The Actors. - Page 23

Created

Last reply

Replies

287

Views

15.9k

Users

42

Likes

434

Frequent Posters

415781 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
Ajay Devgan is a one trick pony to me. He can only do those brooding silent type roles. He has no versatility.
pksanam thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
considering SRK does not get as much appreciated for his acting skills, i'd say he is actually an under-rated actor... one can say he is over-hyped, that would be more of a correct assessment...
and the 'king' tag and all that came a lot after in his career, not initially... so it's a wrong claim that he made his journey up due to the media tag.. he reached where he did purely due to his hard work in his movies....
and i do not think that SRK is any less capable than AK because he has proven, when given a chance he can easily match AK's acting skills, if not more... rest is everyone's own point of view, whom they prefer...
SRK was never considered good looking... he himself has acknowledged this on many occasions, in his own style, of course....
i think an actor's job is to touch the audience... this is why i would rate Hrithik just as high because when they play a role, i can relate to their 'characters' in the movie, not them as stars... however, it is also true that with certain directors, their performances can be a bit over-the-top...
and just to clariy to some, SRK plays these over-the-top characters, however, he is not like that as a person... even if he is known for it...!
ShadowKisses thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago

Originally posted by: starstrucK.



Surely, not every single one of his performances can be applauded, but majority of his performances have been significant, at least in my opinion. Maybe it's me being biased as an ardent Shah Rukh fan, but I hold the opinion of SRK being a marvelous actor. Why? Simply because I can relate to his acting. I said this before in another thread somewhere, and I will mention it here too. I need to feel the emotions of an actor/actress while performing onscreen. If I can't for whatever reason, then the artist has thrown me off somewhere with his/her acting, and I'm sure many people can agree with me on that. And I firmly believe that is one reason why some people can confidently say that yes, SRK is very talented as an actor. With a few exceptions, SRK's performances always leave an impact on me as the audience. I don't think SRK has to "try" to make the audience laugh/smile/cry with his roles, he just does it flawlessly without much effort - and the audience falls for it (at least the majority of the audience does). If I can't relate to what an artist is trying to illustrate, then there is surely something wrong.

SRK was never as good looking as Aamir or Salman. His looks were never to die for, nor did he start off with an extraordinary persona. He had to make his way up with nothing else, but his acting skills, and I can confidently say that SRK is what he is through his hard work in films. Not his hard work hosting shows, or hard work as having better PR skills than any Aamir or Salman or whoever. If anything, you'll see his fans stating he's a great actor, not someone who has great PR skills whatsoever, all of that comes afterwards.

As far as Aamir is concerned, I'm not a fan of Aamir Khan although he is a good actor, but not someone who I find better than SRK. At the end of the day, I can't seem to understand how Aamir "IS" a better actor than SRK. No he isn't, that's merely an opinion. Likewise, for all SRK fans saying SRK is a better actor than Aamir. Nevertheless, I feel SRK has done a variety of roles, I have always been captivated by majority of them and I feel that is enough for me to categorize him as a fine actor, and then a great superstar.

Enough said from my side. : )

Personally, acting isn't about relating -- if it was, I'm not sure I would have enjoyed Saif's performance in Omkara or Kamal's performance in Nayagan/Nayakan as much as I did. It is fascinating and intriguing to see actors play a whole different person. Some do it convincingly, other's don't. While every performance of SRK doesn't need to be out of this world, most of his movies are repetitive. He rarely steps out of his comfort zone - which consists of him portraying himself. That said, if you find his acting skills excellent, that's your opinion and I'll leave it at that simply because both of us look at different aspects of what is better when it concerns acting.
I disagree that he has achieved and gained a fanbase solely based on his acting. He isn't a Naseeruddin Shah who has reached where he is based only on his acting ability. SRK's cute boy-next-door looks, his Delhi common-man persona and his public relations have played a major role in making him as big a star as he is today, whether you chose to ignore that or not. A lot of his fans also claim that he is charming and more amiable than the other actors. That is a huge reason why he clicks with the audience and has such phenomenal star value.
I never claimed otherwise; it was a perspective that Aamir is better. However, the fact remains that in Bollywood, acting alone doesn't get one very far which is probably why Aamir's star value has never been as huge as SRK's. Not just Aamir, the likes of Naseeruddin Shah, Kamal Hassan, and Irfan Khan have never made it that big (not in Bollywood, anyways). Surely, it's not because they aren't great actors - because they are - but because they don't "connect" to the majority of the audience like SRK does.
pksanam thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
Shadowkisses... i agree partly with your post... however, it is not true that aamir was as fine an actor as he is now... if we look at some of his earlier work, he also got typecasted in many similar roles (his earlier work like love love love, tum mere ho, afsana pyar ka, etc.)... in between, he did give some super performances as well (Dil, Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar)... he did try to venture into action in between (his Baazi comes to mind) where he over-acted by more than a mile and of course, needless to say that did not work...
it's not to say that he lacked the talent, but there are other factors that are involved, i.e. direction, script and effective screenplay... i don't think the reason for him 'not achieving as much star value' has anything to do with his PR skills but more to do with his choice of movies at that time... just looking at his filmography would show one that...
but anyways, to each his/her own... i respect your opinion, even if i may not agree with it... 😊
Irfan Khan though is a fantastic actor... imo, much better than both the ruling Khans... it's a shame he has not gotten his due in bollywood.... but i am glad at least he has made his mark internationally... i do hope we see him more in bollywood though... and Naseeruddin Shah is a personal favourite... so is Anupam Kher... 😃
Edited by pksanam - 16 years ago
pichchi thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago

Originally posted by: pksanam

Irfan Khan though is a fantastic actor... imo, much better than both the ruling Khans... it's a shame he has not gotten his due in bollywood.... but i am glad at least he has made his mark internationally... i do hope we see him more in bollywood though... and Naseeruddin Shah is a personal favourite... so is Anupam Kher... 😃



Agree with this
pksanam thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
thank you... 😃
Edited by pksanam - 16 years ago
-shehzaadi- thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
liking this discussion on SRK.
personally I think he's an awesome actor, but for some reason always end up doing the romantic hero roles. yes, he has done other stuff but that is a relatively smaller percentage of his work. I think that, especially at this age, he should start experimenting more. I thought he was going to do that after CDI came out but then again he went back to doing OSO and then RNBDJ.
pksanam thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
^^ yeah, RNBDJ was more of a favour to YRF... wish he would not do that anymore... i love the movie but still... he should experiment more....
amir used to be typecasted in similar roles earlier too but look at him now...
SRK should take more risk... because he does well with a capable director and a great script... even if the movie works or not, as was the case with Swades...
Edited by pksanam - 16 years ago
Devi_101 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
Thats true about aamir... after the success of QSQT he did struggle early on in his career, i mean what was he thinking when he did films like Deewana Mujhsa Nahin? But he's definitley found his niche now and is one of my fav actors. I admire the way he put in the preparation for his characters. But i also appreciate SRK as an actor. He's shown there is another side to him other than his Raj/Rahul characters when he did Swades and Chak De India. I also admire the fact he's prepared to take risks like when he did Darr, no main hero wanted to do the negative role but SRK took the opportunityand excelled in that role.
pksanam thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago

Originally posted by: little_rake

Thats true about aamir... after the success of QSQT he did struggle early on in his career, i mean what was he thinking when he did films like Deewana Mujhsa Nahin? But he's definitley found his niche now and is one of my fav actors. I admire the way he put in the preparation for his characters. But i also appreciate SRK as an actor. He's shown there is another side to him other than his Raj/Rahul characters when he did Swades and Chak De India. I also admire the fact he's prepared to take risks like when he did Darr, no main hero wanted to do the negative role but SRK took the opportunityand excelled in that role.

well, there is an interview of SRK where he said that he pretty much took up all the rejected roles in the beginning of his career...
actually, deewana mujh sa nahin was relatively better than some of the other ones he did... but yeah, as i said... it was more to do with his choice of movies as well...
also, fact he did very few movies also worked against him... SRK also did some 'strange' (i'm being kind here, lol) movies, but he did so many movies, most of which worked, that overall, they did not work against him...
it's not that SRK is not capable of delivering... he has proven he is... i just wish SRK too would experiment a bit more as well...!
Edited by pksanam - 16 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: cougarTown · 1 months ago

What is this sudden obsession with 2016 and why is everyone posting 2016 pictures??

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 2 months ago

https://x.com/i/status/2005150488988397656

https://x.com/i/status/2005150488988397656
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Elvis12 · 2 months ago

https://x.com/its_cinehub/status/2006288950697263211?s=46

https://x.com/its_cinehub/status/2006288950697263211
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 2 months ago

Bollywood Hungama actors roundtable Ishaan Vicky Ayushmann Aditya Raghav and Vishal...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 2 months ago

Bollywood actors at World Tennis league Sara Ali Khan https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSdEfrOjGCz/?igsh=dmI3bXp0anh4YnQ3 Kartik Ananya...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSdEfrOjGCz/
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".