Originally posted by: vasuja
i agree with tinoo and annika...but that is anandi right...she has not yet moved on...she is just trying to...that is the reason i feel that Jagya will get the divorce too easily without any punishment...Anandi will just shake her head for mutual consent and every thing will be over...I hope Bhairon or basanth just go and present the case of bigamy and do something...there is no hope from Anandi to punish Jagya...
I wish during her samaj seva, when she urges people to fight for their rights, i hope someone in the crowd point out how she left her husband scott free and she cannot preach other...Anandi gets on my nerves when she does this...Her logic is 😡
That is why I was not excited when Bapusa said that I will give money to Anandi, she can give anyone...because anandi is not gonna wait till jagya asks...she proactively deposits and then inform...a thick skinned person like Jagya cannot get ashamed becoz of that...I wish Bhairon has totally refused giving money...Jaggu dada ki saccha pyaar do din mein pata chal jaata...I was not even happy with loss of stipend becoz I knew Anandi will send money.
I magine the situation of Jagya with no money, bade paapa funding both of them...even the smallest thing gauri says he would have taken it other way and shown his sacha pyaar😡
So true!! She's lying to herself and merely making a show of moving on - if they show her like this!
She knows she can't get her Jagya back. But I think she is yet to detach herself from him! She is still the paanch saal pehle wali Anandi!
Vasu Bhairon and Basant cannot do anything unless Anandi - the wronged party agrees to open her mouth! Lawyers will also be helpless!
Anandi will not do anything at all! She talks of family's izzat! Arrey in reality it's also about Jagya's izzat and reputation!!
Thinking of others is good. But it's foolish when you're only thinking of others and not at all about yourself!
It's true. I hope others point out to her that she chose to keep silent and did not even want to let her husband know of his illegal marriage. She let her husband go scot-free, so with what face and in what capacity is she trying to give margdarshan to others??!!
When she undertakes her social work, she will not just have to educate people but also inform them about laws! She will come across women like her who were cheated, but who want to live with their husband only and not want to move on. With what face will she tell them about laws?!
You don't practice what you preach so what's the point of preaching?! How is this stance different from Gauri's preaching about rights of child brides but actually trampling on the rights and life of another child bride? One woman got exploited and let others exploit her, another exploited someone for her own gain. What's the difference?
Anyay sehne wala anyay karne wale se bada paapi hota hai! Isn't this what Bhagwad Gita says?
Like I said yesterday, Vasu, to me, Anandi's support to J and her inaction against him or not even exactly moving away from him is very much like King Dhritrashtra not doing anything against Duryodhan due to his emotional attachment to his son and feeling of helplessness or guilt in doing anything against him or refusing anything to him!🤢
Bhairon should not have given any rights to Anandi if he wanted to teach a lesson to J. He should not have allowed Anandi to interfere in his decision in dealing with J. J's eyes would have opened and he'd have known atte-daal ka bhaav when his funding would've stopped!!😡
The biggest thing Bhairon needed to do was to stop Jagya communicating with Anandi and seeing to it that he's never able to talk to her or emotionally blackmail her, use her to get his things done!
I always say, this so-called ostracism of Jagya or so-called family cutting off ties with Jagya - it's all a big sham! Dhakonsla hai yeh!
Arrey1 He's not even having to ask Anandi. Bina kahey sab ho raha hai and she's also updating him about family well-being. Kya khaak sazaa hai yeh?!!
A thick-skinned guy like him needs something really solid to teach him a lesson.
I don't even call it Gandhigiri. That's like announcing Civil Disobedience first, but obeying all government rules and orders the very next day! Gandhi ji used to TAKE A SOLID STAND. Gandhigiri doesn't mean letting others walk all over you like a doormat!