Originally posted by: sammy17
Although i agree love isn't needed to make a marriage work and it is better off than a relationship like maya and arjun's, i really dislike when people advocate arranged marriages as more longstanding and permanent than love marriages on the basis of statistics, when those statistics merely record the low level of divorce rates among arranged marriages, and not the structural causes for these low levels.
The truth about arranged marriages and why divorce rates are low is because the arranged marriage practise stems from traditional views of marriage in the first place where it is believed parents know better who is good for their children, so the parent chooses the partner for their child believing their decision is better than any decision their child could make, and that marriages shouldn't be broken, so divorce is frowned upon.
In arranged marriages, the couple barely know each other before they marry, unlike in love marriages, and they have to get to know one another after marriage. In an arranged marriage once you get to know your partner, if you realise the person isn't right for you for some reason, you are stuck with them, as you have to compromise, as both families would be against them divorcing and divorce would be discouraged by both families, so the couple would be pressured by family into staying together, because in arranged marriages, the marriage is more about two families rather than the couple.