Reality check for Ganga - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

123

Views

9.8k

Users

22

Likes

440

Frequent Posters

vasiraju thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

even if saachi truns like Gauri ..shekers won't allow to her in laws stay with them ...where will she go..
vasiraju

Shekhars will allow anything. They are not traditional people to send sanchi back to sasural at any cost.. What do you mean that sanchi has nowhere to go? Sanchi is educated and she can live independently as a working woman.


Its again repeats Gauri character...what do you think shiv and anadi let saachi to go somewhere in leave a single life ..and will be happy seeing jayiya getting married ganga leaving saachi ..

Shekers have some common sense ..they never let saachi to go against her sasural ..

you are forgetting she is sister of shiv a sensible person ..he wnats her sister life to be happy not to sit in their house and crying .

its became really complicated even to shiv to accept the ganga and jagiya marrige ..if jagiya rejects saachi when all marriage arrangements starts ..he is also a brother of a girl . total family gets hurts if jagiya changes his decision too late


vasiraju thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

It is really ridiculous to think that an educated woman has to live only at maika or at sasural. This type of thinking is what is making woman's equality a difficult thing. Gauri is able to live independently because she has good education. I appreciate gauri for that.Even uneducated women live independently working as labourers, maids etc.


OMG my context saachi can't go anywhere means ..she was pampered and protected by the family like a little kid ...

I won't have that feeling of woman on the whole ..when we are discussing about saachi ..i said in that context ..she didn't see the outer world ..she thinks according her small family ..that is shekers doing everything for her..and she expecting same thing from jagdish ..which is not

she can't live without her family ..she loves them the most next to herself..she can't singly live as jagiya can't ..these are of same type ..they will live for their families but they want everything they wish .

In overall context i agree with you ...women should think independently...and these days most of the woman doing that .
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

It happens. Prince Charles fell for a commoner. Somebody in their dynasty gave up thrown to marry a commoner.
In Rebecca, the wealthy elderly man marries a companion and sticks with her for life.

Prince Salim fell for Anarkali.

Priyanka married an ordinary Vadra. Her father also married an ordinary girl.

Dont bring Royals topic here please. Prince charles or Prince William did not marry commoners though it may look that way. Their spouses were in no way ordinary people. They were equally wealthy and had their own class, though not belonging to royal families.

leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#44
Ganga cant live without her mannu. So she may take him and arrange part time help to take care of mannu. Or She can leave him with mannu's father also because he loves mannu and can care for him in his own way. There is this psychology I am using. Ganga fears harm from ratan only. So if she voluntarily gives Ratan what he wants temporarily, she can go ahead and pursue a career.

Out of the box thinking.
lovesunshine thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

It happens. Prince Charles fell for a commoner. Somebody in their dynasty gave up thrown to marry a commoner.

In Rebecca, the wealthy elderly man marries a companion and sticks with her for life.

Prince Salim fell for Anarkali.

Priyanka married an ordinary Vadra. Her father also married an ordinary girl.

If you are talking about Prince Charles and Lady Diana..yes Diana was a commoner BUT not an ordinary dukhiyaari gareeb ghar ki...her parents were wealthy and quite connected politicially...Diana's father John Spencer was the 8th Earl of Spencer..besides do you know Prince charles was 'dating' Diana's elder sister before her and then he 'fell' for her 😉

Abt your "somebody in the UK Royal Family who gave up throne for a commoner " was George the V's eldest son who married American socialite Wallis Simpson. He gave up the throne only because Wallis Simpson was a divorcee and in those days a Queen consort to be a 'virgin' was an essential requirement. But again this lady Simpson was not a gareeb and dukhiyaari.. She was a rich american socialite

Robert Vadra is also not gareeb and dukhiyaara..he was also quite wealthy before marrying priyanka..

If you are talking about Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi - Sonia was NOT a gareeb dukhiyaari either her father was a very rich and influential Italian man.

Prince Salim and Anarkali - oh well yes her fell for her But did not marry her!

We all ladies lap up the Cinderella story but its never really true...

so girls wake up and only choose the good , right man...dont keep dreaming abt a prince charming!
vasiraju thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: lovesunshine

If you are talking about Prince Charles and Lady Diana..yes Diana was a commoner BUT not an ordinary dukhiyaari gareeb ghar ki...her parents were wealthy and quite connected politicially...Diana's father John Spencer was the 8th Earl of Spencer..besides do you know Prince charles was 'dating' Diana's elder sister before her and then he 'fell' for her 😉

Abt your "somebody in the UK Royal Family who gave up throne for a commoner " was George the V's eldest son who married American socialite Wallis Simpson. He gave up the throne only because Wallis Simpson was a divorcee and in those days a Queen consort to be a 'virgin' was an essential requirement. But again this lady Simpson was not a gareeb and dukhiyaari.. She was a rich american socialite

Robert Vadra is also not gareeb and dukhiyaara..he was also quite wealthy before marrying priyanka..

If you are talking about Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi - Sonia was NOT a gareeb dukhiyaari either her father was a very rich and influential Italian man.

Prince Salim and Anarkali - oh well yes her fell for her But did not marry her!

We all ladies lap up the Cinderella story but its never really true...

so girls wake up and only choose the good , right man...dont keep dreaming abt a prince charming!


@bold yep so true yesterday i was thinking the same ..if Ganga marries jagiya ..then it will be another Cinderella story...which are good for fantacy...and to dream such stories but reality is different 😊
vasiraju thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Ganga cant live without her mannu. So she may take him and arrange part time help to take care of mannu. Or She can leave him with mannu's father also because he loves mannu and can care for him in his own way. There is this psychology I am using. Ganga fears harm from ratan only. So if she voluntarily gives Ratan what he wants temporarily, she can go ahead and pursue a career.

Out of the box thinking.


😆 😆 you are using so much of brain ...Ganga can leave Mannu in saachi's Coustedy ...they both are kids they will play and Mannu teach some lessons to saachi 😆...how is it 😉
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#48

That was shocking to me...😲 ..a mother crying before her son for another man, telling him that she is finding it difficult to forget him? 🤪

wow ! what values is she inculcating in her son ! Maa ho toh aisi !👎🏼

Edited by Shinya - 12 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#49
I agree with all of you.

Poor people should not have feelings.
They should not fall in love with rich guys.
They are disgusting like trash bins. They have to take all the trash and live in an obscure corner.
Even in fiction they should not dare to dream. They should not even cry. Better they die.

While rich girls can almost rape the man they desire.
It is such a wonderful site to see rich girls insulting poor girls.
Rich girls can be extremely brattish but they look good with all that attitude.

I am ashamed to be a brainless member of this forum rooting for something which is so unreasonable.


Edited by leavesandwaves - 12 years ago
BeyondTheSky thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: Shinya

That was shocking to me...😲 ..a mother crying before her son for another man, telling him that she is finding it difficult to forget him? 🤪

wow ! what values is she inculcating in her son ! Maa ho toh aisi !👎🏼



can ganga not even cry her heart out when alone with her toddler son..
you want to even take that right away from her because she is poor 😡.


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".