Amar is More Hijra than Laxmi

arkamu thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
He couldnt say anyting to SId even though he opnely humliiated him

lol he only knows how to fight with women like Juhi and Pm

when it comes to fighting with maales lol he loses all his balls :d

Created

Last reply

Replies

10

Views

1.5k

Users

4

Likes

6

Frequent Posters

Whatisthisss thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
exactly what i said in my earlier post.. he can only argue with females.. when it comes to males its 'live and let live' mantra.. hes pathetic
Preciousa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
Why would he fight with Siddhart while the fight is between Mishra and Amar!? And Mishra just wouldn't shut her mouth about Amar so obviously he felt irritated, well done I would say!
LoveMahek thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
completely wrong, pooja mishra started the whole issue with amar and pooja mishra called amar a hijra which is a very big insult, if i was in place of amar i would have done much worst to her
Whatisthisss thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
where was amars tongue when sid on live eviction said he'll make a railroad out of him or smthing/openly insulting him.. and when he alleged on live tv amar was hauling mb abuses at him?? tht time it was "live and let live ".. why didnt amar give it back to sid there n then??
Edited by an0n - 13 years ago
arkamu thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: LoveMahek

completely wrong, pooja mishra started the whole issue with amar and pooja mishra called amar a hijra which is a very big insult, if i was in place of amar i would have done much worst to her



lol sidhant humiliaited him lol and even in front of every one kai mein is ki rail banata
lol like a CHAKKA he was there
y lol he only becomes irritated when females say him anything
he is a ZANKHA thats a fact
arkamu thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: LoveMahek

completely wrong, pooja mishra started the whole issue with amar and pooja mishra called amar a hijra which is a very big insult, if i was in place of amar i would have done much worst to her



no pooja mishra was 200 percent right amar should have stopped issue
because when amar fought with juhi she tried to make juice
she was true in calling amar a hijra because amar is scared of Sid
its now proved he is hijra
no offence y his wife left him
i m now doubtin whether his kids are real ones or has he invited some friend to spend some time with his wife and give him children! i m not sure though😉
arkamu thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: an0n

where was amars tongue when sid on live eviction said he'll make a railroad out of him or smthing/openly insulting him.. and when he alleged on live tv amar was hauling mb abuses at him?? tht time it was "live and let live ".. why didnt amar give it back to sid there n then??



cent percent right
Preciousa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9
Let's not make up words. Siddhart said on the live show that Amar keeps calling him 'bacha' and IF he was truly a bacha THEN he would have made Amar a 'rail-track', he said NOTHING more than that. Siddhart more-over didn't hold on Amar's throat, he had the dignity to call it quits as soon as Siddhart called it quits too. Siddhart didn't go tell Amar that he is a 'hijra' or that he is surprised that 'Amar is a man' or called him 'double-faced'. The confrontation between Amar-Siddhart was nothing like that between Amar-Mishra, and it doesn't surprise people looking for the similarity only so they can justify Mishra. Again. Who thinks the entire world owes her an apology.
arkamu thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Preciousa

Let's not make up words. Siddhart said on the live show that Amar keeps calling him 'bacha' and IF he was truly a bacha THEN he would have made Amar a 'rail-track', he said NOTHING more than that. Siddhart more-over didn't hold on Amar's throat, he had the dignity to call it quits as soon as Siddhart called it quits too. Siddhart didn't go tell Amar that he is a 'hijra' or that he is surprised that 'Amar is a man' or called him 'double-faced'. The confrontation between Amar-Siddhart was nothing like that between Amar-Mishra, and it doesn't surprise people looking for the similarity only so they can justify Mishra. Again. Who thinks the entire world owes her an apology.



sidhat said openly to shakti that when i came in show
people said amar ji bade auratana ho gaye hian

lol amar at that time pretended he has not listeend it!!!

and regarding todays fight pooja was jsut highligting fact that how diplomatic and feminie amr is

which is true? Isnt it?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".