Right to Abortion - Page 6

Originally posted by: ankit111

their fualt doubled becoz they both r so called Dr. And not so called gawanr, who don't know how to take precautions 😆 😆

exactly they r dhabba on name of doctors khud ko sambhal nahin sakte doosron ko kyaa theek akrenge😆😆 i was rofling when g was saying yeh sab kaise 😆😆she was behaving like an ablaa naari😆

The word "consequences" make a baby sound like Punishment. And that is insulting for a baby.

My point is---a baby should be welcomed, not had out of majboori.

@ intruderfast: A baby needs their mother at all times, so giving him/her to parents to be cared for is not a good idea.

Also, its does not make sense to "wait" until a certain period. They're married, why should they wait?

Also, you cannot always refrain when you're living together. That's impractical.

^^ I second you there.

Originally posted by: sayali_babes

@ intruderfast: A baby needs their mother at all times, so giving him/her to parents to be cared for is not a good idea.

Also, its does not make sense to "wait" until a certain period. They're married, why should they wait?

Also, you cannot always refrain when you're living together. That's impractical.

i am not saying wait , but they should have been careful , they r doctors for god's sake
and if they dont know how to be careful its better not do it and take unnecesaary risks
i dont think ki gaga used protection or gauri had contaceptives later(agar aisa hota toh bataate zaroor)
so i cannot support gauri's decision at all
however its a very sensitive topic and i just have told my thinking , i dont intend to impose it on anyone so chill😊

For people who are saying that Gauri should carry the baby and then give it up for adoption or that jagya should be raising the child most of the time ...

... This is one of the most sexist statements i have heard ... What you are saying is that the woman's body is some sort of item available for rent ... She doesn't want a child but the father does so she should loan out her body for 9 months, her milk for 4-5 months and then her job is done

women who give up their children for adoption immediately after birth are those who CANNOT care for a child not those who don't WANT a child.

Why are all the feminists so pro choice (or pro abortion) ?
... Because the right to your own body is the most fundamental rights of all - more the right to education/ food/ clean water etc etc ... If you do not have a say in what your own body should do, then what freedom are you talking about ?

Can you imagine if laws are passed banning abortions because the husband doesn't want one ? ... Its a down slide from thereon ... Next will be marital rape - a woman shouldn't have the right to say 'no sex' to her husband ... next what treatments can a woman say her body should be subjected to - say a woman is barren ... her husband says i want a child ... his wants but her body ... so he forces her to have IVF even if she doesn't want it (its damn painful) ... a husband has a defective organ say a kidney, wants his wife to give one ... its the least she can do to save her husband's life ... she doesn't get a choice etc etc etc

See where this will go ... The right to your own body ... that is what this is about ... A woman is not just a machine for child birth and neither is a child a punishment for a thoughtless night that one has to "suffer the consequences" as some people put it

@ intruder: well, this is not about imposing beliefs on anybody, this is a Debate, as I take it? 😊 In debate what we do is criss-crossing and countering the others' view.

Well, don't you think that its a bit bold for an Indian show to openly mention the use of contraceptives? First point is that.

Secondly, what mine and all the other pro-choicers' main view is, is that a woman should have absolute control on her body and what her lifestyle permits. That is healthy both for the woman as well as for the child. An unwanted child can foster "bad-parents" problems, don't you think?