Okay I had read this article way before but I searched up again for this quote given here. Please read:
Link;, https://www.boloji.com/articles/16034/mahabharata-draupadi-birth-mystery-decoded
The obvious answer to this is quite evident to our Common Sense, and therefore, does not need explanation. My eight year old daughter watching Draupadi's birth in Mahabharata on Star Plus asked me, “how is this possible?” The problem is: many grown-ups suffering from Self-Delusion that they are Religious, never ask this question. By a peculiar logic – sort of Willing Suspension of Disbelief – they never ask, how, the Mahabharatan age could all of a sudden be an age when everything (read supernatural mumbo-jumbos) is possible!
The preceding age – the Vedic age – and even the Upanishadik age (preceding, contemporary and later) never speak of Birth-Myths or Physical Immortality etc.; in fact, the Rshis pray for 100 years of life, not more. Then, how could the Mahabharatan age explode all of a sudden when Supernatural Birth Myth, Physical Immortality etc are possible?
No Human Being can ever be born without biological process; therefore, Draupadi could not be born from Yajna-Agni (Sacrificial Fire). Yes, birth without Sex is possible nowadays, thanks to cloning technology etc and other technology … but even as yet, no human birth is possible without a Mother’s womb … natural or surrogate. Those who believe that Ancient Bharatvarsha had cloning technology etc or that test-tube baby was born in “Pot” (Drona-Kalasa) as in Drona-Acarya’s birth etc… with all due respect, that is simply child’s babble to me. Our country and nation has enough glory to feed the world for a lifetime; we need not to invent ideas like – Sab Vyaade Achhe (‘Everything is in Vedas’)
Again, birth as grown-up is impossible. Animals have that privilege, not Human Beings.
So, it is plain and simple that a fully grown Draupadi could not have been born from Yajna (Sacrifice) or Agni. That instigates the questions: why the Mythical Narrative then? Was Vyasa lying? Who was Draupadi's father? Who was her mother?
It is not that we do not have rational statements in parallel literature. However, there is a tendency to overlook them.
For example, Bhagavat Purana indeed gives a rational statement about Draupadi's birth:
drupadad Draupadi tasya dhrshtadyumnadayah sutah dhrshtadyumnad dhrshtaketur
bharmyah Panchalka ime (SB 9.22.3)
Translation:
“From Maharaja Drupada, Draupadi was born. Maharaja Drupada also had many sons, headed by Dhristadyumna. From Dhristadyumna came a son named Dhrshtaketu. All these personalities are known as descendants of Bharmyashva or as the dynasty of Panchal.”
Let us read the line again - “From Maharaja Drupada, Draupadi was born.” Plain enough! If Draupadi was born from Drupada’s seed (implied, but clear), she could not have been born from Yajna-Agni.
I will not discuss here parallel literature on Mahabharata-narrative, so let us back to Mahabharata, and to Mahabharatan Draupadi in particular.
I'll follow up more facts.