foil for the breathtaking visuals; he is ingenious yet another time. All the technical trappings are worth giving in to, if you are a fan of such things. You won't take away much to think about from this film. The visuals will perhaps repeat in your dreams.

It has been years since Ratnam made a masterpiece. His last few films don't match his classics such as Iruvar, Mouna Raagam and Agninakshetram. His Hindi films are always shades worse than his Tamil ones. Ratnam himself told Lounge in an interview that he is much more in control in Tamil. You'll have to watch the Tamil version to find out.

Raavan released in theatres on Friday.

sanjukta.s@livemint.com

poppy2009 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#50

http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_film-review-raavan-ravishing-but-not-high-art_1398117

Mani Ratnam's much beleaguered 'Raavan' has finally hit the screens and it's a true feast for the eyes but the troubles that haunted it right throughout it's shooting schedule has left it's indelible mark on cohesion and coherence of the film. First cinematographer V Manikandan begged-off due to unspecified reasons and ace Santosh Sivan was brought on board, then came Mani's health scare mid-way through the shoot followed by several other niggling incidents plaguing the film. And it all shows right through the film.

The first half of the film that dwells extensively on the Sitaharan episode of the Ramayana, is especially unrewarding. Here Sita is Ragini(Aishwariya), dance teacher and wife ofMani's Ram, super cop Dev( Vikram) who is hell-bent on capturing escaped convict Beera(Abhishek Bachchan), basically a cross between Robin Hood and Veerappanand representativeofMani's Raavan. The camera is aimed high up in the air when Beerafirst appears on screen standing atop a cliff ready to jump into a gorge. Then it moves down with dizzying speed following his dive into
the water. Cut to his escape from captivity fleeing into dense forestsand then moving to the scene where he kidnaps Ragini by crashing his boat into her canoe-again cut to scenes of her in captivity. Dev is in on the chase, seeks the help of a hanuman like character, a suspended forest officer(played by Govinda)and so the great exposition plays on.- right up to the interval. There's so much focus on technique and almost zero development that the narrative in the first half itself goes for a toss. Up to that point the camera is constantly on a whorl, there's little story to tell, the language and intonations are unfamiliar and alien, dialogues are stilted and indistinct and the performances are style centered. Art design by Samir Chanda is exquisite and the camera captures every luscious detail of every set and location with great verve. But as a viewer you can't help feeling cheated by it all. Other than a subconscious awareness of the artistic visuals there's very little purchase to be had. Post interval the chase gets a little-bit more interesting.

The second half of the film has a little more to say. Ragini's
inadvertent attraction to Beera, Dev's obsession with Beera that
supersedes his love for his wife, the loss of face of a
Suparnarekha-like character(essayed by Priyamani), Dev's fight with Beera on a bridge high up in the air connecting two precarious mountain peaks, Ragini's eventual rescue and the final surprise twist which represents Sita's agnipariksha are handled with far greater finesse leading to slightly better coherence and is therefore more rewarding than the first half. The battle between good and evil, between Dev and Beera, between Ram and Raavan in not all that interesting. But when the lines dividing good and evil start blurring there appears a semblance of depth. But the restlessness and irritation experienced before continues to linger.

The two halves of the film appear to be two different films
altogether. Mani'snarrative lacks fluidity. The film appears to be
plotted like a storyboard representation of the Ramayana. The
highpoints of the story appear to be stringed together by high-end
editing, jump cuts et al. And it's not in the least bit entertaining.
Beera's character ticks are extremely irritating especially because
Abhishek plays him like a facial contortionist devoid of all feeling.

His body language is so stiff that his ability to blend into the dense
forests is always in question and this inspite of the ten different
faces he wears. Aishwariya is photographed with a lot of love and care but her performance doesn't really achieve any high point. Ragini is the weakest character in the film and Ms Rai doesn't appear to have the kind of talent required to rise to the challenge. Vikram's Dev is merely a caricature and Govinda's performance is typically populist in nature. Priyamani stands out with a heartfelt performance as Beera's stepsister struck down by tragedy while Ravi Kishen is surprisingly restrained as Beera's filial accomplice. Mani's 'Dev D' like approach of couching the narrative with vocal refrains prevents the dialogues from being heard and understood. The dance choreography is as always top-notch- Aishwariya is given ample screen-time to espouse her nimble-footedness in a romantic number that intercuts the chase sequence. And it's definitely the most delectable piece of dance seen on film. The wedding party sequence is also full-of color and gaiety.

The music though is reminiscent of Rahman's earlier southern
compositions, none of the songs stand-out, they are merely passable and Gulzar's lyrics fail to fit in convincingly enough. Mani's film is an action-drama cum musical but despite the bullets and vertiginous action the drama is extremely plebian. You just don't care for any of the characters and that is mainly why it fails to impress!

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

1 months ago

Tehran Reviews- starring John Abraham (out on Netflix)

Tehran Reviews- John Abraham and Manushi Chillar...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

1 months ago

The Bengal Files - Reviews And Box Office

https://x.com/vivekagnihotri/status/1946940660067803443...

https://x.com/vivekagnihotri/status/1946940660067803443
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

22 days ago

Vash Level 2 - Reviews And Box Office

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/vash-level-2-review-a-rare-sequel-that-unsettles-in-the-best-way-and-lingers-long-after_226452...

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/vash-level-2-review-a-rare-sequel-that-unsettles-in-the-best-way-and-lingers-long-after_226452
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

1 months ago

Coolie - Reviews And Box Office

https://x.com/UmairSandu/status/1954571916745794046

https://x.com/UmairSandu/status/1954571916745794046
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Maroonporsche

1 months ago

War 2 -Movie Reviews & BO Discussion

https://x.com/umairsandu/status/1954950592771895651?s=46 Tis is review thread ?

https://x.com/umairsandu/status/1954950592771895651?s=46
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".