Shame Shame - Page 11

giving gold chain to mannu how it is equivalent in claming right , I think in claming rights person only snatch they do not give anything .and moreover when ratan himself know that he will not live more than few days so how can he claim rights , can a person who is going to dying so soon can claim rights

ratan destroyed mannu's peace of mind indirectly & bimla directly. i think "tellygeek"'d cleared it in her post.

Originally posted by: jayshree1942

Tiny15

no dear, in reality indian kids r not that broad minded. number r very less.

and u said about anandi but i think shivam dont know that jagya was anandi's first husband.

That truth is yet to reveal. I dont know whether cvs will cover this part .

anyway but ya its very strange that mannu remember only last moment he spent with ratan , that last emotional moment has more weight age then what ganga suffered in so many years.

well according to me story is moving to next generation so next generation should know child marriage and its evil consequences , it should be little educative. so that next generation will get ready to fight for it. But right now its masala track.

Let see how cvs will change mannu's opinion.

i m not saying in normal cases. i m saying in ganga,Aji & asha type of cases.

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Shivam accepting what he had been told by his Dsa and mother about his sister is comparatively much smaller than Mannu learning that the man who he considered as father is not his father but the stranger who died in front of him was his father.

While his being angry upset at his mother was understandable his lashing out at J was taking things a bit too far.

Even Shivam could have dug deep and started blaming his mother for losing Nandini.
Both situations are not drastically different. In Mannu's case a perosn he never knew has died.
In Shivam's case a person he never knew is found to be his twin and lost in this big bad world !
Both cases, emotional bonds with existing people are strong and they are well protected.

it is not my opinion that if once person who has done bad thing even he do good thing he still should be crictize .I have criticize
jagya for cheating anandi in the same way I have appreciate jagya for helping ganga selflessly

I have criticize ds for being so harsh with her family .I have appreciate ds for becoming progressive

jagya has recieve apology from his family but ratan did not recieve apology even after his death he is still crictize even after his death .now what can ratan harm do to ganga even after his death , then ganga is still crictizing ratan .so naturally bimla will think no use of becoming good

telling half truth even about bad person is not good thing .and let ganga not forgive ratan even after his death , , butwhy o tell only that truth only which is suited to ganga

ratan is not criticised 4 bcuming gud but ppl don't expect ratan like hard criminals wud'd changed al2gether.

ganga ko mannu ka life save karte samay ratan singh ka bone marrow lene mein kyon problem nahi hui .why can she told at that time v can arrange bone marrow from other donor but not from ratan .I dont want ehsaan from ratan .but what to do ganga thinking if time needed then gadhey ko bhi pitaa h banana padta hai

1st of all ganga wanted BM from ratan bocz they want t2 save time which was v.less.

Forget revealing the bad past, Anandi does not seem to have spoken about even Shiv and his family to Shivam. Not one word about the wonderful father he was, and his supreme sacrifice for the nation. Not one word about, if not the entire family, at least daddu, who in my opinion, was one of TV world's most progressive elder.

Ok, it was difficult to talk in BH but when she moved to Shiv Niketan, was it not necessary to commemorate the bravery of Shiv? No wonder Shivam doesn't ever say he wants to be in IAS like his father or in the army like daddu.